1 / 17

Design and testing of the Beam Delivery System collimators for the International Linear Collider

Design and testing of the Beam Delivery System collimators for the International Linear Collider. J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.

lecea
Download Presentation

Design and testing of the Beam Delivery System collimators for the International Linear Collider

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Design and testing of the Beam Delivery System collimators for the International Linear Collider J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab

  2. The International Linear Collider (ILC) will accelerate 2E10 electrons on one side, and 2E10 positrons on the other up to a center of mass energy of 1 TeV (500 GeV in the first period of operation) in their collision. The ILC will be complementary to the LHC and will allow to study “in detail” the new particles discovered at the LHC. The ILC collimation system is composed of a spoiler and an absorber. The collimator mission is to clean the beam halo from e- or e+ off orbit which could damage the equipment, but mainly to clean the beam from photons generated during the bending of the beam towards the Interaction Point. These photons, if not removed, would generate a noise background that would not allow the detectors to work properly.

  3. 0.6c0 a Starting point • Long, shallow tapers (~20mrad?), reduce short range transverse wakes • High conductivity surface coatings • Robust material for actual beam spoiling • Long path length for errant beams striking spoilers • Large c0 materials (beryllium…, graphite, ...) • Require spoilers survive at least 2 (1) bunches at 250 (500) GeV • Design external geometry for optimal wakefield performance, reduce longitudinal extent of spoiler if possible • Use material of suitable resistivity for coating • Design internal structure using in initial damage survey seems most appropriate.

  4. Spoilers considered include… 0.6c0 2.1010 e-, Ebeam=250 GeV, sxsy=1119mm2 also, Ebeam=500 GeV 2mm 335mrad 10mm Option 1: Ti/C, Ti/Be As per T480 Ti, Cu, Al Graphite regions Option 3: Ti/C Option 2: Ti/C, Cu/C, Al/C 0.3 Xo of Ti alloy upstream and downstream tapers 0.6 Xo of metal taper (upstream), 1 mm thick layer of Ti alloy [Details, see Eurotev Reports 2006-015, -021, -034]

  5. 2 mm deep from top Full Ti alloy spoiler 810 K 405 K 270 K 135 K ∆Tmax = 870 K per a bunch of 2E10 e- at 500 GeV σx = 79.5 µm, σy= 6.36 µm

  6. beam Ti C Ti / Graphite Spoiler Temperature data in the left only valid the Ti-alloy material. Top increase of temp. in the graphite ~400 K. Dash box: graphite region. 540 K 405 K 400 K 270 K ∆Tmax = 575 K per a bunch of 2E10 e- at 500 GeV σx = 79.5 µm, σy= 6.36 µm 2 mm deep from top Ti alloy and graphite spoiler

  7. Summary of simulations Temperature increase from 1 bunch impact Exceeds fracture temp. Exceeds melting temp.

  8. Wakefields deteriorate the beam quality. • A final collimator design should minimise this effect. • Studies on wakefields generated by different collimator geometries. • Comparison to analytic predictions and simulations in order to improve both methods.

  9. Beam Parameters at SLAC ESA and ILC *possible, using undamped beam

  10. ~40 m 2 doublets ~15 m 2 triplets BPM BPM BPM BPM Vertical mover • Wakefield measurement: • Move collimators around beam (in steps of 0.2 mm, from -1.2 mm to +1.2 mm, being 0 mm the centre of the collimator). • Measure deflection from wakefields vs. beam-collimator separation

  11. ~40 m 2 doublets ~15 m 2 triplets BPM BPM BPM BPM Vertical mover • Wakefield measurement: • Move collimators around beam (in steps of 0.2 mm, from -1.2 mm to +1.2 mm, being 0 mm the centre of the collimator). • Measure deflection from wakefields vs. beam-collimator separation

  12. a = 166 mrad r = 1.4 mm Col. 12 L=1000 mm a = 324 mrad r = 2 mm Col. 1 a = 166 r = 1.4 mm (r = ½ gap) Col. 6 Col. 3 a = 324 mrad r = 1.4 mm

  13. L=1000 mm 1Assumes 500-micron bunch length 2Assumes 500-micron bunch length, includes analytic resistive wake; modelling in progress 3Kick Factor measured for similar collimator described in SLAC-PUB-12086 was (1.3 ± 0.1) V/pC/mm 4Still discussing use of linear and linear+cubic fits to extract kick factors and error bars

  14. 10mm low mass mounting target area Cu Ti reference pin hole guide channels pin hole x y Material damage test beam at ATF • The purpose of the first test run at ATF is to: • Make simple measurements of the size of the damage region after individual beam impacts on the collimator test piece. This will permit a direct validation of FLUKA/ANSYS simulations of properties of the materials under test. • Allow us to commission the proposed test system of vacuum vessel, multi-axis mover, beam position and size monitoring. • Validate the mode of operation required for ATF in these tests. • Ensure that the radiation protection requirements can be satisfied before proceeding with a second phase proposal. • Assuming a successful first phase test, the test would be to measure the shock waves within the sample by studying the surface motion with a laser-based system, such as VISAR (or LDV), for single bunch and multiple bunches at approximate ILC bunch spacing. sample holder

  15. A similar test done in SLAC FFTB gave the results that can be seen in the bottom left plot of this section. Results of a FLUKA simulation using same beam and target specification can be seen in the bottom right plot of this section. There is a systematic divergence of ~100 µm2 but both plots agree in the slope. [Measurements c/o Marc Ross et al., Linac’00]

  16. Summary & Future Plans • Resulting mechanical stresses examined with ANSYS3D • Continue study into beam damage/materials • Experimental beam test to reduce largest uncertainties in material properties • Study geometries which can reduce overall length of spoilers while maintaining performance • Means of damage detection, start engineering design of critical components • Combine information on geometry, material, construction, to find acceptable baseline design for • Wakefield optimisation • Collimation efficiency • Damage mitigation

More Related