300 likes | 331 Views
Explore variables in catastrophes caused by hazardous events interacting with human vulnerability. Analyze social and holistic vulnerability, learn about causes and consequences of disasters, and consider the role of people in disaster management. Develop models to understand catastrophe impacts on society and interventions to mitigate risks.
E N D
Variables and Relationships Understanding Catastrophe Causes, Consequences and Coordination
Catastrophes Take place when hazards interact with vulnerability A hazard is an agent that may cause human harm Examples include natural, technological and man-made hazards
Hazards • Can be impressively severe • Arizona meteor crater • Great Sumatra earthquake • China earthquake • Hurricane Katrina • 1918-1919 Spanish Flu • Bhopal • 9/11 • Future threats
Rethinking Hazards We have very little control over hazards Focusing on hazards downplays the human element Scholars suggest we reconsider the “naturalness” of disasters We need to concentrate more on human activities that exacerbate disasters
The Role of People • Environmental Degradation • Tropical diseases may spread • Desertification may occur • Sea levels may rise • Abrupt ice age may result • Storms may increase in frequency and intensity
The Role of People (cont.) • Population Growth • May encourage people to move to hazard-prone areas • May force people to live in densely populated areas
The Role of People (cont.) • Resource Depletion • Watersheds and forests may be lost • Wetlands are in jeopardy • Water is becoming scarce • Food security is in question • Petroleum based economics may collapse
The Role of People (cont.) • Spread of Diseases • Antibiotics may result in mutations • Transportation may spread pathogens
The Role of People (cont.) • Changes in warfare • Terrorists continue to threaten and attack • They target civilians • Weapons have evolved
Vulnerability Is the dependent variable in catastrophes Refers to proneness and limited capabilities Has two schools of thought: social vulnerability and holistic vulnerability
Social Vulnerability Social relationships (political and economic) are to blame for disasters Law, employment, classes, industry, education, and networks have an impact The vulnerable include the poor, minorities, women, children, the elderly, the disabled, prisoners, etc.
Holistic Vulnerability Accepts premise of social vulnerability school Recognizes other causes: choice of location, engineering, degradation, warning systems, operational mistakes, evacuation decisions, planning, EOC management, apathy, urbanization, diet/exercise, technology, religious beliefs, education, coordination and other factors have an impact
Group Project Divide into groups (of 5 people each) Answer the question “what are other potential causes of vulnerability and catastrophe?” Invite a student from each group to report
Variable Interaction The equation H+V=C is much too simple Some events are not sudden A single hazard may trigger other hazards and interact in dynamic ways Examples
Catastrophes are Complicated Mileti’s work on the physical, social and built environments The East Bay Hills Fire
A Model of Catastrophes External and internal hazards Interaction with vulnerability Production of disasters Disasters result in increased vulnerability Model includes physical and social environments as well as liabilities and capabilities
Your Model? Develop your own model of catastrophes Draw your model Discuss it in 2-3 pages and explain its central features
Catastrophes and Society Are non-routine social problems They are unusual They create new and unforeseen challenges Examples
Impact Medical care becomes problematic Sheltering is difficult Public information is nearly impossible Clean up and debris removal is almost insurmountable Rebuilding is a lengthy process Outside involvement is required
Power Point Presentation Select one catastrophe Identify causes Discuss primary, secondary and tertiary consequences Should last no more than 10 minutes
Intervention Points • Mitigation • Serious and thorough risk assessments • Environmental protection • Construction standards • Regulations • Health status and medical capacity • Terrorism prevention
Intervention Points (cont.) • Preparedness • All pre-disaster functions (community education, training, grant management, exercises) • All post-disaster functions (particularly evacuation, sheltering, communications and resource management)
Intervention Points (cont.) • Response • Vulnerable populations • Damage and impact assessments • Flexible deployment of rescue personnel • Inter-state and international mutual aid compacts • Coordination
Intervention Points (cont.) • Recovery • Well-crafted plans • Debris management • Disaster assistance programs • Rebuilding
Writing Assignment 8-10 page paper Addressing a single intervention point in detail Focusing on catastrophes Including lessons learned Illustrating difference to disasters Must provide concrete recommendations
Coordination Models • Bureaucratic Model • Centralized • Top down • Rigid • Self-serving individuals
Coordination Models (cont.) • Problem Solving Model • Decentralized • Bottom-up • Flexible • Altruistic individuals
Strengths and Implications The Bureaucratic Model The Problem Solving Model The need for inclusion and integration
Class Activity • Guest speakers • Fire fighter • Emergency manager • Questions about coordination models
Conclusion Catastrophes result from hazards and vulnerability Many variables are involved and in complicated ways Impacts of catastrophes are significant Special measures are required Two models can help us manage catastrophes