230 likes | 242 Views
GES 115 PROFESSIONALISM IN ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Spring 2007 Dr. Frank Joseph Matejcik. Ishikawa Diagrams Lab. Ishikawa Diagram Presentation. Other Ishikawa’s Person behind the method Show Visio Tool Classic Method (Activity) Dr. Frank’s Modified Method EI-PI Research Area.
E N D
GES 115 PROFESSIONALISM IN ENGINEERING AND SCIENCESpring 2007Dr. Frank Joseph Matejcik Ishikawa Diagrams Lab
Ishikawa Diagram Presentation • Other Ishikawa’s • Person behind the method • Show Visio Tool • Classic Method (Activity) • Dr. Frank’s Modified Method • EI-PI • Research Area
Nerdy Japanese Professor & Quality Guru • ASQ Award (for Humanity in Quality) • Four points that totally encompass the beliefs of Kaoru Ishikawa: • Revolution in the philosophy of management; that is, management in which humanity is respected. • Company Wide Quality Control. • Effective use of catch phrases that are adapted to the trend of the times. • Quality first concept; that is, customer satisfaction. Kaoru Ishikawa Does not like …
Nerdy Japanese Professor & Quality Guru • "QC begins with the interaction of people." • Quality Circles • eventually led to the development of team concepts around the world. • "Seven Tools of Quality“ • (1) histograms • (2) cause and effect diagrams (Fishbone) • (3) check sheets • (4) Pareto diagrams • (5) graphs • (6) control charts • (7) scatter diagrams Kaoru Ishikawa Only pic found
Ishikawa Diagram Classical Style • One Group Activity (No stopping rule) • Assumptions everyone in one room • Sometimes vote afterward • Ishikawa’s Book (Delicious Rice) • South Dakota (Delicious Hamburger)
Use Visio • Visio is under Microsoft Office on SDSM&T Machines • Use the top menu in this sequence to start File > New > Business Process> Cause and Effect Diagram
Frank J. Matejcik’sExtended Ishikawa (not Rika) • Works for Multiple site Questions / parallel work • Management Oriented not Publication Oriented • Additional samples by capture-recapture stats • Allows for dissent to be documented • Follow up recommendation method by QC • Sim class wants “Well written problems” • Topic: Why pick SDSM&T? • Student Life, Location, Cost • People, Academics, Opportunity
Matejcik’s Trial Procedure 0) Have group decide main bones & their place 1) Individually make Cause and Effect Diagrams 2) Make a group composite C & E diagram (no new contributions) 3) Complete a check sheet (mark last contribution) 4) Individually make additions sheets 5) Update the composite C & E diagram (only from additions sheets) 6) Update the contribution check sheet (Mark Last Contribution) 7) Stop or go to step 4) If stopped, vote or rank. DISSENT SHEETS CAN BE USED AT ANYTIME!
Cause and Effect Sheet • Group or Individual Name • Circle Group or Individual • Date • Topic • Space to draw
Additions/Dissent Sheet • Individual Name • Date • Topic • Round of Update • Addition or Descent • Space to draw
Check Sheet • Contains a table • Names run across the top • Segment terms run down the side
Additions Sheet • Individual Name • Round of additions • Date • Topic • Space to draw