1 / 19

CIVIL/MILITARY WORKSHOP FABCE ASM/ATFCM process Validation Plan Stjepan Varga Brussels , 20.09.2012

CIVIL/MILITARY WORKSHOP FABCE ASM/ATFCM process Validation Plan Stjepan Varga Brussels , 20.09.2012. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Step approach Distinction of ASM/ATFCM process and organisational enablers GO/NO GO to move next step Starting from national ASM/ATFCM integration process

lefty
Download Presentation

CIVIL/MILITARY WORKSHOP FABCE ASM/ATFCM process Validation Plan Stjepan Varga Brussels , 20.09.2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CIVIL/MILITARY WORKSHOP FABCE ASM/ATFCM process Validation Plan Stjepan Varga Brussels, 20.09.2012

  2. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN • Step approach • Distinction of ASM/ATFCM process and organisational enablers • GO/NO GO to move next step • Starting from national ASM/ATFCM integration process • Regional ASM/ATFCM process final goal • Organisational solution to be evaluated in due time • Timeframe to consider 2012-2015 for realistic implementation • Changes subject to validation before GO/NO GO decision.

  3. ATFCM/ASM Functional Models RTS • Model A - Optimizing the current situation • Role: Existing roles continue with additional FABCE Network management • Model B - Optimizing the current situation, applying LEAD AMC • Role: Existing roles continue with additional LAED AMC to support FABCE ASM management Live Trial • Model C - FABCE ATFCM coordination function, and national ASM • Role: A FABCE Network ATFCM Centre • Model D - FABCE ASM coordination function, and national ATFCM • Role: FABCE Network ASM Centre • Model E - FABCE ATFCM/ASM coordination function • Role: FABCE Network Operations Centre 3

  4. Live Trial 4

  5. High Level Objectives • Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures at national level; • Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures at FAB level using national Structures • Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures at FAB level using Lead AMC Concept • Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures between national structure/Lead AMCs and NM • Assess usability of different ASM planning and coordination tools, which could be applied in FAB CE operational environment;

  6. CZ SK AT HU HR BiH Geographical Scope • CZ YES – FL or Areas • AT YES – FL or Areas • SK YES – FL or Areas • HU YES – FL or Areas • SL YES – FL or Areas • HR YES – FL or Areas • BiH NO SL

  7. Procedures - Scope • D-7/D-2 • D-1 AUP

  8. FABCE – Potential Traffic on Night Segments if available H24 Traffic sample for Friday 14/10/2011 Numbers show flights on segment for the period 0500-2300

  9. FMP FMP AMC AMC FMP AMC NM FAB AD FMP FMP FMP FMP FP AMC FP FP AA AA AA AA AA AA AA MODEL A LARA NOP WEB PAGE

  10. Live trial positive feedback • Communication • Coordination among actors • Harmonisation of UQ 863 publication • FAB CE administrator • Rotation principle for FAB CE administrator • General Systems support feasible

  11. Live trial issues • Procedures • Respect timeline for uploading and publication • Respect of sequence of tasks • Confusion for weekend consolidation • Confusion for contingency procedure application (different procedures?) • Missed network coordination • NOP Publications • Status publish for national files (FMP) • Wrong information in files • Wrong templates • Confusion for D-2/6 files • Inconsistency of information (FAB AUP vs EAUP) • Systems • LARA connection – internet • NOP connection

  12. RTS 12

  13. NM FATFCM FMP AMC FMP AMC FMP AMC FMP FP AMC FMP FMP AMC FP FMP MODEL C AA AA AA AA AA AA AA

  14. NM FASM FMP AMC FMP AMC FMP AMC FMP FP AMC FMP FMP AMC FP FMP MODEL D AA AA AA AA AA AA AA

  15. FATFCM FASM NM FMP AMC FMP AMC FMP AMC FP FMP FMP AMC AMC FMP FMP FP MODEL E AA AA AA AA AA AA AA

  16. High Level Objectives • Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures at FAB level using FAB ATFCM coordinator • Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures at FAB level using FAB ASM coordinator • Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures at FAB level using FAB ASM/ATFCM coordinator • Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures between FAB ASM/ATFCM coordinator and NM

  17. Operational scenario • CDRs cross borders • CDR synchronisation • CBAs • ATFM scenarios • Alignment sector configurations/opening schemes • Alignment ATFM measures • Level capping • Re-routings FAB CE Airspace Plan

  18. Predict, NOP Predict, NOP Predict, NOP Predict, NOP Predict, NOP LARA, CIAM NOP LARA, CIAM NOP LARA, CIAM NOP LARA, CIAM NOP LARA, CIAM NOP RTS Technical Layout Predict, NOP LARA, CIAM NOP Predict, SIMEX, NOP Predict, SIMEX, NOP Predict, NOP LARA, CIAM NOP LARA, CIAM NOP LARA, CIAM NOP

  19. QUESTION?

More Related