1 / 48

Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance. Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Download Presentation

Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Quantifying Transportation Needsand Assessing Revenue Options:The Texas Experiencepresented toThe Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance Dr. David Ellis Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas Phone: 979.845.6165 E-mail: d-ellis@tamu.edu

  2. Two Efforts • The 2030 Committee to Determine Transportation Needs and Recommend Investment Level • The TRENDS Model to Assess Revenue Alternatives

  3. Analytical Process Current/Future Revenue Stream Current/Future Expense Stream The TRENDS Model Desired Mobility Level Investment Required The 2030 Committee Benefit/Cost Economic Impact

  4. The 2030 Committee Needs Assessment

  5. Needs Determination Process Summary • Travel demand models • Peak period speeds • Regular delay and incident/irregular delay • Calculate performance measures • Identify road sections over congestion threshold • Estimate road needed to accomplish scenario • Group by area type and functional class • Estimate cost for area/functional class additions • Add interchange and right-of-way costs

  6. Urban Mobility Analysis Overview Performance Measures • Peak and free-flow travel speed • Delay reductions from signal coordination, • access mgmt, incident clearance, ramp metering • Texas Congestion Index • Delay per “commuter” • Total delay and extra fuel costs

  7. Types of Benefits • Delay savings – compared to free-flow • Fuel savings – simple estimate (% of delay) • Reduced cost of goods and services (productivity) • Business Effects • Economic impact of construction • Business profitability & job creation • Local tax revenue

  8. Mobility Investment and Congestion Mitigation Cost (billions of $ 2008) Reduce Congestion Prevent Worsening Congestion Maintain Economic Competitiveness MINIMUM Current Funding Trend Inadequate Mobility Investment Delay Hours per Commuter in 2030

  9. Costs of Improvements and Congestion Costs in Billions (2008 $)

  10. Total Investment Needed: 2010 to 2030(in 2008 $) 2030 Need Area Investment Required Pavements $ 89 Billion Bridges $ 36 Billion Urban Mobility $ 171 Billion Rural Mobility and Safety Projects $ 17 Billion TOTAL $ 313 Billion

  11. The Transportation Revenue Estimator and Needs Determination System (TRENDS) Model

  12. Dynamic and InteractiveAnalytical Planning Tool • Web-based • Menu Driven • Allows User to Make Choices

  13. TRENDS Model Process • Gallons of Fuel Used • Population • Relationship of Fuel Used to Population • Fuel Efficiency • Fuel Used/Fuel Efficiency = VMT • Future Population yields Future Fuel Use and VMT

  14. The Relationship Between Gasoline Used and Population

  15. Relationship Between Diesel Fuel and Population

  16. 68 Variables • Taxes • Fees • Maintenance Levels • Fuel Economy • Inflation Rate • Population

  17. Report Formats • Tabular Form • Revenue and Expense Statement • Charts

  18. Backcasting Using the TRENDS Model Absolute Mean Value of Error: 1992-2008 Gasoline Revenues: 2.19 % Diesel Revenues: 2.68 % Registration Fee Revenues: 2.55 %

  19. Alternative Fuel Economy Scenarios

  20. Questions?

  21. David EllisResearch ScientistTexas Transportation InstituteThe Texas A&M University SystemCollege Station, Texas 77845979.845.6165d-ellis@tamu.edu

  22. Other Slides

  23. Annual Percent Increase in Texas: 1990 to 2007

  24. Texas Motor Fuels Tax Adjusted for Inflation

  25. Texas Motor Fuels Tax Adjusted by H.C.I.

  26. Average Fleetwide Fuel Efficiency in Texas: Gasoline Powered Vehicles

  27. Fuel Efficiency Adjusted Fuel Tax Paid (assuming 12,000 annual miles)

  28. Historical and Projected Fuel Tax Revenues Texas

  29. Over the next 20 years: • VMT is projected to increase 33 percent • Fuel tax revenue is projected to decrease 23 percent

  30. Vehicle Miles Traveled in the United States (in millions): 1936 through 2009 (Source: Federal Highway Administration)

  31. R-Squared Value - Price of Gasoline and Per Capita Consumption by Month August 1997 through July 2009

  32. Year-Over-Year Percent Change in Consumption of Gasoline Per Capita Versus Year-Over-Year in Percent Change in Gasoline Price in Texas (All Months - August 1997 through July 2009)

More Related