1 / 19

Educator Effectiveness Initiative

Educator Effectiveness Initiative. What We Need. Completed (Summer 2011) Added Sixth and Eighth Standards. In Progress (2011-12) Measures of Student Learning Design Process (Phase One of Three Completed). Targeted for Completion (March 2012)

lel
Download Presentation

Educator Effectiveness Initiative

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Educator Effectiveness Initiative

  2. What We Need Completed (Summer 2011) Added Sixth and Eighth Standards In Progress(2011-12) Measures of Student Learning Design Process (Phase One of Three Completed) Targeted for Completion(March 2012) Second Set of State Board Policies on Educator Effectiveness

  3. Key Elements • Yearly rating for teachers and administrators – Standards 6 and 8 • 2. Three rating categories • Does not meet expected growth • Meets expected growth • Exceeds expected growth

  4. Student Growth Value – 2012-13 • Administrators: average for all students • Teachers: three options for combining • Students (of the teacher) • School-wide (as above)

  5. Three Options The student growth value could be: 10% School-Wide 20% School-Wide 30% School-Wide 90% Individual 70% Individual 80% Individual

  6. Educator Effectiveness Work Group The Work Group members were divided between Option One (90% individual; 10% school-wide) and Option Three (70% individual; 30% school-wide)

  7. Questions that Guided Selection of Growth Model 1. Which student academic growth models demonstrate technical adequacy? Of those models that demonstrate technical adequacy, which meet other important criteria? Answer: EVAAS

  8. Value-Added Models Use links between teachers and their students Predict a student’s score on an assessment Attribute the difference between a predicted and actual score to above or below average instruction

  9. Sixth/Eighth Standard To determine effectiveness, a three-year rolling average of student growth values will be calculated: And a rating will be assigned: MEETS EXPECTED GROWTH

  10. In Need of Improvement • In Need of Improvement Rating: Status: And/or

  11. In Need of Improvement • In Need of Improvement Rating: Status: And/or

  12. Effective

  13. Effective

  14. Highly Effective

  15. Highly Effective

  16. Sample Summary Sheet for Educator Evaluation

  17. Display of All Information • Ratings on Standards 1 – 5 of the Educator Evaluation System (as recorded in online tool). • Yearly Standard 6 rating • Three-year rolling average of student growth values and accompanying Standard 6 rating (for effectiveness determination) • Overall teacher status

  18. Summary Sheet ADD

More Related