1 / 17

Educator Effectiveness Project

Educator Effectiveness Project. Update: January 24, 2012 SIS Meeting. Definition of Effective Educators (DPI).

majed
Download Presentation

Educator Effectiveness Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Educator Effectiveness Project Update: January 24, 2012 SIS Meeting

  2. Definition of Effective Educators (DPI) • Effective Teacher:An effective teacher consistently uses educational practices that foster the intellectual, social and emotional growth of children, resulting in measurable growth that can be documented in meaningful ways. • Effective Principal: An effective principal shapes school strategy and educational practices that foster the intellectual, social and emotional growth of children, resulting in measurable growth that can be documented in meaningful ways.

  3. Current Efforts in Wisconsin… • CESA #6: The Effectiveness Project – 3 areas: Teacher, Education Specialist, Principal; based on the work of Dr. James Stronge • Milwaukee School District – internal effectiveness effort focused on Danielson model and measuring student growth • Southeastern WI Teacher Evaluation Consortium (CESA #1, The Institute) – focused on transformational and transitional learning

  4. The DPI Process: • Focused on Teachers and Principals • Use of Danielson framework • District models will have to demonstrate alignment with Danielson’s 4 areas in order to obtain permission from DPI to use

  5. Design Questions (DPI) What are the purposes of the system? How will educator practice be evaluated? How will student achievement and other outcomes be incorporated? How will the evaluation process be administered? How will the model be implemented statewide?

  6. Teachers (DPI) Foundation for Teacher Practice Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Model Core Teaching Standards Framework for Teacher Evaluation Charlotte Danielson Domains and Components Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Domain 2: The Classroom Environment Domain 3: Instruction Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities

  7. Principals (DPI) Foundation for Principal Practice 2008 Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards Framework for Principal Evaluation Subordinate functions of ISLLC standards

  8. Education Specialists (CESA 6) Foundation for Education Specialist Practice Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Model Core Teaching Standards and 2008 Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards

  9. Who makes up the “Ed Specialist” Category? • School Psychologists • Social Workers • Instructional Coaches • Gifted/Talented Coordinators • Reading Coordinators • Counselors • Media Specialists • OT, PT, Speech and Language • CTE and School to Work Coordinators (25% of School Employees)

  10. Educator Practice (DPI) Teacher and Ed Specialist Practice Each component should be evaluated on multiple sources of evidence. These could include: • Observations of teacher practice • Review of documents • Surveys/data • Discussions with the teacher Principal Practice Each component should be evaluated on multiple sources of evidence. These could include: • Observations of principal practice • Review of documents • Interviews with stakeholders • Surveys/data • Discussions with the principal

  11. Category Ratings (DPI) Developing: does not meet expectations and requires additional support and directed action Effective: areas of strength and improvement addressed through professional development Exemplary: expand expertise through professional development and use expertise in leadership

  12. Collaboration between efforts: • CESA 6 is taking the lead for the Ed Specialist Effectiveness work • CESA 6 is working with DPI on the Principal Effectiveness work • DPI and SE WI are working on the Teacher Effectiveness design with input from CESA 6 • DPI working on Student Learning Objectives (SLO) in conjunction with other efforts • Design work to be completed by June 30, 2012 • Pilots take place in 2012-2013

  13. System Weights (DPI) Educator Practice Student Growth

  14. Student Outcome Detail (50% of evaluation) (DPI) Models of Practice Student Learning Objectives District Choice

  15. Mandatory Components: • The 50/50 model (50% on practice, 50% on student achievement) • Three-tiered rating scale-developing-effective-exemplary

  16. Educator Effectiveness Timeline (DPI) 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

  17. Questions??? • Probably still more questions than answers!!! • Thanks for your time!!!

More Related