1 / 60

We’re not in Kansas anymore…part 2

We’re not in Kansas anymore…part 2. Public Transparency and Accountability: A Threat, or an Opportunity?. Marc P. Volavka Executive Director . Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council. What I’ll try and do:. Three points: 1) a bit about the history of the Council;

leland
Download Presentation

We’re not in Kansas anymore…part 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. We’re not in Kansas anymore…part 2

  2. Public Transparency and Accountability: A Threat, or an Opportunity? Marc P. Volavka Executive Director Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council

  3. What I’ll try and do: Three points: 1) a bit about the history of the Council; 2) a bit about public reporting and transparency; 3) a bit about hospital acquired infections.

  4. About PHC4 • Independent state agency established in 1986 • Improve the quality and restrain the cost of health care by PUBLICLY releasing data and reports • Promote competition in the health care marketplace

  5. Sounds a bit like a 1980’s version of “transparency”, doesn’t it?

  6. Purchasers 6 Business 6 Labor 1 Consumer Insurers 1 Commercial 1 Non-Profit (Blues) 1 HMO Providers 2 Hospital 2 Physician 1 Nurse 1 Health Care Quality Improvement Expert State Government Secretary of Health Secretary of Welfare Insurance Commissioner Council Members

  7. PHC4 Data Sources: • 178 Acute Care Hospitals representing about 1.9 million inpatient admissions • Over 200 Surgery Centers representing about 2.5 million visits • Third party insurers, including Medicare and Medicaid

  8. What data do we collect? • 4 million inpatient hospital discharge & ambulatory procedure records/year • More than 80 data fields available • Hospital Financial and Utilization Data • Actual payment from 3rd party payors Updated 10/20/03

  9. Public Reports • Hospital Performance Report • Heart Bypass Report (physician specific) • Hospital Financial Report • Commercial Managed Care Report • Medicare Managed Care Report • Diabetes Hospitalization Report • Hip & Knee replacement (physician specific) • Hospital Acquired Infections

  10. Transparency and Consumerism? When the Federal Government speaks, it must be so!

  11. News Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEThursday, June 1, 2006 Medicare Posts Hospital Payment Information Important Step Toward Transparency in Health Care Costs and Quality To help consumers, providers, and payers make more informed health care decisions, the Department of Health and Human Services through its Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) today posted information on what Medicare pays for 30 common elective procedures and other hospital admissions. President Bush directed the data be made publicly available to all Americans as part of the Administration’s commitment to make health care more affordable and accessible. “Once people gain better information, they become better consumers of health care and that helps get health care costs down and quality of care up,” HHS Secretary “Once people gain better information, they become better consumers of health care and that helps get health care costs down and quality of care up,” HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt said. “The federal government is the biggest single purchaser of health care in America, and by taking steps to post prices and quality data, we hope to encourage more insurance companies, hospitals, clinics and doctors to do the same.”

  12. Question: What does “consumerism” and “transparency” mean in the world of 2006??

  13. Answer: (2 more questions) • How much is it gonna cost me? • Am I gonna be ok? (and, probably in that order)

  14. And, although I know this will come as a SHOCK to you, the Federal Government wasn’t the first to “discover” transparency, even in pricing!

  15. So, here’s a riddle for your amusement: When does HIPPA prevent a major 3rd party insurer from providing payment data to PHC4??

  16. Answer: Prior to August 17th, 2005… When their legal counsel says so!

  17. Now: When does HIPPA ALLOW a major 3rd party insurer from providing payment data to PHC4??

  18. Answer: After August 18th, 2005…When their legal counsel says so!

  19. Insurer Reveals What Doctors Really Charge To Help People Compare Fees, Aetna Posts Some Online;A Potential Bargaining Tool By VANESSA FUHRMANS Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNALAugust 18, 2005 The growing effort to enlist consumers in reducing health-care costs has been stymied by the fact that most people just don't know what medical care costs. Private and government health coverage has helped shield them from bills. And even with newer consumer-driven plans that employ Health Savings Accounts, which give people more of a financial stake in the issue, pricing information can be hard to come by. Now, a major national health insurer is making an effort to change that. Starting tomorrow, Aetna Inc. plans to make available online the exact prices Starting tomorrow, Aetna Inc. plans to make available online the exact prices it has negotiated with Cincinnati-area doctors for hundreds of medical procedures and tests. The initiative, which Aetna hopes to take eventually to other parts of the country, aims to give patients the tools to comparison shop and make savvier decisions with their health-care dollars.

  20. Notice the date?

  21. In Pennsylvania, with PHC4, we’ve been answering one of the questions (quality) for awhile, and we’re now starting to answer the other one (pricing)…

  22. This is what “transparency”looked like, with our first report on hospital performance, in 1989:

  23. We’ve come a long way since then:

  24. Since 1989, we’ve been demonstrating that you CAN bring some public disclosure to hospital and physician “quality”.

  25. A study to be released today by the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council echoes her questions. It found that readmissions at hospitals across the commonwealth rose last year even as death rates declined.

  26. But, does it really matter?

  27. At the same time, the council reported significant improvement in a key quality measure – deaths. Overall, the death rates in Pennsylvania’s hospitals in the categories examined have declined faster than the national average since 1991, the report said.

  28. Here’s what we believe 20 years of “transparency” have contributed to in Pennsylvania:

  29. “Now we face the harder job of making changes in the processes of care at our hospitals to reduce infection rates, complications of care, medical errors and patient readmissions,” said David B. Nash, chairman of the department of health policy at Jefferson Medical College. Despite some limitations to this report, experts said public disclosure of quality paid off. “There is growing evidence that in states with public reporting on health-care quality, mortality is lower and got there faster,” Nash said.

  30. Now, I’ll fully admit that risk adjusted CABG mortality, or risk adjusted LOS aren’t exactly flowing off the tongues of PA consumers!

  31. But, Hospital acquired infections…Now THAT got peoples attention!

  32. Data Show Scourge of Hospital Infections Alarms raised on hospital infections

  33. That wasn’t so much of a surprise…

  34. But, I also got some interesting Fed Ex packages with “solutions”…

  35. These were a surprise!!

  36. Let me show you what caught the nations attention, when we reported HAI’s on a Statewide basis, in July of 2005:

  37. 11,668 patients were confirmed by PA hospitals as having 4 types of HAI (using CDC guidelines) • 1793 died • 1510 deaths were above what would have been expected • 205,000 extra days in the hospital • $2 BILLION in extra hospital billing that was sent to someone to pay

  38. And, the national media got the two key points:

  39. Hospital-acquired infections are deadly.

  40. For 2004, in PA: 1,000 Patients (Who get an HAI) 130 Die 1,000 Patients (No HAI) 24 Die Additional Deaths 104 Additional Deaths Per 1,000 Patients

  41. In other words, if you got an infection in a PA hospital in 2004, the odds of dieing during that hospitalization were 5.41 greater than if you didn’t. I Don’t Like Those Odds!!!!

  42. Second…

  43. The costs of hospital-acquired infections are staggering.

  44. In 2004, PA received ACTUAL payment data from our 3rd party commercial insurers…not charges…PAYMENTS!

  45. We linked hospital confirmed HAI patients with the ACTUAL payments made for each of those patients…

More Related