150 likes | 281 Views
Q2010 Helsinki. European Conference on quality in Official Statistics. A quality evaluation analysis of the Italian Business Register of Enterprise Groups. Session 27: Use of administrative sources I Helsinki 5 May 2010. Fulvia Cerroni - Serena Migliardo - Enrica Morganti
E N D
Q2010 Helsinki European Conference on quality in Official Statistics A quality evaluation analysis of the Italian Business Register of Enterprise Groups Session 27: Use of administrative sources I Helsinki 5 May 2010 Fulvia Cerroni - Serena Migliardo - Enrica Morganti Italian National Institute of Statistics
A quality evaluation analysis of the Italian BR on EGs Agenda • Backgrounds • Data quality Management • The sources and the process • Quality of the input • Quality of the process • Quality of the output • Conclusions 5 May 2010
A quality evaluation analysis of the Italian BR on EGs Backgrounds • use of administrative archives in place of statistical surveys • reducing the statistical burden • From 1999 first model result of meetings with experts, academic and administrative providers • EGs year 2003 are disseminated • From 2004 profiling activity on largest EGs • From 2005 Inward FATS integrated into BR • reengineering of the process 5 May 2010
A quality evaluation analysis of the Italian BR on EGs Data Quality management • Data Quality Management • From 2005 a system of quality indicators as a Quality Report • A three step approach: input/process/output 5 May 2010
A quality evaluation analysis of the Italian BR on EGs The sources and the process (1) Stock Exchange contains: all relevant shareholders of listed shared companies information structure: bottom-up / top down Chamber of Commerce contains all shareholders of non listed shared companies information structure: bottom-up Annual Reports contains: list of consolidated enterprises by Italian Group Heads Also foreign subsidiaries are included information structure: top down 5 May 2010
A quality evaluation analysis of the Italian BR on EGs The sources and the process (2) • Preconditions: • same linking key • same timeliness • same information content • Integration of the administrative sources • Checking and validation procedures • Inward Fats survey • Italian top 50 EGs • EGs with at least 500 employees • Enterprise with at least 250 employees in ASIA (BR of Active enterprises) 5 May 2010
STEP = INPUT A quality evaluation analysis of the Italian BR on EGs ACCURACY TIMELINESS 5 May 2010
STEP = PROCESS (1) A quality evaluation analysis of the Italian BR on EGs ACCURACY (1) 5 May 2010
STEP = PROCESS (2) A quality evaluation analysis of the Italian BR on EGs ACCURACY (2) 5 May 2010
STEP = PROCESS (3) A quality evaluation analysis of the Italian BR on EGs INWARD FATS survey ACCURACY (3) Manual checks TIMELINESS 5 May 2010
STEP = OUTPUT A quality evaluation analysis of the Italian BR on EGs ACCURACY TIMELINESS 5 May 2010
STEP = OUTPUT A quality evaluation analysis of the Italian BR on EGs • Internal users / external users • 5 years are available and comparable • Benchmark to check MNEs on EGR • Timeliness / accuracy • Sometimes accept lower accuracy in order to reduce timeliness • Cost for quality maintenance : • cost for source acquisition • cost for high skilled resources ACCESSIBILITY COHERENCE OUTPUT QUALITY TRADE OFF PERFORMANCE, COST RESPONDENT BURDEN 5 May 2010
STEP = OUTPUT A quality evaluation analysis of the Italian BR on EGs • Inward FATS survey statistics • International trade • National Accounts • EGR project • Eurostat • External users requests USERS NEEDS 5 May 2010
A quality evaluation analysis of the Italian BR on EGs Conclusions • Strengths of Italian BR on EGs • Standardized process • Integration and complementary of input sources • Data monitored annually by source and by step process • Weakness • Change in data providers • Stakeholders needs • Timeliness • Human resources • Solutions • good relationship / maintenance of stability and continuity of the data flow • active role of Istat with administrative bodies detaining data 5 May 2010
Thank you for your attention For further information: Fulvia Cerroni: cerroni@istat.it Serena Migliardo: migliard@istat.it Enrica Morganti: enmorgan@istat.it 5 May 2010