230 likes | 339 Views
Acknowledgments. Michael Rubin, MD, PhDKim Bateman, MDBrian Sauer, PhDLucy Savitz, PhDTom Greene, PhDR. Scott Evans, PhDRandall Rupper, MD, MPH. Salt Lake VA Informatics, Decision Enhancement, ,and Surveillance (IDEAS) Center Selected Investigators and CollaboratorsJonathan Nebeker, MDCharl
E N D
1. Experience in improving healthcare decision-making with health IT: integrating theory, research, and practice Matthew Samore, MD
VA Salt Lake City Health Care System
Professor of Internal Medicine
Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Informatics
University of Utah
2. Acknowledgments Michael Rubin, MD, PhD
Kim Bateman, MD
Brian Sauer, PhD
Lucy Savitz, PhD
Tom Greene, PhD
R. Scott Evans, PhD
Randall Rupper, MD, MPH Salt Lake VA Informatics, Decision Enhancement, ,and Surveillance (IDEAS) Center Selected Investigators and Collaborators
Jonathan Nebeker, MD
Charlene Weir, PhD
Frank Drews, PhD
3. Thesis of this talk Theory and models provide scientific underpinnings for generalization
Which supports comparative effectiveness research
For health services research and epidemiology:
Use of models understood
For clinical decision support:
Not so much
Health information technology ? informatics
Sub-disciplines such as cognitive informatics crucial
4. More succinctly expressed: “The difference between theory and practice is that in theory there is no difference but in practice there is”
5. Statement of the problem: “A disproportionate amount of literature on the benefits [of health information technology] that have been realized comes from a small set of early-adopter institutions that implemented internally developed health information technology systems..”
6. Addressing generalizability In what contexts will effects generalize?
What accounts for variability in results?
Why are impacts lower in magnitude or narrower in scope in larger trials compared to single institution studies?
How to incorporate information about implementation, adoption, formative evaluation?
7. Relevance to comparative effectiveness research (CER) CER priorities
Directly focused on health information technology
Compare the effectiveness of alternative redesign strategies—using decision support capabilities, electronic health records, personal health records
Indirectly tied to health information technology
Compare the effectiveness of various strategies
To control MRSA
To control healthcare associated infection
To enhance patients’ adherence to medication regimens
8. Addressing CER challenges Need to explicitly formulate causal question
Determining identifiability
Defining level of inference
Validating methods to reduce bias
9. Conceptual frameworks (THEORY) Natural & engineered systems
Co-evolution
Cognitive processing
Information overload ? fit-to-workflow
Cyclical models of control
Feedback and feed-forward
10. System co-evolution Fundamental theorem in informatics
C. Friedman J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:169-170
Proposed modification:
Computers plus humans create a distinct socio-technical system
Characteristics are not equivalent to other industries
11. Relevance Level of inference needed to assess causal effect of health information technology:
Socio-technical system
Potential benefits of simulation
12. Cognitive processing Motivation, mental models, tasks, goals
Influenced by social context
Lack of fit-to-workflow experienced as:
Information overload
Interruptions
13. Relevance Cognitive informatics methods
Task analysis
Direct observation
Match implementation strategy to task complexity
14. Second law of thermodynamics as applied to cognition: Humans seek states of reduced cognitive effort
Workarounds
As cognitive load increases, automatic processing systems kick-in
15. For those who believe that there is a Simpson’s quote for every situation “In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
Homer Simpson’s response when his daughter builds a perpetual motion machine in which energy increases with time
16. Contextual Control Model Feed-back systems not sufficient
Need to anticipate and predict
Pure feedback systems subject to loss of stability
Time horizon is long in strategic control modes
Relevance
Link between decision support and surveillance
Surveillance contributes feedback and feed-forward capabilities
17. Feedback & feed-forward decision support
18. Illustrative experience with decision support for antimicrobial prescribing Two different technologies studied
Clinical task:
Management of patient with acute respiratory infection in outpatient setting
Whether or not to prescribe an antibiotic
Choosing the antibiotic
Diagnostic label
Impact of perceived or actual patient demand
19. Application of theory to practiceimplementation of electronic health records in rural settings Socio-technical system
Hook was electronic prescribing
Stepwise approach to adoption
Accommodating variation
Readiness to change
Social context and clinic culture
Encouraging play
Avoiding information overload
20. Community intervention plus clinical decision support system Standalone algorithms on handheld computers
Community randomized trial
21. Clinical decision support system integrated with computerized clinic order entry Algorithm usually triggered by ordering antibiotic
Clinic randomized trial
22. Interpretation Deciding whether to prescribe an antibiotic and choosing the drug involve different cognitive processes
Given that decision to prescribe an antibiotic is made
Possible to embed correct choice in workflow
Feed-forward decision support needed to impact the “is this a situation that warrants an antibiotic” decision
Relevant to drug-drug interaction alerting
23. Recommendations and conclusions Models fundamental to translation of research into practice
Incorporation of theory and models into comparative effectiveness research
Role of simulation