1 / 44

The Chemistry of Extrasolar Planetary Systems

The Chemistry of Extrasolar Planetary Systems. J. Bond, D. O’Brien and D. Lauretta. Extrasolar Planets. First detected in 1995 374 known planets Host stars appear metal-rich, esp. Fe Similar trends in Mg, Si, C, O, Ti, Al, Na, Mn , Co, Ni, Sc, V, Cu, Zr and Nd.

lenora
Download Presentation

The Chemistry of Extrasolar Planetary Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Chemistry of Extrasolar Planetary Systems J. Bond, D. O’Brien and D. Lauretta

  2. Extrasolar Planets First detected in 1995 374 known planets Host stars appear metal-rich, esp. Fe Similar trends in Mg, Si, C, O, Ti, Al, Na, Mn, Co, Ni, Sc, V, Cu, Zr and Nd Santos et al. (2003)

  3. Host Star Enrichment Elemental abundances are in keeping with galactic evolutionary trends No correlation with planetary parameters Enrichment is PRIMORDIAL not photospheric pollution

  4. SiC SiO MgSiO3 + SiO2 Mg2SiO4 + MgO MgSiO3 + Mg2SiO4

  5. Two Big Questions • Are terrestrial planets likely to exist in known extrasolar planetary systems? • What would they be like?

  6. ?

  7. Chemistry meets Dynamics • Most dynamical studies of planetesimal formation have neglected chemical constraints • Most chemical studies of planetesimal formation have neglected specific dynamical studies • This issue has become more pronounced with studies of extrasolar planetary systems which are both dynamically and chemically unusual • Combine dynamical models of extrasolar terrestrial planet formation with chemical equilibrium models of the condensation of solids in the protoplanetary nebulae

  8. Dynamical simulations reproduce the terrestrial planets • Use very high resolution n-body accretion simulations of terrestrial planet accretion (e.g. O’Brien et al. 2006) • Start with 25 Mars mass embryos and ~1000 planetesimals from 0.3 AU to innermost giant planet • Incorporate dynamical friction • Neglects mass loss

  9. Equilibrium thermodynamics predict bulk compositions of planetesimals Davis (2006)

  10. Equilibrium thermodynamics predict bulk compositions of planetesimals • Consider 16 elements: H, He, C, N, O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, S, Ca, Ti, Cr, Fe, Ni • Assign each embryo and planetesimal a composition based on formation region • Adopt the P-T profiles of Hersant et al (2001) at 7 time steps (0.25 – 3 Myr) • Assume no volatile loss during accretion, homogeneity and equilibrium is maintained

  11. “Ground Truthing” • Consider a Solar System simulation: • 1.15 MEarth at 0.64AU • 0.81 MEarth at 1.21AU • 0.78 MEarth at 1.69AU

  12. Results

  13. Results • Reasonable agreement with planetary abundances • Values are within 1 wt%, except for Mg, O, Fe and S • Normalized deviations: • Na (up to 4x) • S (up to 3.5x) • Water rich (CJS) • Geochemical ratios (Al/Si and Mg/Si) between Earth and Mars

  14. Extrasolar “Earths” • Apply same methodology to extrasolar systems • Use spectroscopic photospheric abundances (H, He, C, N, O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, S, Ca, Ti, Cr, Fe, Ni) • No planetesimals • Assumed closed systems

  15. Assumptions In-situ formation (dynamics) Inner region formation (dynamics) Snapshot approach; sensitive to the timing of condensation (chemistry) PRELIMINARY SIMULATIONS!

  16. Extrasolar “Earths” • Terrestrial planets formed in ALL systems studied • Most <1 Earth-mass within 2AU of the host star • Often multiple terrestrial planets formed • Low degrees of radial mixing

  17. Extrasolar “Earths” • HD72659 – 0.95 MSUN G star • 3.30 MJ planet at 4.16AU • Gl777A – 1.04 MSUN G star • 0.06 MJ planet at 0.13AU • 1.50 MJ planet at 3.92AU • HD108874 – 1.00 MSUN G star • 1.36 MJ planet at 1.05AU • 1.02 MJ planet at 2.68AU

  18. Extrasolar “Earths”

  19. HD72659

  20. HD72659 1.35 MEarth at 0.89AU

  21. HD72659

  22. HD72659 1.53 MEarth at 0.38AU

  23. HD72659 1.53 M Earth 0.38 AU 1.53 MEarth 1.35 M Earth 0.89 AU 1.35 MEarth

  24. Gl777A

  25. Gl 777A 0.27 wt% C 1.10 MEarth at 0.89AU

  26. HD108874

  27. HD108874 0.46 MEarth at 0.38AU 27 wt% C 66 wt% C

  28. HD108874 0.46 MEarth at 0.38AU 66 wt% 27 wt%

  29. Two Classes • Earth-like & refractory compositions (HD72659) • C-rich compositions (Gl777A, HD108874)

  30. HD108874 SiC Gl777 SiO HD72659 MgSiO3 + SiO2 Mg2SiO4 + MgO MgSiO3 + Mg2SiO4

  31. Implications Plate tectonics Atmospheric composition Biology Detectability

  32. Habitability 10 Earth-like and 3 C-enriched planets produced in habitable zone Ideal targets for future surveys; Kepler

  33. Water Worlds? All planets form “dry” Giant planet migration is likely to increase water content Exogenous delivery and adsorption limited in C-rich systems Hydrous species Water vapor restricted

  34. Mass Distribution Carbide phases are refractory in nature Alternative mass distribution may be needed with high C systems

  35. Mass Distribution

  36. Where to next? Migration simulations Hypothetical giant planet systems M-dwarfs Difficult to obtain stellar abundances Alternative mass distributions Require detailed disk models Planetary structures and processes Equations of state for unusual compositions

  37. Take-Home Message Extrasolar planetary systems are enriched but with normal evolutions Two main types of planets: Earth-like C-rich Wide variety of planetary and astrobiological implications

  38. There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the universe, and it has a longer shelf life. Frank Zappa Frank Zappa

More Related