320 likes | 532 Views
UDL As Framework For Professional Development. Date: June 1 st , 2011. Charles Rathbone, Universal Design for Learning Grant, UVM Ellen McShane , Director, Academic Support Program, UVM Judith Christensen , Woodside Juvenile Rehabilitation Center, SOV. UDL as framework for.
E N D
UDL As Framework For Professional Development Date: June 1st, 2011 • Charles Rathbone, Universal Design for Learning Grant, UVM Ellen McShane, Director, Academic Support Program, UVM Judith Christensen, Woodside Juvenile Rehabilitation Center, SOV Better Learning by Design 2011
UDL as framework for • Part One: Improving university teaching / learning for students with disabilities • Part Two: Improving residential treatment for adjudicated youth • Part Three: Improving university academic support programs for all students Better Learning by Design 2011
A way of thinking about teaching and learning in classroom settings • recent research in cognition and neuroscience of learning • knowledge, skills, and enthusiasm for learning for all individuals • rich supports for learning • reduces barriers to the curriculum • high standards Better Learning by Design 2011
Learning SystemsLinked to UDL Principles • Recognition • Strategic • Affective/Emotional Better Learning by Design 2011
Part One Working With University Faculty C. Rathbone Better Learning by Design 2011
Consultation Process • Collaborative • Staged • Referral Process / Intake • UDL Review, Reflection, Recommendations • Action Plan Development, Implementation, Evaluation • Follow-Up • Responsive • Expert knowledge in faculty • Strategic knowledge in team • Data Based • Open Ended • Multiple Options Better Learning by Design 2011
The UVM UDL Model Better Learning by Design 2011
Representation Rating sheet showing principle subcategories and dimensions of practice (Intentionality and Weight) Better Learning by Design 2011
Action Plan Document showing how UDL modification occurs during consult Better Learning by Design 2011
UDL Wheel Course Analysis Relative presence of each UDL Principle for a set of reviewed documents for a given course Better Learning by Design 2011
To Date • UVM faculty attitude data show (N=108) • Most faculty know little about UDL • Most faculty acknowledge the need • Most faculty would like to improve • Twenty+ consultees across five units including one teamed course • Preliminary data • Shifts in practice • Faculty like the process • Student data “in process” • Anecdotal student data positive Better Learning by Design 2011
Examples of shifts for faculty • Clearer syllabi – organization, alignment • Connecting course content with student information about selves • More choices for students in completing assignments • More modeling by faculty of what they expect in terms of student work • Clearer assessment guidelines by faculty • Increased group work with clearer directions about how to do groupwork: roles, presenting • Surge in faculty awareness of why students don’t get it • Enhanced passion for teaching Better Learning by Design 2011
Part Two Woodside Juvenile Rehabilitation Center Putting UDL to Work Judith Christensen Better Learning by Design 2011
What is Woodside? • Operated by Dept. for Children & Families • Serves male & female adolescents from all over Vermont • Vermont’s only secure program • Legislature recently “repurposed” as a psychiatric, mental health and substance abuse treatment program • Still limited to 10 up to 18 youth in the juvenile justice system • Can serve up to 28 (30 with CO approval) Better Learning by Design 2011
Woodside School • Serves all youth regardless of length of stay • 504/special education eligibility is common, but varies drastically in the population • Common Student Characteristics: • Significant history of academic challenges • Increasing documentation of behavioral and academic problems over time • Decreasing motivation: What good is it? • Increasing marginalization: I can’t be successful anyway • Each student is a “class” = 28 different lesson plans • Some “group” lessons are possible Better Learning by Design 2011
UDL at Woodside • Gaining Teacher commitment: • Completed module 1 as a group • Group discussion at monthly teacher’s meeting • Supposed to take 4 to 6 hours per person • Took from June through September to do this • Each teacher would then do the “Final Assignment: http://udlonline.cast.org/page/module1/l251/ Better Learning by Design 2011
UDL at Woodside • Teacher commitment was OK at that point • Liked what they saw as a group… • but the module still did not relate closely enough to their own work • The final assignment relied on using a lesson plan of their own or an example and the Educator Checklist • Problem: Teachers thought they were already doing it “naturally” – why formalize it? Better Learning by Design 2011
UDL at Woodside – More to come… • Teachers are working on Module 2 individually http://udlonline.cast.org/page/module2/l3/ OR • Can use a newer UDL website based on Guidelines 2.0 http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/whatisudl http://www.udlcenter.org/implementation/examples Or other related websites such as http://www.readwritethink.org/classroom-resources/ • Plan is to “show and tell” successes and learning from experience…. Better Learning by Design 2011
Woodside – so far • Representation • Find images that work • Relate to real life Better Learning by Design 2011
Woodside – so far • Expression – choice! • Student posters on “How can we protect essential water?” unit – see example • Each one took a piece of the question • Invasive species • Phosphorus • Other toxins Better Learning by Design 2011
Woodside – so far • Engagement – choice again! • Student choice on project • Student choice on how to convey information • Poster • Speech • Paper • Any combination… • Variable “deadlines” There is no end in sight!!! This is a PROCESS, not a PRODUCT Better Learning by Design 2011
Part Three Improving university academic support systems for all students E. McShane Better Learning by Design 2011
Academic Support Services • ACCESS: Students with disabilities • TRIO/SSS: First generation, limited income, and students with disabilities • LEARNING COOPERATIVE: tutoring etc. Better Learning by Design 2011
ASP Professional Development • Trained ASP staff on the principles of UDL • Brainstormed use of the principles • Developed a list of projects • Train new staff on UDL for a common language Better Learning by Design 2011
Stress Emerged as an Issue • How can we minimize stress for students? • Could we infuse play? • Looked at our offices • Lighting • Artwork • Plants • Comfortable chairs • Service dog Better Learning by Design 2011
How to Reduce Student Stress? • Printed Materials and Web Site • User-centered • Utilize images • Call to action • Use concept maps when appropriate • Create “how to” brochures • Exam Proctoring Center, Notes, Captioning, Tutoring Better Learning by Design 2011
How to Reduce Student Stress? • ELL supports • Provide notes • Extended time on tests • Captioning of videos • Peer mentoring: Cultural Cats • Tutoring: Learning Skills • Web supports: Balabolka; Word Web; Read, Write, Gold Better Learning by Design 2011
How to Reduce Student Stress? • Executive Functions • Study Skills • Time Management • Online access • Learning and Motivation Strategies Course • Transition from High School to College Better Learning by Design 2011
How to Reduce Staff Stress? • Workshop on food, nutrition, and health • Create a safe space as a team • Restorative Practices • Use of circles • Talking piece • Understanding of the impact of shame • Norms that allow all to participate Better Learning by Design 2011
Outcomes • Served over 2,500 students a year • ASP had over 14,000 contacts for a year • Satisfaction surveys are positive • UVM support continues to grow • Focusing on retention as an ASP effort Better Learning by Design 2011