220 likes | 379 Views
CHAPTER 1. STOCK AND FLOW. Blair Grace Kylie Hurst Stephen McDonald. 2012 Annual Report—35th Edition. Figure 1.3. Figure 1.4. Figure 1.5. Figure 1.6. Figure 1.7. Figure 1. 11. Figure 1. 12. Figure 1. 14. Comparison of Transplant and Dialysis Dependent Patients 200 6 - 20 10
E N D
ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2012 CHAPTER 1 STOCK AND FLOW Blair Grace Kylie Hurst Stephen McDonald 2012 Annual Report—35th Edition
ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2012 Figure 1.3
ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2012 Figure 1.4
ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2012 Figure 1.5
ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2012 Figure 1.6
ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2012 Figure 1.7
ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2012 Figure 1.11
ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2012 Figure 1.12
ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2012 Figure 1.14 Comparison of Transplant and Dialysis Dependent Patients 2006 - 2010 Note: Y scales vary between states
ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2012 Figure 1.14 Comparison of Transplant and Dialysis Dependent Patients 2006 - 2010 Note: Y scales vary between states
ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2012 Figure 1.14 Comparison of Transplant and Dialysis Dependent Patients 2006 - 2010 Note: Y scales vary between states
ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2012 Figure 1.14 Comparison of Transplant and Dialysis Dependent Patients 2006 - 2010 Note: Y scales vary between states
ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2012 Figure 1.14 Comparison of Transplant and Dialysis Dependent Patients 2006 - 2010 Note: Y scales vary between states
ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2012 Figure 1.14 Comparison of Transplant and Dialysis Dependent Patients 2006 - 2010 Note: Y scales vary between states
ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2012 Figure 1.14 Comparison of Transplant and Dialysis Dependent Patients 2006 - 2010 Note: Y scales vary between states
ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2012 Figure 1.14 Comparison of Transplant and Dialysis Dependent Patients 2006 - 2010 Note: Y scales vary between states