1 / 33

Saad El-Zanati Cynthia Langrall Wendy O’Hanlon Ryan Bunge Illinois State University

Teacher-Scholars: Research Experiences for Pre-Service and In-Service Secondary Mathematics Teachers. Saad El-Zanati Cynthia Langrall Wendy O’Hanlon Ryan Bunge Illinois State University. Supported by Division of Undergraduate Education Award # A0633335. Teacher-Scholars.

les
Download Presentation

Saad El-Zanati Cynthia Langrall Wendy O’Hanlon Ryan Bunge Illinois State University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Teacher-Scholars: Research Experiences for Pre-Service and In-Service Secondary Mathematics Teachers Saad El-Zanati Cynthia Langrall Wendy O’Hanlon Ryan Bunge Illinois State University Supported by Division of Undergraduate Education Award # A0633335

  2. Teacher-Scholars . . . • are teacher education graduates who have experienced scholarship in mathematics • have an understanding of what mathematics is and how it is discovered or created • have the confidence and ability to engage students in thinking about rich mathematical ideas

  3. Why? • Majority of undergraduate mathematics majors at Illinois State are in secondary education. • Talented hard-working students who want to be teachers.

  4. Rationale • National need for highly-qualified mathematics teachers • Call for undergraduate experiences in which students “participate in original, supervised research” (NRC, 1999, p. 6)

  5. Program History • Spring 2004: 9 students (6 Sec. Ed.) – Two research articles. • Spring 2005: 15 students (11 Sec. Ed.) --Two research articles. • Spring 2006: 9 students (8 Sec. Ed.) --Follow-up work has led to a successful student-faculty collaboration. • Three Applications to NSF (El-Zanati & McCrone) --The third was funded!

  6. Prior to Funding • Set up an ISU Foundation Account (within Math Dept Account), with purpose of supporting undergraduate research. • Recognized students at Departmental Awards Ceremony as “Teacher-Scholars” with a certificate & a small amount of cash! • Solicited support from chair & colleagues

  7. Funded-Program Overview • Year-long • Two junior/senior-level capstone courses: Introduction to Undergraduate Research in Mathematics (spring), Undergraduate Research in Mathematics II (fall) • Summer component

  8. What We’ve Done Year 1 – Course I (Spring 2007) • 19 participants, 15 were secondary mathematics education majors • Course topics: proof techniques, some history of mathematics, Exercises that lead to open problems in number theory, graph theory, and combinatorial design theory • Three groups were able to obtain original results (patterns that apply to an infinite number of cases)

  9. Course Components: • Open-ended assignments • Regular homework assignments • Take-home tests (including an infamous midterm) • Group research projects • Group teaching modules • Poster presentations at ISU Undergraduate Research Symposium

  10. Student Research Topics • Scheduling (e.g., Social Golfer Problem) • Graph Designs (e.g., Graph Decompositions & Graph Factorizations) • Graph labelings (Various labelings & their design applications) • Graph Coloring • Vector Space Partitions

  11. Social Golfer Problem: • Twelve friends play golf in groups of four. How many rounds must they play in order to ensure that each person plays with everyone else at least once? • Fix the number of days and come up with a “fair” schedule. • Vary the question. Come up with your own questions.

  12. Vector Space Partition Problem: • For what values of x and y can you “partition” (Z2)6 into x subspaces of dim 2 and y subspaces of dim 3 that share only the zero vector? • For what values of x and y can you “partition” 2(Z2)5 into x subspaces of dim 2 and y subspaces of dim 3 that share only the zero vector? • Vary the question. Come up with your own questions.

  13. Summer Component • Proposed: Three two-day meetings at three week intervals. Rationale: maintaining students’ interest in program. • Reality: Unable to give sufficient incentive for students to return. Five students returned for a one day meeting.

  14. Year 1 – Course II (Fall 2007) • 9 students returned, 8 secondary education majors (all had made progress on a project) • Focus on finalizing and writing results from spring research (three research articles) • Development of teaching modules

  15. Research Articles from 2007 TSP: • G. Blair, D. Bowman, S. I. El-Zanati, S. Hlad, M. Priban, K. Sebesta, On Cyclic (Cm+e)-designs, Ars Combinatoria, to appear. • E. Butzen, S. I. El-Zanati, A. Modica, R. Schrishuhn, On rho-labeling up to ten vertex-disjoint C4x+1, J. Comb. Math. & Comb. Computing, to appear. • S. I. El-Zanati, B. Frank, B. Renziger, On gamma-labeling the intersection graph of odd cycles, to be submitted.

  16. Year Two - Course I (Spring 2008) • Taught by Olcay Akman (statistician) • Emphasis on mathematical & statistical modeling • 16 students (13 in Secondary Ed.) • Data analysis from an ongoing ecology research project • 1 research article accepted

  17. Year 2-Course II (Fall 2008) • One Summer Meeting • Only 3 students in Course II • Course II covered NEW topics • Another research article • No room to fit a second “elective” course in students’ schedules

  18. Year 3 – Course I (Spring 2009) • Course I taught by Mike Plantholt • One Week (paid) Summer session using REU Site model. • Eliminated need for 2nd course. • Up to four research articles in progress.

  19. Related Project –– REU Site:Mathematics Research Experience for Pre-service and In-service Teachers • 8 pre-service (talented students chosen from across the country) • 4 in-service teachers (Central Illinois) • Eight-week duration (starting 1st full week in June). Six hours a day, five days a week • Topics similar to those in research course • Bi-weekly seminars with focus on mathematics education issues • Last two years: Work with 3rd-5th graders— Generalization & Representation.

  20. REU Program Outcomes • Worked well as a community of teacher-scholars • Research progress in both mathematics and mathematics education • Development of teaching modules / lessons • Follow-up reunions (or REUnions!) • Several research articles & presentations

  21. Research on Impact of Teacher-Scholar Program & REU Programs How does the Teacher-Scholar Program & REU enhance secondary education majors’ potential as future teachers?

  22. More specifically, how does participation affect students … • understanding of mathematics? • beliefs about the nature of mathematics and the teaching & learning of mathematics? • confidence and excitement to do mathematics? • understanding of pedagogical content knowledge?

  23. Data Sources • Assessment of content knowledge • Beliefs surveys • Interviews • Reflective writings

  24. Belief Surveys 1 - strongly agree with the statement. 2 - mostly agree with the statement. 3 – undecided or neutral about the statement. 4 - disagree with the statement. 5 - strongly disagree with the statement.

  25. Beliefs about Mathematics Q10: I can invent my own mathematics to describe patterns that I see. Q18: Mathematics involves a great deal of creativity.

  26. Beliefs about Learning & Teaching Q2: The teacher should provide verification for mathematical arguments given in class rather than expecting students to do so. Q42: Teachers should teach mathematics as an integrated whole so that students will become aware of the connections among various mathematical ideas.

  27. Discovery ACE Problem Solving Teaching 1 Reasoning & Proof Connections Communication Perseverance 1 2 Personal

  28. Student Reflection “This program has taught me about what it is that mathematicians actually do. I’ve learned that they do not simply solve equation after equation, but that it has much more to do with finding patterns, asking questions, and persevering. If I had never had this opportunity, I would never have known for myself what mathematicians do and what it is like to truly discover mathematics, let alone show that to my students. This program has enabled me to pass this knowledge and passion to my students. I KNOW this program will make me a better teacher than I would have been otherwise.” - Leia, pre-service teacher

  29. Next Steps • Impact on pedagogical content knowledge • What is the influence of the Teacher-Scholar and REU Programs on teacher practice? • Testing other innovative programs

  30. Would this Model Work Elsewhere? • What is needed: • Relatively large cohort of pre-service teachers • Mathematicians with experience with undergraduate research. • Mathematicians & Mathematics Educators that get along well. • Faculty & Administrators that value this kind of work. • Alternatives: • A capstone course (or courses) co-taught by Mathematicians & Math Educators. • A mandatory Research Seminar followed by an Undergraduate Research course.

  31. For More Information . . . Teacher-Scholar Program: http://www.math.ilstu.edu/Teacher_Scholar_Program/index.html REU Site: http://www.math.ilstu.edu/reu/

  32. THANK YOU! It’s a pleasure to be with you!

More Related