1 / 18

Fermilab, Proton Driver, Muon Beams, Recycler

Fermilab, Proton Driver, Muon Beams, Recycler. David Neuffer Fermilab NufACT05. Proton Driver and Muon beams. 8GeV Linac can produce streams of 1.5 ×10 14 8GeV protons at 10Hz > 10 22 protons/year Only 1/15 of these needed for Main Injector

Download Presentation

Fermilab, Proton Driver, Muon Beams, Recycler

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fermilab, Proton Driver, Muon Beams, Recycler David Neuffer Fermilab NufACT05

  2. Proton Driver and Muon beams • 8GeV Linac can produce streams of 1.5×1014 8GeV protons at 10Hz • > 1022 protons/year • Only 1/15 of these needed for Main Injector • Are there muon beam experiments that could use this intensity ?? • Tertiary muon beams: • P + X → π • π → μ + ν • 10-2 μ/p → 1020 μ/year or more

  3. Proton Linac (H-)

  4. LFV: m-A  e-A can use high intensity Desirable Beam Characteristics But bunched beam is needed

  5. m-A  e-A experiments • Next generation of m-A  e-A experiments has been proposed • MECO – based at BNL • PRISM-PRIME – based at KEK/JHF • Neither experiment is fully funded • Could either (or both) be hosted at FNAL proton driver ? m-A  e-A produces monoenergetic e- (~105MeV)

  6. 10 -11 10 -13 10 -15 10 -17 10 -19 10 -21 Past and future LFV limits SUSY predictions ofm-A  e-A 10 –5 MECO single event sensitivity PRIME single event sensitivity 10 -11 10 -13 100 300 100 300 GeV From Barbieri, Hall, Hisano …

  7. MECO layout Superconducting Detector Solenoid (2.0 T – 1.0 T) Tracker Muon Stopping Target Superconducting Transport Solenoid (2.5 T – 2.1 T) Muon Beam Stop Crystal Calorimeter Superconducting Production Solenoid (5.0 T – 2.5 T) Collimators Time structure

  8. PRISM-PRIME (Y. Kuno et al.) • High intensity pulsed proton beam (bunch length <10ns) • 100-1000Hz bunches • Pion capture solenoid & decay • Phase rotation with rf field • Δp/p : ±30%  3% • Similar to the front end of the neutrino factory

  9. Proton Beam requirements • MECO experiment • Requires pulses of ~8 GeV protons (<30ns long) every ~1μs (1.4μs) • Obtained by slow extraction of short bunches (in AGS) • Design requires 41013 p/s, 1.5  10-3 captured μ’s/proton • ~61017μ/year from ~4 1020 p/year • PRISM-PRIME experiment • Requires proton pulses (<10ns long) at 103/s (~1ms) • 4 1014 p/s (50GeV) 10-2 to 10-3μ’s/proton • Up to 1022 p/year, > 1019 μ/year • Single-turn extraction of short bunches (<10ns) • Both require pulsed beams, proton linac beam must be repackaged in an accumulator ring

  10. Recycler as accumulator ring ? • 8GeV Linac produces 1ms pulses at 10 Hz • H- injection into Recycler • 1ms fills circumference • (100 turns) • Bunch beam into pattern required for expt. • Harmonic 10 buncher for MECO, slow extraction • Harmonic 100 buncher for PRIME, single bunch extraction But: Recycler circumference is large 100ms may be too short a time for bunching

  11. Space Charge Difficulty • Space Charge tune shift: • Parameters: Ntot=1.51014,εN =20π mm-mrad • MECO: 30ns/1μs : BF= 0.03 →δν = 4 : too large • Reduce N to 1.51013 →δν = 0.4 • Reduce N to 0.41013 →δν = 0.1 • PRISM/PRIME 10ns bunches, 100/ring • BF= 0.1 →δν =1.2: too large (but closer) • Larger εN, smaller Ntot, • Smaller circumference ring would be better

  12. Recycler – Bunching (~for PRISM) • Harmonic 100 buncher (9MHz) • Bunch for 0.1s • (Vrf ramps to 140kV) • Bunch lengths reduced to ~5ns rms (Prism wants < 10ns full width.) • Could then extract bunches one at a time over ~0.1s • Uses 1/2 the possible linac pulses (500 bunches/s for PRISM) (100 at 5Hz)

  13. Recycler – Bunching for ~MECO • Harmonic 10 buncher (0.9MHz) • Barrierbucket rf • Bunch for ~1s • (Vrf ramps to ~30kV) • Bunch lengths reduced to ~50ns rms (MECO wants ~30ns full width.) • Could then extract bunches in slow extraction over ~1s

  14. Other potential proton storage schemes • Accumulator or Debuncher (C= ~454m) after 2010… • Large aperture machines • Difficult to inject H- (must bend beam from Linac) (B < 0.05T, ρ > ~600m) • Could take debunched protons from Recycler or Main Injector(in ~450m chunks) • Or Old linac + Booster • Bunch into pattern needed for experiments • Bunching easier than Recycler • Better match for MECO

  15. Generic High intensity muon beam • Detailed m source design does not exist • Straw man design worked out for the front end of a n factory • supported by MARS simulations (Ray et al.) • Target + capture solenoid + drift (forward capture) • 1.4 x 1022 protons/year at 8 GeV yields ~3 x 1021 muons/year. Charged particle spectra at end of decay channel

  16. References • W. Foster et al., Proton Driver http://tdserver1.fnal.gov/project/8GeVLinac/DesignStudy/ • W. Molson, “The MECO Experiment to Search for -Ne-N with 10-17 Sensitivity”, U. Va. Seminar, June 2004 • MECO • ‘RSVP’ Rare Symmetry Violating Processes (MECO-KOPIO) NSF proposal, October 1999. • PRISM Working group • “An Experimental Search for the μ−−e− Conversion Process at an Ultimate Sensitivity of the Order of 10−18with PRISM”, The Prime Working Group, Jan. 1, 2003. • R. Ray & D. Roberts, Proton Driver physics study

  17. Summary • Muon Beams from the Proton Driver could be very useful • Potential muon beam facilities could be developed: • MECO, PRISM … could be hosted • More Detailed design needed • Proton Collection • Recycler, Accumulator, Debuncher, … • New Stretcher/Buncher ring ?? • Beam line(s) • Experimental area(s)

  18. Proton Driver Parameters 8 GeV LINAC Energy GeV 8 Particle Type H- Ions, Protons, or Electrons Rep. Rate Hz 10 Active Length m 671 Beam Current mA 25 Pulse Length msec 1 Beam Intensity P / pulse 1.5E+14 (can also be H-, P, or e-) P/s 1.5E+15 Linac Beam Power MW avg. 2 MW peak 200 MAIN INJECTOR WITH 8 GeV LINAC MI Beam Energy GeV 120 MI Beam Power MW 2.0 MI Cycle Time sec 1.5 filling time = 1msec MI Protons/cycle 1.5E+14 5x design MI Protons/hr P / hr 3.6E+17 H-minus Injection turns 90 MI Beam Current mA 2250

More Related