80 likes | 191 Views
EXPERIENCE WITH A PMMA KERATOPROSTHESIS AT THE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SAO PAULO, BRASIL. Oliveira LA, M.D; Sousa LB, M.D; Hofling-Lima AL, M.D; Freitas D, M.D; Belfort R Jr, M.D. Authors have no financial interest. PURPOSE.
E N D
EXPERIENCE WITH A PMMA KERATOPROSTHESIS AT THE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SAO PAULO, BRASIL Oliveira LA, M.D; Sousa LB, M.D; Hofling-Lima AL, M.D; Freitas D, M.D; Belfort R Jr, M.D. Authors have no financial interest.
PURPOSE • To report the Federal University of São Paulo experience with a PMMA keratoprosthesis(Boston Type I)
METHODS • Study design: chart review of 16 eyes of 16 patients who underwent Boston type I K-pro surgery between 2008 and 2010 • Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were analyzed, including visual acuity and keratoprosthesis stability • All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon: LAO
RESULTS • Preoperative diagnosis - Chemical injury: 8 eyes (50%) - Failed graft: 8 eyes (50%) • Preoperative glaucoma - 9 eyes (56.25%) • Preoperative BCVA - ranged from 20/400 – light perception
RESULTS • Average follow-up - 17 months (1-25m) • Postoperative visual acuity - ≥ 20/200: 75% - ≥ 20/200: 70% (at least 1 year postop) - ≥ 20/40: 30% (at least 1 year postop) • Retention rate - 93.75% (mean follow-up 17 months)
MAIN COMPLICATIONS • Retroprosthetic membrane - 4 eyes (25%) • IOP increase - 4 eyes (25%) • Retinal detachment - 1 eye (6.25%) • Infection (keratitis) - 1 eye (6.25%) • Extrusion - 1 eye (6.25%)
CONCLUSIONS • This PMMA keratoprosthesis is a viable option in conditions with a poor prognosis for primary keratoplasty as in chemical injury and multiple keratoplasty failures • The UNIFESP experience seems equivalent to previous reports regarding the complications rates as well as the anatomic and functional outcomes. Zerbe BL. Ophthalmology 2006. Bradley J. Cornea 2009.