80 likes | 482 Views
Experience with Dohlman-Doane keratoprosthesis : case reports. Sergio Kwitko, Andressa P. Stolz, Melissa Dal Pizzol, Diane Marinho, Samuel Rymer Ophthalmology Department - Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre - Brazil
E N D
ExperiencewithDohlman-Doanekeratoprosthesis: case reports Sergio Kwitko, Andressa P. Stolz, Melissa Dal Pizzol, Diane Marinho, Samuel Rymer Ophthalmology Department - Hospital de Clínicas de Porto AlegreFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre - Brazil The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster
Purpose • To describe 14 eyes of 13 patients who had received Dohlman-Doane type 1 Keratoprostesis (Kpro) with a mean follow-up of 25.5 months (range, 1 to 49 months).
Methods • A retrospective, noncomparative interventional case series. • Previous corneal disease was: • bilateral alkaline burn (5 eyes) • multiple graft failure (6 eyes) • Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (2 eyes) • thermal injury (1 eye) • Best corrected spectacle visual acuity (BSCVA) was hand motions or worse in all eyes. • Glaucoma was present in 3 eyes preoperatively and received Ahmed valve implantation. • Post operative care is the same of conventional penetrating keratoplasty, added with continuous therapeutic contact lens, medroxiprogesterone and antibiotic drops.
Results • 64% of eyes achieved BSCVA of ≥ 20/100 and 42.8% ≥ 20/40 (see table 1). In these eyes, post operative visual field was stable, in 30-50º. • Complications: • 6 eyes: posterior capsule opacification treated with YAG laser capsulotomy; • 5 eyes: corneal necrosis (4 treated with donor cornea bottom exchange); • 3 eyes: retroprosthetic membrane treated with tPA injection; • 2 eyes: vitreitis treated with posterior vitrectomy; • 1 eye: fungal keratitis (ended with post traumatic inoperable retinal detachment); • 1 eye: fusarium endophthalmitis, treated with corneal transplant, anterior vitrectomy, Kpro and intraocular lens explantation, as well as specific intravitreal and endovenous treatment. • 1 eye: eviscerated after irreversible phthisis bulbi occurrence.
Conclusion • Dohlman Kpro seems to be a good option for cases in witch penetrating keratoplasty contraindications. • Advantages: • does not need systemic immunossupression • good visual outcome. • Best results were achieved in non-immune diseases.
References • Ma JJ, Graney JM, Dohlman CH. Repeat penetrating keratoplasty versus the Boston keratoprosthesis in graft failure. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2005;45:49. • Aquavella JV, Qian Y, McCormick GJ, Palakuru JR. Keratoprosthesis: the Dohlman-Doane device. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140:1032. • Doane MG, Dohlman CH, Bearse G. Fabrication of a keratoprosthesis. Cornea 1996;15:179. • Zerbe BL, Belin MW, Ciolino JB. Results from the multicenter Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1779. • Bradley JC, Hernandez EG, Schwab IR, Mannis MJ. Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: the university of california davis experience. Cornea 2009;28:321. • Sayegh RR, Ang LP, Foster CS, Dohlman CH. The Boston keratoprosthesis in Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 145:438. • Barnes SD, Dohlman CH, Durand ML. Fungal colonization and infection in Boston keratoprosthesis. Cornea 2007;26:9. • Aldave AJ, Kamal KM, Vo RC, Yu F. The Boston type I keratoprosthesis: improving outcomes and expanding indications. Ophthalmology 2009; 116:640.