1 / 16

EVS Essay Practice

EVS Essay Practice. Essay question 1. Evaluate the anthropocentric view that it is important for everyone in society to 
participate in environmental decision-making. Discuss one example of the successful involvement of communities in solving environmental problems. [8 ] (Paper 2, May 2011).

levana
Download Presentation

EVS Essay Practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EVS Essay Practice

  2. Essay question 1 • Evaluate the anthropocentric view that it is important for everyone in society to 
participate in environmental decision-making. Discuss one example of the successful involvement of communities in solving environmental problems. [8] • (Paper 2, May 2011)

  3. Evaluate: • Assess the implications and limitations • Strengths and weaknesses

  4. Strengths… • Participation has an important role to help educate people about environmental issues; • Participation means that people who may be causing the problems are less likely to do so if they are involved in decisions about their own environments; sometimes poorer/less powerful/marginal groups in society have the best knowledge about what is right for an environment e.g. indigenous groups, and if they participate their knowledge can be shared; • People who believe in democracy argue that everyone has a right to have a say in how communal resources/environments are managed; • Ecosystems need to be managed holistically so people from all walks of life who have useful skills can contribute;

  5. Weaknesses • Sometimes leadership needs to be taken by political groups to ensure change happens; • Too many people being consulted can slow down progress when the need for action is urgent; • Many groups in society may not care about the environment or see it as important;

  6. Example: Tree planting in Nepal • Villagers provided with seedlings / individual responsibility for protecting forests given to local community groups; • Forests provide fuel wood resources for villagers;
soil also conserved as forests protect from erosion; • Communities benefit directly from standing forest reserve and are therefore more likely to participate in protecting trees as they grow;

  7. International Agreements are not accepted • Kyoto/Montreal protocols” as a valid example of involvement of communities unless the discussion explains how communities are involved at a local level. • The responses must be an example of the involvement of LOCAL people in a “community project.”

  8. Essay question 2 • Describe and evaluate ecocentric and technocentric responses to eutrophication. [8]

  9. Describe and Evaluate • Give a detailed account • Assess the implications and limitations

  10. Ecocentric responses • Minimize the impact on the environment by encouraging people to be restrained; • Use methods which are more in harmony with natural systems; • e.g. use of organic fertilizers/manure on agricultural fields; • e.g. practice of mixed cropping/crop rotation so less or no fertilizers are needed; • e.g.educationalcampaigns to encourage people to use less detergent/more environmentally friendly detergent; • e.g. plant a buffer zone between the fields and the water courses to absorb any run-off;

  11. Technocentric responses Emphasize the use of technology/human ingenuity in managing environment/resource issues;
e.g. developing an alternative to phosphates in detergents;
e.g. applying fertilizers more carefully so there is reduced run-off/wastage;
e.g. using technology to screen water to remove pollutants;
e.g. pumping air through lakes to avoid the low oxygen conditions;
e.g. dredging sediments;

  12. Evaluation of ecocentric responses • people are reluctant to adapt lifestyles/accept lowered standard of living so ecocentric approaches can be hard to enforce; • alternative approaches e.g. organic fertilizers/manure may not work so effectively or can still cause run-off and eutrophication;

  13. Evaluation Technocentric responses • technocentric solutions may increase the costs of e.g. detergents/may require a financial commitment; • technocentric can be a short term solution but is unsustainable; • technocentric solutions may not be an option in less-developed areas/for less wealthy farmers; • some solutions are time consuming/do not get at the root cause e.g. pumping air; • can be hard to identify who is the cause of the pollution so hard to target educational campaigns effectively; • alternative products may still cause other environmental problems;

  14. Notes.. • Give credit for candidates who recognize that the same response may be classified as technocentric or ecocentric. • Award [8 max] if both viewpoints are mentioned and each point made is evaluated.

  15. Essay question 3 • Discuss, with reference to two contrasting environmental problems, the technocentric belief that technology may provide solutions to environmental problems. [8] (Paper 2, May 2011)

  16. Discuss: • Give an account including a range of arguments for and against the relative importance of various factors or comparisons of alternative hypothesis • Note: “Reference” means you have to talk about real examples and refer to them.

More Related