1 / 8

Navy Packaging Board Working Group Three Report July 15, 2010

Navy Packaging Board Working Group Three Report July 15, 2010. Prepared by: Ginger Garbarini, Fred Hawkins, Tom Lippert, Tom McGrath, & Jennifer Thran. Our Task & Our Resources. Task: Evaluate Navy Packaging Board progress to date and recommend options for moving forward Resources:

lewis-mcfarland
Download Presentation

Navy Packaging Board Working Group Three Report July 15, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Navy Packaging Board Working Group Three ReportJuly 15, 2010 Prepared by: Ginger Garbarini, Fred Hawkins, Tom Lippert, Tom McGrath, & Jennifer Thran

  2. Our Task & Our Resources • Task: • Evaluate Navy Packaging Board progress to date and recommend options for moving forward • Resources: • OPNAVINST 4030.1A dated 07 Feb 06 • Charter of the Navy Packaging Board • Group discussion

  3. Challenge of Improved Communication • Problem Statement: • One of the NPB’s biggest ongoing challenges is communicating the importance of packaging, handling, storage, and transportability issues; and their impact on all aspects of total ownership costs to Navy and Marine Corps decision makers, resource sponsors, and other stakeholders. • Often the NPB reacts to PHS&T “problems” created by stakeholders who did not involve the NPB in solutions that were implemented with a direct impact on NPB chartered areas of interest.

  4. Challenge of Improved Communication • Recommended Solutions • Formalize communication with Resource Sponsor (N41) • Newsletter (wide e-mail distribution to stakeholders) • Good example: “NLI-Newsgram” • Website • Social Networking • Through improved visibility; strive to obtain “top cover” and increased advocacy for NPB initiatives from OPNAV N41

  5. Challenge of Demonstrating Positive ROI • Problem Statement: • Decision makers and resource sponsors require evidence of a positive return on investment to motivate action on: • Policy document revisions • Advocacy of NPB initiatives • Routine ongoing funding through POM process • Resources for NPB recommended solutions

  6. Challenge of Demonstrating Positive ROI • Recommended Solutions: • Take a Systems Integration Approach • Ensure that the vertical documentation/authority for NPB actions/recommendations is communicated • Ensure that the horizontal impacts on total ownership costs of PHS&T policy changes/initiatives are understood, communicated, and wherever possible quantified • Process mapping • Metrics development • Data collection/reporting

  7. Challenge of Implementing and Exercising Technical Warrant Authority • Problem Statement: • NAVICP Code 077 is the Technical Warrant Authority Holder for all Naval non-ordnance packaging issues • Stakeholder awareness of Code 077 Tech Warrant • Training requirements • Qualification/approval for delegation of authority • Two-way communication with stakeholders • “Institutionalize” the Code 077 role

  8. Challenge of Implementing and Exercising Technical Warrant Authority • Recommended Solutions: • Code 077 should use the NPB membership as a resource to: • Communicate the Technical Warrant Authority to Naval Stakeholder organizations • Assist in the development/communication of training requirements • Have visibility of qualification/approval of delegated authority in their stakeholder organizations • Facilitate two-way communication with Code 077 on issues requiring review and action by the Naval Technical Warrant Authority holder • Consider more effective title or name for the PHS&T Tech Authority to better communicate the PHS&T role

More Related