110 likes | 234 Views
What Ontario Has Learned from 40 Years of Bilateral Transfer Agreements. Cindy Dundon Hazell Senior Vice President, Seneca January 26, 2012. Introduction: Setting the historical context Ontario’s Credit Transfer Strategy Best Practices in Developing Articulation Agreements
E N D
What Ontario Has Learned from 40 Years of Bilateral Transfer Agreements Cindy Dundon Hazell Senior Vice President, Seneca January 26, 2012
Introduction: Setting the historical context • Ontario’s Credit Transfer Strategy • Best Practices in Developing Articulation Agreements • Signs of Progress • What Have We Learned? • Looking forward…. Presentation Overview
1965: Legislation enacted to create the CAATs 1990: Vision 2000 1993: Task Force on Advanced Training (Pitman Report) 1996: College-University Consortium Council (CUCC) 1999: CAATs, Universities and Degrees: Towards Some Options for Enhancing the Connection between CAATs and Degrees (Skolnik) Setting Historical Context
Setting Historical Context 1999: Ontario College-University Degree Completion Accord (The Port Hope Accord) 2002: Postsecondary Education Choice and Excellence Act 2005: Ontario, A Leader in Learning (The Rae Review) 2006: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario (HEQCO) 2009: Steering Committee on Credit Transfer 2011: Honourable John Milloy announces plan to create a province wide credit transfer system
Policy Statement (Vision, Goals, Direction) • $$$ to support Innovation and Capacity • ONCAT • Accountability Framework Ontario’s Strategy
Over 4,000 C- U transfers every year • Over 500 individual credit transfer arrangements • Shifting trend from bi-laterals to multilaterals • More current and complete information in OTG • New portal: more accessible, informative, functional • Increased response to CUCC calls for project/research funding • More agreements built from provincial program standards • Greater dialogue across sectors; greater understanding • It’s everybody’s business! Signs of Progress
There’s still work to be done! • Persistent perceptions of inconsistency, inequity, one-offs (“The Fine Print”) • Range in practice from formal agreements and transfer policies, to informal practices and individual assessments • Increased transfer credit ≠ decreased time to completion • Pathways are no longer linear • Not all transfer students are graduates; not all transfers are high affinity….and not all transfers are planned! But….What have we learned?
What have we learned? • One size does NOT fit all • Credit transfer is about Access andQuality • Also about increasing options for students and reducing duplication (time and $) • The problem is often the “language” we speak – and the assumptions we make. • Inter-institutional collaboration requires mutual respect, trust and a shared focus on students
Increased clarity and transparency (and certainty) for students as they plan their PSE journey • Increased support and advisement available to students as they transition • One size does NOT fit all • The strategy must be multi-dimensional and dynamic Looking forward…
Bi-laterals are the perfect solution in some circumstances; in others, we need “more”… • Multilateral pathways and agreements, built from provincial program standards, in high affinity areas • Program learning outcomes as basis of transfer credit for college graduates • System-wide pathways for graduates of high enrolment programs, built to multiple receiving institutions • Innovative, specially-designed degree completion programs • An inventory of core general education/electives offered by multiple colleges - and applicable at multiple universities • And more ……TBC (to be created)! Looking forward….