120 likes | 132 Views
Stay informed with the latest updates on ESEA reauthorization and federal education policies. Learn about the differences in the House and Senate bills, points of concern, regulatory relief, and the FY13 budget proposal. Access AASA advocacy resources for a comprehensive overview.
E N D
March Madness: federal education update AASA March 2012
Overview • ESEA • House • Senate • Waivers • Funding • FY13 • Sequestration
ESEA Reauthorization: Overview • House Cmte passed ESEA bills out of committee in late February • Very partisan • Can expect it to move to the floor, but not much further • Senate passed their bipartisan bill out of committee in October • Do not expect it to the floor any time soon
ESEA Reauthorization: The Good • Both snap AYP, AMO, 100% proficiency • Both require annual testing in math/reading in grades 3-8 and once in high school • Continued data disaggregation • States get big say in intervening in low-performing schools • Eliminates requirement re: tutoring and school choice • Both reauthorize REAP
ESEA Reauthorization: Points of Concern • House • Maintenance of Effort • Funding Cap • Equitable Participation • Charters • Senate • Comparability Changes • Reliance on One-Time testing • Treatment of Foster Kids • Codification of RttT and i3
ESEA: House & Senate Differences • Both call for higher standards; House makes it illegal for Secretary to endorse specific efforts (Common Core) • House model lacks any specific turn around models, as well as any parameters in identifying who would use models • House doesn’t include another percentage of schools for special attention (Senate includes gap schools, administration includes those at-risk of 5%) • House bill eliminates HQT requirement • House bill requires SEA/LEAs to develop teacher evaluation systems (Driven by student performance and having more than 2 levels); Senate only requires it for those applying for competitive grants • House bill includes significant expansion of funding flexibility
ESEA: Regulatory Relief • Flexibility being offered in 11 specific areas • States have to adopt all three policy priorities: • Higher standards • Differentiated accountability system • Teacher/principal evaluation system based on growth • Conditional, quid-pro-quo deal, with states having to adopt specific policy priorities in exchange for relief
ESEA: Regulatory Relief • To date, 39+ states have expressed interest in the waivers • 11 states applied for and received waivers in the first round: CO, FL, GA, IN, KY, MA, MN, NJ, NM, OK, and TN • 26 more states applied in the second round • Who hasn’t applied? AL, AK, CA, HI, ME, MT, NV, NH, ND, PA, TX, WV, and WY • One more round, applications due Sept. 6
FY13 Budget Proposal • USED only non-defense funding increase -about $1.7 billion • $30 billion to retain, hire teachers and first responders • $30 billion to modernize at least 35,000 schools
FY13 Budget Proposal • Level funds Title I and IDEA • Consolidates 38 programs down to 11 • $850 million for RTT • $150 million for i3 • $2.5 billion for teacher quality formula grants • $400 million for Teachers/Leaders Innovation Fund • NEW $5 billion grant program to reform the teaching profession • Eliminates funding for Impact Aid Federal Property Program
AASA Advocacy Resources • AASA Website: www.aasa.org • AASA Blog: www.aasa.org/aasablog.aspx • AASA Twitter: @Noellerson • Weekly Leg Corps: Concise weekly wrap up of what happened in Congress (email Sasha) • Monthly Update: Summary of everything going on in Congress (email Noelle) • Policy Insider: A periodic publication that takes a more in-depth look at current education policy issues (email Noelle)
Questions? • Noelle Ellerson (nellerson@aasa.org)Assistant Director, Policy Analysis & Advocacy • Sasha Pudelski (spudelski@aasa.org) Government Affairs Manager