E N D
2. At the end of 2006, 5,678 adolescents 13 to 19 years of age were living with HIV/AIDS in 33 states with confidential name-based HIV infection reporting.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.At the end of 2006, 5,678 adolescents 13 to 19 years of age were living with HIV/AIDS in 33 states with confidential name-based HIV infection reporting.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
3. In 2006, there were 1,373 adolescents aged 13 to 19 years diagnosed with HIV/AIDS from 33 states with confidential name-based HIV infection reporting.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.In 2006, there were 1,373 adolescents aged 13 to 19 years diagnosed with HIV/AIDS from 33 states with confidential name-based HIV infection reporting.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
4. At the end of 2006, 3,116 adolescents 13 to 19 years of age were reported to be living with AIDS in the United States and dependent areas. At the end of 2006, 3,116 adolescents 13 to 19 years of age were reported to be living with AIDS in the United States and dependent areas.
5. In 2006, 581 adolescents 13 to 19 years of age were reported with AIDS in the United States and dependent areas. In 2006, 581 adolescents 13 to 19 years of age were reported with AIDS in the United States and dependent areas.
6. From 1985 through 2006, 6,642 adolescents (persons aged 13-19 years) were reported with AIDS. In earlier years, most reported cases were in adolescent males; over time, the male-to-female ratio has decreased. In 2006, 581 adolescents were reported with AIDS; of these, 354 (61%) were male and 227 (39%) were female.From 1985 through 2006, 6,642 adolescents (persons aged 13-19 years) were reported with AIDS. In earlier years, most reported cases were in adolescent males; over time, the male-to-female ratio has decreased. In 2006, 581 adolescents were reported with AIDS; of these, 354 (61%) were male and 227 (39%) were female.
7. From 1985 through 2006, a total of 36,293 young adults aged 20 to 24 years were reported with AIDS; most were male. In 1985, 89% of cases reported in young adults 20 to 24 years old were in males. However, as high-risk heterosexual contact has accounted for an increasing proportion of HIV infections, particularly in females, the proportion of AIDS cases reported in females has increased. In 2006, 30% of the 1,755 cases reported were in females.From 1985 through 2006, a total of 36,293 young adults aged 20 to 24 years were reported with AIDS; most were male. In 1985, 89% of cases reported in young adults 20 to 24 years old were in males. However, as high-risk heterosexual contact has accounted for an increasing proportion of HIV infections, particularly in females, the proportion of AIDS cases reported in females has increased. In 2006, 30% of the 1,755 cases reported were in females.
8. From 2003 through 2006, the majority of HIV/AIDS cases among adolescent and young adult males were attributed to male-to-male sexual contact.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.From 2003 through 2006, the majority of HIV/AIDS cases among adolescent and young adult males were attributed to male-to-male sexual contact.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
9. From 2002 through 2006, 1,231 adolescent males age 13 to 19 years and 5,552 young adult males age 20 to 24 years were diagnosed with AIDS.
The majority of males age 13 to 19 (60%) and 20 to 24 (72%) with AIDS had a risk factor of male-to-male sexual contact.
Twelve percent of AIDS cases among males age 13 to 19 and 13% of cases among males age 20-24 years were attributed to high-risk heterosexual contact.From 2002 through 2006, 1,231 adolescent males age 13 to 19 years and 5,552 young adult males age 20 to 24 years were diagnosed with AIDS.
The majority of males age 13 to 19 (60%) and 20 to 24 (72%) with AIDS had a risk factor of male-to-male sexual contact.
Twelve percent of AIDS cases among males age 13 to 19 and 13% of cases among males age 20-24 years were attributed to high-risk heterosexual contact.
10. From 2003 through 2006, the majority of AIDS cases diagnosed among adolescent and young adult females were attributed to high-risk heterosexual contact.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.From 2003 through 2006, the majority of AIDS cases diagnosed among adolescent and young adult females were attributed to high-risk heterosexual contact.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
11. From 2002 through 2006, the majority of AIDS cases among adolescent and young adult females were attributed to high-risk heterosexual contact. From 2002 through 2006, the majority of AIDS cases among adolescent and young adult females were attributed to high-risk heterosexual contact.
12.
Burgess ClinicChildren’s National Medical CenterWashington, D.C.
13. Burgess Clinic
Comprehensive primary and specialty care service for HIV infected adolescents
Full range of medical, psychosocial, and preventive care
Embedded in Adolescent Health Center, offering full range of educational and support services of Center available to Burgess patients and families
Site of Adolescent Trial Network (ATN) Grant
14. Burgess Clinic HIV Infected Youth in Care
160 patients with HIV infection
76 (47%) female; 84 (53%) male
91 (57%) perinatally infected
64 (40%) behaviorally infected
3 (2%) sexual assault victims and 2 (1%) “unknown”
Perinatally infected teens largest source of new patients
70 (44%) now defined as having AIDS
15. Burgess Clinic Scope of Services for HIV Infected Patients and Families
Medical Care
Mental Health Services
Substance Abuse Counseling
Social Support Services
Case Management
Respite Care
Health Education Projects
Community Advocacy and Research
16. Unique Psychosocial Situation of Behaviorally Infected Teens: “Marginalized” youth; they have run away or have been “thrown away” by their families, and many have been abused. (Chabon & Futterman, 1999; Lyon, Richmond, D’Angelo, 1996; Lyon, Silber, D’Angelo, 1997)
More likely to be school drop-outs and more likely to have a high rate of psychiatric co-morbidity (Murphy et al., 2001; Murphy, Moscicki, Vermund, & Muenz, 2000; Pao, Lyon, et al, 2000; Rotheram-Bones, Murphy et al, 2001).
17. Unique Psychosocial Situation of Perinatally Infected Teens: Death of a parent
Transition to one or more homes
Missed a great deal of school due to their illness
18. What Are Adolescents’ Risk Factors for HIV Infection? Traditional risk factors
“Multiple” sexual partners
Non-injection drug use
Co-existent sexually transmitted disease
Resident in community with high incidence of HIV
19. HIV Risk Profile Studies in Adolescents Infection Rates:
Higher in men who have sex with other men
Higher in either gender if they are infected with syphilis
Higher in men who have receptive anal intercourse
Higher in women who have older sexual partners
Higher in women who have partners that use drugs
20. What Does this Mean for Adolescents in terms of HIV Risk? “Geography is Destiny”
While prevalence rates in the general population may be low, certain groups are at “extremely” high risk
Prevention efforts need to focus and refocus on these groups
General education can’t be considered “finished”
21. Therapeutic Challenges in Treating the HIV Infected Adolescent Determining the right time to initiate therapy
Optimizing Adherence to treatment regimens
Dealing with the increasing amount of medication resistance
Ensuring appropriate transition to other care systems
22. Challenges of HIV-Infected Teens Demands of complex drug regimens and side effects
Disclosure of HIV status (and its accompanying societal, family, and/or peer stigma)
Management of a chronic and sexually transmitted illness within the context of the already demanding developmental tasks and changes associated with adolescence.
23. Differences Between Behaviorally-Related and Perinatally HIV Infected Youth CD4 counts are lower (perinatal)
Viral loads are higher (perinatal)
Resistance more likely (perinatal)
Adherence more problematic (behavioral)
Associated risk behaviors more likely (behavioral, BUT……)
Social disruption more prominent (equal)
24. Developmentally appropriate, adolescent-specific strategies Younger and middle adolescents
approach problem solving very concretely
cue on the physical attributes of problems
are preoccupied by pubertal change
are sensitive to body image and developing sexuality
are highly egocentric
have a strong need for peer acceptance
Middle and older adolescents
strive to establish a sense of autonomy
have feelings of invincibility
25. HIV Prevention-Intervention Studies in Adolescents Studies show success is greatest when:
Your Target is African-American Youth
Your Target is Older Adolescents
You have male facilitators to deal with male patients
All assessments are anonymous
Condoms are distributed
Study groups are smaller
26.
Adolescents and Adherence:
What are the key factors and what makes them different?
27. Adherence to medications is critical: To maintain the health of the teens
To decrease the risk of transmission during unprotected sex
Approximately 1/3 of recently HIV-infected teens continue to engage in a high rate of risky behavior following diagnosis
Must learn to assume responsibility for their own medication regimens, a task that has proven to be difficult even for adult patients.
28. What does the literature provide on adherence ° Sparse studies
° Most are descriptive very few examine interventions
° Consistency regarding adherence as crucially important
° Adherence as development issue
° Multi-complex issue
° Needs to be addressed from numerous perspectives
° Further research need to be conducted
29. Correlates of Adherence Three Broad Categories:
Issues Related to medication
Indefinite duration of treatment
Multiple medications
High pill burden
Complex dietary considerations
Multiple and precise dosing times
Storage requirements
Low palatability
Large pills
Adverse effects
30. Correlates continued Issues Related to Patient
Age
Awareness of status
Belief about impact of medications on quality of life
Substance use
Depression
Stress
Amount of responsibility for medication taking
Improved health status
31. Correlates continued Issues Related to Caregiver/Family
Foster vs biological parent
Higher self efficacy
Belief in efficacy of medications
Less concern about hiding child illness
Better parent-child communication
Less caregiver stress
Higher quality of life
Better caregiver cognitive functioning
Better caregiver knowledge of medications
Fewer barriers
32. Intervention Group meetings
Individual meetings
33. Public Policy Approach toHIV Infection in Adolescents 1. Create standing task force to combat HIV infection in adolescents
2. Continue primary as well as secondary and tertiary prevention for adolescents through in depth curricula
3. Develop national standards for HIV counseling and testing in adolescents utilizing new technology; consider positive and negative aspects of such testing
34. Public Policy Approach to HIV Infection in Adolescents 4. Create “adolescent-sensitive” services
surrounding HIV/AIDS
5. Remove financial and social barriers for
adolescents to receive care
6. Co-ordinate research efforts surrounding
HIV/AIDS in adolescents
35. The Future of HIV Infection in Adolescents: What Will be Important? Adolescents will continue to be important in the epidemiology of HIV/AIDS, particularly “high risk” teens
There will be a growing number of teenagers who were infected in early life
Prevention Intervention will target youth “most at risk”
“Vaccine Preparedness” will become goal
“Adolescent specific” trials will increase
Much of this will be coordinated through established research networks
36. Questions? Comments?!?