360 likes | 1.02k Views
Chapter 4. Classical Conditioning Applications. Emotional Conditioning. Wide range of emotional responses Emotions universal Positive and negative Emotional response to stimulus reflexive Conditioned Emotional Responses (CERs). John Broadus Watson. Hard-line Behaviorism
E N D
Chapter 4 Classical Conditioning Applications
Emotional Conditioning • Wide range of emotional responses • Emotions universal • Positive and negative • Emotional response to stimulus reflexive • Conditioned Emotional Responses (CERs)
John Broadus Watson • Hard-line Behaviorism • British Empiricism (nurture over nature) • Early work with rats • Shifted to infant research
Conditioning of Fear • Watson & Raynor (1920) • Albert B. • Mother a wet nurse at Harriet Lane Home (attached to Johns Hopkins University) • Albert first assessed at about 8 months • Emotionally stable, healthy
Method • Present white rat • No fear • Present white rat and bang metal bar • Produces CER of fear, avoidance, withdrawl • US = noise, UR = startle • CS = rat CR = fear • CER generalizes to other furry objects • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMnhyGozLyE
Study went for several months • Intended to reverse CER conditioning, but Albert B’s mother ended her job at hospital • Mary Cover-Jones; counter-conditioning with Peter
What Happened to Albert • Beck, Levinson & Irons (2009) • Historical detective work • Albert B.’s mother probably Arvilla Irons Merritte • Douglas Merritte, born 9 March 1919 • Arvilla Merritte left Johns Hopkins • Worked as assistant for ill wife of farmer • Douglas Merritte died 10 May 1925, probably from meningitis
Name • Why Albert B.? • Ethical concerns with confidentiality not firmly established • Watson may have played “name games” • His sons William and James • His name from John Albert Broadus, Baptist minister… Albert B.
What Happened to Watson • Affair with Rosalie Raynor, his grad student • Divorce, fired, resigned as president of APA • Worked for J. Walter Thompson advertising agency; vice-president within two years • Ponds Cold Cream, Maxwell House coffee • Published books and articles on childcare • Psychological care of infant and child (1928) • Criticized by many modern child experts/advocates, but no more extreme than other childcare texts of the time • Strongly advocated against spanking and corporal punishment
Nonhuman Studies of Fear • Usually shock as US • Rats freeze • Train operant response; train CS+ for aversive US, test suppression of operant response in presence and absence of CS • Suppression video
CS Responding Suppression Ratio = CS Responding + pre-CS Responding Suppression Ratio • 0 if behaviour entirely suppressed • 0.5 if no suppression
Prejudice • Prejudice related to hate • Hate conditionable • Staats & Staats (1958) • Subjects rate nationalities • Paired positive, negative, neutral words with nationalities
Association • Political speeches • Media coverage • Negative images, words, impressions paired with identifiable group
Counter Conditioning • Mary Cover Jones (1924) • Eliminate phobia via classical conditioning • Peter feared rabbits • Peter eats snack (US) … present rabbit (CS) • Associate positive US with CS
Systematic Desensitization • Relaxation techniques • Gradual introduction of phobic stimulus • Imagination up to real situation
Flooding • “Flood” patient with exposure to fear-inducing stimulus
First-Order C.C. in Ads • Product (initially neutral --> CS) • Pair with stimulus that elicits positive emotion (US) • Consumer sees product, has positive CR
Example • Postbank • US = funny situation • UR = happiness • CS = brand • CR = happiness, amusement, positive emotion
Second-Order C.C. • Use previously conditioned celebrity, situation, etc. • CS1 & US • Now, pair brand (CS2) with CS1
Example • Chanel No. 5 • Nicole Kiddman = CS1 • Positive feeling = CR • Attractive, successful, lifestyle = US • Positive feeling = UR • Chanel No. 5 = CS2 • Assumption: buy perfume, be rich, popular, get the cute guy, romance
Example • Japander.com • Brad Pitt and 503 Jeans • Pitt (CS1), leading man, celebrity, rich, pretty = desirable (US), 503s (CS2) • Pierce Brosnan and VISA • Bond persona (CS1), excitement, adventure, sophistication = desirable (US), VISA (CS2)
Paraphilia • “Incorrect love” • Fetishism, masochism, pedophilia, rape, etc. • More common in males • Freud: unconscious forces • Classical conditioning: association formed
Example: Masochism • Generally, CS is previously neutral • But, a US, by pairing with another strong US, can become a CS • Pavlov: shock (CS) for food (US) • Masochism: painful stimulus (CS) for stimulus eliciting sexual pleasure (US)
Counter Conditioning • Pair undesired CS with strongly aversive US (resulting in, e.g., nausea) • Aversion therapy • Treatment difficult with some forms of paraphilia (e.g., pedophilia)
Typically • Long-delay or trace conditioning • US is food poisoning, illness, etc. • UR is nausea induced pain • CS is novel food/flavour • CR is avoidance, nausea • Violation of contiguity?
Explanations? • Sensitization • Aftertaste • Biological preparedness • Taste aversion a special case
Biological Preparedness in Taste-Aversion • Garcia & Koelling (1966) Foot shock X-ray Water intake Water intake Pre-cond. Post-cond. Pre-cond. Post-cond. Flavoured water “Bright-noisy” water
Explanation • Biological predispositions • Must know about CS-US relationship before predicting nature of CR • Certain stimuli more easily associated than others
Allergic Reaction • Release of histamines • Body’s immune response to allergens • Not all allergic responses biological • Can be learned
Examples • Pollen and artificial flowers • My allergy to cats
Russell et al. (1984) • Expose guinea pigs to BSA • Becomes allergen (US for histamine release) • Pair BSA with odour of fish or sulphur (CSs) • Expose guinea pigs to odours and get increased histamines (CR) in bloodstream • Preparatory value of classical conditioning
Schaller et al. (2010) • Subjects see photo sets of guns (G) or people with infectious diseases (ID) • Stress test given : G more stressful than ID • Blood drawn, incubated with bacteria • ID subjects’ white blood cells produced 24% increase in cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) over baseline • G subjects only show 7% increase in IL-6 over baseline • Photos = CS, IL-6 production = CR