E N D
1. Environmental Surveillance Nick Komar, ScD
CDC – DVBID
Fort Collins, CO
3. Environmental Surveillance Modalities Vector density and infection rate
Sentinel captive birds
Sentinel free-ranging birds
Avian mortality surveillance
Non-human morbidity & mortality surveillance
4. Environmental Surveillance Modalities Vector density and infection rate
Sentinel captive birds
Sentinel free-ranging birds
Avian mortality surveillance
Non-human morbidity & mortality surveillance
5. Vector Surveillance Purpose
Monitor populations of mosquitoes
Estimate risk of infectious mosquito bites
Monitor risk in long-term surveillance sites
In traditional transmission foci
In population centers
Determine local risk in response to other indicators of virus activity (such as a human case or a WNV+ dead bird)
6. Number of USA counties reporting vector data toArboNET is stable at about28% (poster #27)
Advantages
Provides a relative measure of risk
PPV of an infected mosquito is about 50% for human cases (poster #27)
Disadvantages
Mosquito ID is labor intensive
Effort is Active, not Passive
Data geographically limited by trapping effort Vector Surveillance
7. Advances in Vector Surveillance Culex vectors well characterized throughout the US and Canada, permitting targeted collection practices
Gravid traps for Cx. pipiens complex
CO2-baited light traps for Cx. salinarius and Cx. tarsalis
Molecular techniques now widely available for:
Culex species ID
Bloodmeal source ID
Vectorial risk indices have been developed
More user-friendly than vectorial capacity equation
Improved mosquito traps
8. Vector Indices Nasci Vector Index
Infection rate (IR) x Trap index (TI)
units = number of infected Culex pipiens per trap night
Kilpatrick modified vector index
IR x TI x competence x human feeding index
Units=number of infectious Cx. pipiens that will bite humans per trap night
Requires more resources but theoretically provides a better estimate of local risk
9. Trap Improvements Updraft gravid trap
Propane-powered mosquito magnet trap
CDC Resting Trap (poster # 77)
10. Avian Mortality Surveillance PURPOSE
Early detection of transmission foci
Confirmation of ongoing local transmission
In some cases, quantify transmission risk (e.g. see Poster #35)
Not the original purpose, but numerous studies across the country have found ways to use dead bird reports and avian carcass testing to quantify transmission and predict risk; more details will be presented and discussed in breakout session Friday evening.
Indirect objectives:
Cooperate with other surveillance systems (e.g. H5N1 AI)
Detect novel pathogens
11. Trends in Data Reporting
12. Advantages Temporally sensitive when effort is intensive early in the season (multiple species targetted)
Spatially sensitive
No longer requires specialized laboratory facilities or skills
Highly cost-efficient due to very high detection rates
13. Disadvantages Triage systems need constant attention
Utility of crows has diminished as predicted
Success depends on strong support and participation from the public and strong interagency cooperation
Poor fit with public health culture
14. Selected advances WNV-pos carcasses (mainly corvids) predicted human cases in Colorado (Patnaik et al. EID 2007)
DYCAST model effective for predicting human risk in California (poster #35)
Sample collection facilitated by using immature feathers (Docherty et al. EID 2004) and mature feathers (poster #13)
15. Mature breast feathers Reduction in sensitivity (52% in WNV-pos. corvid carcasses) offset by ease of sample collection
Cold chain obsolete
No infectious fluids
16. The Big Picture WNV HAS BECOME ENDEMIC
Diminishing resources
Learning to live with WNV does not mean complacency
Creative and cost efficient strategies needed to mitigate an omnipresent risk
Environmental surveillance is crucial to this challenge