310 likes | 1.24k Views
Perspectives on Research Methodology. Darleen Opfer.
E N D
Perspectives on Research Methodology Darleen Opfer
Behind the welter of names – positivism, naturalism, post-positivism, relativism, feminist standpoint epistemology, foundationalism, postmodernism, each with an array of sub-species – lie important questions: Is there a single, absolute truth about educational phenomena, or are there multiple truth? (Or is the concept of truth itself so problematic as to be of no value in understanding the world?) Can we count on our senses or on reason, to distinguish that which is true about the world from that which is false? Are there methods that can lead us close to understanding, or are there inherent indeterminancies in all methods? Is knowledge of the world discovered, or constructed? Can knowledge of the world be evaluated independent of the social and historical contexts in which it exists, or is it always contingent upon, or relative to, particular circumstances? (Pallas, 2003, p.6)
Why Understand Research Epistemology and Ontology? • to understand the interrelationship of the key components of research (including methodology and methods); • to avoid confusion when discussing theoretical debates and approaches to social phenomena; and • to be able to recognize others’, and defend our own, positions.
Ontology claims and assumptions that are made about the nature of social reality, claims about what exists, what it looks like, what units make it up and how these units interact with each other. In short, ontological assumptions are concerned with what we believe constitutes social reality.’Blaikie, 2000, p. 8
Epistemology the possible ways of gaining knowledge of social reality, whatever it is understood to be. In short, claims about how what is assumed to exist can be known. Blaikie, 2000, p. 8
Epistemological Assumptions • Objectivity believes that knowledge exists whether we are conscious of it or not. • Constructionist believes that we come to “know” through our interactions. • Subjectivity believes that everyone has a different understanding of what we know.
Epistemological Continuum Pragmatism Interpretivism Post-Positivism Participatory Positivism Postmodern Objectivity Subjectivity
Epistemological History Interpretivism Postmodern Post-Positivism Participatory Positivism Pragmatism
Assumptions of Post - Positivism • Absolute truth can never be found. • Research is a process of making claims and then testing, refining or abandoning some of them for other claims more strongly warranted. • Data, evidence and rational considerations shape knowledge. • Research seeks to develop relevant, true statements that can serve to explain the situation that is of concern or that describes the causal relationship of interest. • Researchers must examine their methods and conclusions and control or limit bias.
Assumptions of Interpretivism • Meanings are constructed by humans as they engage with the world they are interpreting. • Humans make sense of the world based on their historical and social perspective. They seek to understand the context and then make an interpretation of what they find which is shaped by their own experiences and backgrounds. • The basic generation of meaning is always social.
Assumptions of Participatory • Participatory research is recursive and dialectical and is focused on bring about change in practices. • Begins with a stance about the problems in society. • It is emancipatory. • It is inquiry completed with others rather than on or to others. • The research process is cyclical.
Assumptions of Pragmatism • Is not committed to any one system of philosophy or reality. • Individual researchers have freedom of choice to select procedures that best meet their needs. • Pragmatists do not see the world as an absolute unity. • Truth is what works at the time. • We need to stop asking questions about reality and the laws of nature and start solving problems.
Activity 1: Language Use in Abstracts Read the abstracts provided and underline words which you think may illustrate the epistemological and theoretical assumptions of the researcher.
What methods do you propose to use? • What methodology governs your choice and use of the methods? • What theoretical perspective lies behind the methodology in question? • What epistemology informs this theoretical perspective?
Methods – the techniques or procedures used to gather and analyze data related to some research question of hypothesis • Methodology – the strategy, plan of action, process or design lying behind the choice and use of particular methods and linking the choice and use of methods to desired outcomes. • Theoretical perspective: the philosophical stance informing the methodology and thus providing a context for the process and grounding its logic and criteria. • Epistemology: the theory of knowledge embedded in the theoretical perspective and thereby in the methodology. (how we know what we know)
epistemology theoretical perspective methodology methods
Ontology Epistemology Methodology Methods Sources What’s out there to know? What and how can we know about it? How can we go about acquiring knowledge? What procedures can we use to acquire it? Which data can we collect? Adapted from Hay, 2002, pg. 64
Objectivist Post - Positivist Survey Research Statistical Analysis Putnam’s Social Capital
Constructionist Interpretive Case Study Interviews Coleman’s Social Capital
Activity 2: Your Own Research Diagram Use the blank Crotty Diagram to identify the chain that seems to underlie your own research interests. We will share these when finished.