E N D
Fig. S1. Time courses of CBVa and CBVt (upper row), and CBVv (lower row) from upper (A), middle (B) and lower (C) cortical ROIs (each ROI shown in inserted figure). CBVt and CBVv were obtained at three different baseline conditions, 3.76ml/100g (blue circles), and 4.5 (purple triangles) and 5.0 ml/ 100 g (green squares). Colored solid lines: best fitted curves; black bars: 40-s stimulation period.
CBVt = 3.76 ml/100g A mean CBVv/ mean CBVt (%) CBVt = 4.5 ml/100g B mean CBVv/ mean CBVt (%) CBVt = 5.0 ml/100g C Fig. S2. Stimulus-duration-dependent contribution of venous CBV to total CBV change. Ratios were calculated with three baseline CBVtof 3.76(A), 4.5 (B) and 5.0 ml/ 100 g (C)from upper (blue), middle (pink) and lower (purple) cortical ROIs (each ROI shown in Fig. S1). mean CBVv/ mean CBVt (%) 6 – 10 6 – 15 6 – 20 6 – 25 6 – 30 6 – 35 6 – 40 s Duration after stimulation onset (s)
1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 A CBVv 0 0.3 ml/100g B C CBVt (ml/ 100g) CBVv (ml/ 100g) Distance from cortical surface (mm) Distance from cortical surface (mm) Fig. S3. Time-dependent CBVv maps of one animal shown in Fig. 5 (A), and average cortical profiles of CBVt (B) and CBVv (C), obtained with the assumption of baseline CBVt = 5 ml/100 g.
R2*artery = 150 R2*artery = 130 R2*artery = 110 R2*artery = 90 R2*artery = 70 R2*artery = 50 Intercept (%) R2*artery (s-1) Fig. S4. Simulation of arterial blood volume change depend on R2*of arterial blood (R2*artery ) and its change during stimulation (R2*artery). Simulations were performed with va = 1%; R2*,tissue = 50 s-1; TE = 20 ms; va = 0.2%; and various R2*,artery and its changes. When R2*,artery > R2*,tissue, then va obtained with our simplified assumptions is overestimated. When R2*,artery increases, a is underestimated.