460 likes | 600 Views
HSM Use and Training. Karen K. Dixon, Ph.D., P.E. Oregon State University. Presentation Summary. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Overview of the new HSM. I. WHAT IS THE HSM?. What is the HSM?. The Vision of the HSM - A Document Akin To the HCM. 1. 2. 3. What the HSM is NOT. vs.
E N D
HSM Use and Training Karen K. Dixon, Ph.D., P.E. Oregon State University
Presentation Summary 1 2 3 4 5
Overview of the new HSM I. WHAT IS THE HSM?
What the HSM is NOT vs • The HSM does not set requirements or mandates • The HSM isnot a best practice document for design or operations. • The HSM contains no warrants or standards and does not supersede other publications that do.
The HSM does not establish a legal standard of care nor does it create a duty to the public.
Overview of the new HSM II. Why Do We Need the HSM?
Is This Road “Safe” or “Unsafe”? What does safety really mean?
Highway Safety Has Two Dimensions Examined in reference to compliance with standards, warrants, guidelines and sanctioned design procedures The expected or actual crash frequency and severity for a highway or roadway *Ezra Hauer, ITE Traffic Safety Toolbox Introduction, 1999
Unlike Nominal Safety, Substantive Safety is a Continuum Substantive Safety Nominal Safety CRASH RISK CRASH RISK DESIGN DIMENSION Lane Width, Radius of Curve, Stopping Sight Distance, etc. DESIGN DIMENSION Lane Width, Radius of Curve, Stopping Sight Distance, etc.
Nominal Safety versus Substantive Safety Low Nominal High Substantive High Nominal High Substantive CRASH RISK Low Nominal Low Substantive High Nominal Low Substantive DESIGN DIMENSION Lane Width, Radius of Curve, Stopping Sight Distance, etc.
Substantive Safety May Vary When Nominal Safety Does Not Alternative 1 Existing Conditions Alternative 3 Alternative 2
We’re Interested in Other Impacts for Project Level Decisions – What About Substantive Safety? • Construction • Plans • Cost Models • Real estate • appraisals • DOT databases • HCM • CORSIM • PASSER • TRANSYT7F • VISSIM Design Criteria (nominal safety) • Traffic Noise Model 1.0 • CAL3QHC • Mobile 5a • 3-D Visualization • CITYGREEN The HSM More quantitative Greater weight Safety Environmental Traffic Right-of-Way Costs Impacts Impacts Operations
The HSM Contains Best Science & Research • Synthesis of previous research • New research commissioned by AASHTO and FHWA
Overview of the new HSM III. HOW WAS THE HSM DEVELOPED?
The HSM – A Ten-year Research And Development Effort 1999 2000 2003 2007 2010 Future Research, research and more research
Joint Subcommittee sponsored by 7 TRB committees Thousands of hours of volunteer effort Research program funded by NCHRP, AASHTO & FHWA Significant Effort & Professional Support Produced the HSM
Overview of the new HSM IV. What is Covered by the HSM?
Part BRoadway Safety Management Process Prioritization of Improvement Projects Countermeasure Selection Network Screening 6 7 9 5 8 4 Safety Effectiveness Evaluation Diagnosis Economic Appraisal
Part CPredictive Method • Methodology • Applications • Safety issues not explicitly addressed by the methodology • Example problems • References • Calibration • Combining predicted with observed crashes Special Part C Common Procedures
Definition of HSM Terms • Safety Performance Function (SPF) – a regression equation used for estimating the predicted crash frequency at a site for a given “base condition” • Accident Modification Factor (AMF) – used to adjust the “base condition” in the SPF to specific site characteristics • Calibration Factor (C) – adjusts average crash frequencies calculated from the SPF to local site conditions
Predicting Crashes – Defining Roadway Segments and Intersections
HSM Regional SPF Calibration Step 1 – Identify facility types of interest Step 2 – Select sites for calibration of each facility type Step 3 – Obtain data for each facility type applicable to the calibration period Step 4 – Apply the appropriate Part C predictive model to estimate expected crash frequency for each site during the calibration period Step 5 – Compute calibration factors for use in Part C predictive model
Overview of the new HSM V. WHO SHOULD USE THE HSM?
Assess the system needs & identify projects/studies Program projects Evaluate system-wide safety effects of programs
Define problem(s) and assist in scoping Identify potential solutions Assess or evaluate multiple alternatives and expected quantitative safety effects Aid in identification of a preferred alternative
Evaluate safety of alternative design approaches Assist in review & documentation of design exceptions, variances and waivers Inform decisions on construction staging, work approaches, etc.
Monitor operations to maintain balance among safety, mobility and access. Evaluate the effectiveness of implemented improvements
Overview of the new HSM VI. When Will the HSM be Available?
Training & Outreach Activities • Sept 2009 – Jan 2010 • Conduct two or three multi-state pilot courses • August 2009 • TRB Task Force Meeting • TRB 2010 Annual Meeting • One-day workshop • Training materials, including “Train-the-trainer” available upon HSM release
Overview of the new HSM VII. Where Can One Find More Information About the HSM?
http://www.highwaysafetymanual.org DATA NEEDS GUIDE
Key Contacts • AASHTO • Ken Kobetsky: kenk@aashto.org, (202) 624-5254 • Jim McDonnell: jimm@aashto.org, (202) 624-5448 • Joel McCarroll: jmccarroll@aashto.org, (202) 624-3632 • AASHTO JOINT TASK COMMITTEE FOR THE HSM • Don Vaughn, ALDOT, vaughnd@dot.state.al.us, (334) 242-6319
Key Contacts • TRB/ NCHRP • Rick Pain: rpain@nas.edu, (202)334-2964 • Chuck Niessner: cniessne@nas.edu, (202) 334-1431 • TRB HSM TF: Development of a Highway Safety Manual • John Milton, miltonj@wsdot.wa.gov, (360)704-6363 • TRB HSM TF: User Liaison • Geni Bahar (User Liaison Subcommittee of the TRB HSM Task Force): genibahar@rogers.com, (416) 932-9272 • TRAINING • Karen Dixon (PI of NCHRP Project 17-38): karen.dixon@oregonstate.edu, (541) 737-6337
The End Questions?