1 / 19

Ensuring Compliance Part 2

Ensuring Compliance Part 2. JAQUELINE REESE AND RICHARD SHEAFFER | MAY 12, 2014. Objectives. To remind participants of federal rules regarding Dual Compensation and Conflict of Interest

lila-bright
Download Presentation

Ensuring Compliance Part 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ensuring Compliance Part 2 JAQUELINE REESE AND RICHARD SHEAFFER | MAY 12, 2014

  2. Objectives • To remind participants of federal rules regarding Dual Compensation and Conflict of Interest • To provide scenarios to discuss compliance with rules regarding Dual Compensation and Conflict of Interest

  3. Dual Compensation

  4. Dual Compensation • The Problem • Requirement • Solutions • Scenarios

  5. Dual Compensation The Problem Employees of a unit of government that are paid from a federal award are performing professional services for compensation outside of their regular governmental duties during paid leave time (i.e. annual leave, sick leave, other paid leave) resulting in dual compensation.

  6. Dual Compensation Requirement DHS Grant Guidance: In no case is dual compensation allowable. That is, an employee of a unit of government may not receive compensation from their unit or agency of government AND from an award for a single period of time (i.e. 1:00 pm to 5:00 pm) even though such work may benefit both activities.

  7. Dual Compensation Solutions • Regional Board and Fiduciary (independently or through the Fiduciary’s unit of government): • Should have a Supplemental Employment policy/procedure. • Must ensure through policies and procedures that employees performing work outside of their governmental employment are not performing this service during any period (including leave time) that is compensated by a federal award. • Must have detailed documentation of all employees that perform professional services outside of their governmental duties for compensation, i.e. detailed payroll records that include dates and times of the governmental work and work performed outside the governmental work.

  8. Dual Compensation Scenarios 1. Jerod is a full-time employee (Monday – Friday, 8 am – 5 pm) of Middle County. As an Emergency Manager, a portion of his salary is paid with EMPG funds. Jerod wants to teach (and will be paid) a Haz-Mat training class (which is funded with HSGP funds). A. Jerod plans to take leave time Wednesday from 1-5 pm to teach the class. Would this be Dual Compensation? Why or why not? B. Jerod plans to teach the class from 6-10 pm on Wednesday. Would this be Dual Compensation? Why or why not?

  9. Dual Compensation Scenarios 2. Carol is a full-time (Monday – Friday, 8 am – 5 pm) government employee writing water drainage plans. Carol has been asked to present (and will be paid) at a seminar on Writing Effective Plans (which is funded with HSGP funds). A. Carol will take leave time Monday from 8 am to 12, to present at the seminar. Would this be Dual Compensation? Why or why not? B. Carol will adjust her schedule and work Tuesday – Friday (four 10- hour days). Carol will present at the seminar on Monday from 8 am to 12. Would this be Dual Compensation? Why or why not?

  10. Conflict of Interest

  11. Conflict of Interest • The Problem • Requirement • Solutions • Scenarios

  12. Conflict of Interest The Problem Any employee, member, or agent of a regional planning board or any subcommittee thereof, may not participate in making decisions, approvals, disapprovals, recommendations, or rendering of advice on the use of federal grant money and personally benefit from the participation.

  13. Conflict of Interest Requirement 44 CFR Part 13.36 (b)(3) Grantees and subgrantees will maintain a written code of standards of conduct governing the performance of their employees engaged in the award and administration of contracts.

  14. Conflict of Interest Requirement 44 CFR Part 13.36 (b)(3) No employee, officer or agent of the grantee or subgrantee shall participate in the selection, or in the award or administration of a contract supported by Federal funds if a conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved. Such a conflict would arise when: (i) The employee, officer, or agent, (ii) Any member of his immediate family, (iii) His or her partner, or (iv) An organization which employs, or is about to employ, any of the above, has a financial or other interest in the firm selected for award.

  15. Conflict of Interest Solutions • Regional Board and Fiduciary: • Should have a policy/procedure prohibiting conflict of interest. This should include a disclosure of interest policy/procedure and a supplemental employment policy/procedure. • Must ensure that personnel are informed about conflict of interest procedures. • Must ensure that personnel, procurement and purchasing policies are followed and personnel that have supplemental employment or financial interest in decisions may not participate in the process. • Should actively perform contract monitoring to ensure that purchasing decisions are not conducted with a conflict of interest.

  16. Conflict of Interest Scenarios 1. Bill is a member of the Region 19 Homeland Security Planning Board. Bill owns a company that makes robotic terrorist sniffing dogs (a hypothetical allowable item on the Authorized Equipment List). The Region 19 Board votes to approve a project to purchase 5 robotic terrorist sniffing dogs. An RFP is completed and Bill’s company is selected for the purchase. Is this a conflict of interest? Why or why not?

  17. Conflict of Interest Scenarios 2. Sally is a member of the Region 83 planning subcommittee. Sally is an employee of the city of Sunshine within Region 83. The planning subcommittee determines and votes on the planning projects and budgets for the jurisdictions within the region and submits the projects and budgets to the Region 83 Homeland Security Planning Board. Sally also owns a company that provides planning services, of which there are two individuals that provide planning services for different jurisdictions within Region 83. Is this a conflict of interest? Why or why not?

  18. Conflict of Interest Scenarios 3. Mitch is a member of the Region 47 Homeland Security Planning board. Mitch is an employee of Water County and is the county’s Emergency Manager (partially paid with EMPG funds). Mitch votes on all projects and budgets brought to the Region 47 Homeland Security Planning Board. Is this a conflict of interest? Why or why not?

  19. Questions Jacqueline Reese, Audit Manager Richard Sheaffer, Auditor Phone 517-324-2330 Phone 517-333-4624 Email: reesej@michigan.gov Email: sheafferr@michigan.gov

More Related