130 likes | 232 Views
The Show Must Go On: Elections, United Russia and the Putin Regime Dr Sarah Whitmore, Oxford Brookes University, UK . Elections Do Matter in Russia. As an indicator of incumbent strength and the integrity of the elite coalition To confer democratic legitimacy.
E N D
The Show Must Go On: Elections, United Russia and the Putin RegimeDr Sarah Whitmore, Oxford Brookes University, UK
Elections Do Matter in Russia... • As an indicator of incumbent strength and the integrity of the elite coalition • To confer democratic legitimacy
United Russia’s Role in Putin’s Regime • Russia’s most successful ‘party of power’ • Since 2003, the party was consolidated to perform important functions in Russia’s personalist authoritarian regime: • Managing elites via the party’s domination of legislatures • Managing the masses by promoting a discourse around the ‘national leader’ (2007-11) and by assisting in the managing of elections • BUT remained a personalised, ‘virtual’ party
Duma Elections December 4th 2011 • *in the party list portion of the vote • Duma elections as a ‘presidential primary’ in Russia
Pillars of United Russia’s Electoral Success: 1. The Popularity & Personal Power of Vladimir Putin • Putin as ‘locomotive’ in 2007 • Putin’s falling ratings 2011 (e.g. *approval ratings, Levada Centre) • Active distancing • All-Russian Popular Front (ONF) as rebranding and revitalising • Medvedev ‘poor fit’ • Campaign disarray after September 23rd
Pillars of United Russia’s Electoral Success: 2. Governor-locomotives • 2003 – 28 ‘governors-locomotives’ • 2007 – 65 ‘governor-locomotives’ • But 2004 – end of governors’ direct election & 2009-11 widespread replacement • 2011 – national level figures in ‘difficult’ regions (e.g. Deputy PM Sechin in Stavropol’, kosmonautValentina Tereshkova in Yaroslavl’)
Pillars of United Russia’s Electoral Success: 3. Administrative Resources • Party as beneficiary of connections and resources of state officials who were party members or needed to demonstrate loyalty to the Kremlin to ensure budget receipts • National level electoral populism • Regional electoral clientelism • Ethnic republics • 2011 – more difficult in Russian regions and esp. urban areas
United Russia lost control over the narrative • Stability = stagnation • ‘The Party of Swindlers and Thieves’ reached 46% voters (Levada Centre) • Navalny’s ‘vote for any party except United Russia’ campaign
2011 Elections Results by Region http://en.rian.ru/infographics/20111208/169491066.html
Conclusions • Elections do matter • United Russia – a personalised party • United Russia’s electoral success founded on its connection with personalised leaders at national and regional level, both of which were weakened in 2011 • Poorly managed, reactive campaign • Hegemonic only in provincial and non-Russian regions • Regime lost its ‘aura of invincibility’