80 likes | 251 Views
MODELS 2013. Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, 16th International Conference Miami, Florida - USA 29 September 2013 through 4 October 2013. Papers.
E N D
MODELS 2013 Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, 16th International Conference Miami, Florida - USA29 September 2013 through 4 October 2013
Papers • Farias, Kleinner, et al. "Analyzing the Effort of Composing Design Models of Large-Scale Software in Industrial Case Studies. • Selim, Gehan, et al. "Automated Verification of Model Transformations in the Automotive Industry." • Fondement, Frédéric, et al. "Big Metamodels Are Evil."
Analyzing the Effort of Composing Design Models of Large-Scale Software in Industrial Case Studies MC Composition effort Different changes Influential factors Steps: Model Composition Detect inconsistencies Resolve them Industry cases: KleinnerFarias[unisinos.br], Alessandro Garcia[inf.puc-rio.br], Jon Whittle[Lancaster University, UK], and Carlos Lucena [inf.puc-rio.br]
Analyzing the Effort of Composing Design Models of Large-Scale Software in Industrial Case Studies Critical factors - > Effort to combine design models(1), detect(2) & resolve inconsistencies(3) in practice 5 industry cases: MC-> to evolve and reconcile large-scale design models AIMS: 1. the extent of composition effort >changes 2. identifying and analyzing their influential factors. HOW: A series of 297 evolution scenarios was performed on the target systems, leading to more than 2 million compositions of model elements. FINDINGS: 1. the inconsistency resolution effort is much higher than the upfront effort to apply the composition technique and detect inconsistencies; 2. the developer’s reputation significantly influences the resolution of conflicting changes; 3. and the evolutions dominated by additions required less effort. KleinnerFarias[unisinos.br], Alessandro Garcia[inf.puc-rio.br], Jon Whittle[Lancaster University, UK], and Carlos Lucena [inf.puc-rio.br]
Automated Verification of Model Transformations in the Automotive Industry. PROBLEM: automated verification of industrial model transformations GM-to-AUTOSAR transformation verification -> the satisfiabilityof a transformation model, with respect to well-formedness OCL constraints. IMPLEMENTATION: A prototype for the ATL language to reason about the correctness of an ATL RESULTS: 1. the verification results of this transformation 2. the practicality of using such tools on industrial size problems Gehan M. K. Selim[Queen's University, CA], Fabian Buttner[INRIA, Nantes, France], James R. Cordy[Queen's University, CA], JuergenDingel[Queen's University, CA], and Shige Wang[General Motors Research,US] 146 corporate members as of October 2012 VCS
Automated Verification of Model Transformations in the Automotive Industry. Gehan M. K. Selim[Queen's University, CA], Fabian Buttner[INRIA, Nantes, France], James R. Cordy[Queen's University, CA], JuergenDingel[Queen's University, CA], and Shige Wang[General Motors Research,US]
Big Metamodels Are EvilPackage Unmerge - A Technique for Downsizing Metamodels PROBLEM & MOTIVATION: Reuse -> keeping irrelevant concerns in derived elements Additive techniques [profiling & package merge] -> harmful overheads of complexity for both tool builders and users CONTRIBUTION: «package unmerge» - a proposal for a subtractive relation between packages FrédéricFondement, Pierre-Alain Muller, Laurent Thiry, Brice Wittmann, and GermainForestier - Université de Haute Alsace,France
Big Metamodels Are EvilPackage Unmerge - A Technique for Downsizing Metamodels FrédéricFondement, Pierre-Alain Muller, Laurent Thiry, Brice Wittmann, and GermainForestier - Université de Haute Alsace,France