290 likes | 406 Views
A proposal for a construction of a Child Indicator System to certify Bolivian Municipalities as “Child Friendly”. ISCI 2009 UWS, Australia. Bolivia in numbers. New Development Paradigm in Bolivia. Particular new Political conditions: New indigenous government New political constitution
E N D
A proposal for a construction of a Child Indicator System to certify Bolivian Municipalities as “Child Friendly” ISCI 2009 UWS, Australia
New Development Paradigm in Bolivia • Particular new Political conditions: • New indigenous government • New political constitution • Bolivia as a communitarianplurinational, intercultural, descentralized, and withautonomies, State. • Humans Rights-Based approach • Child rights • New Social Contract
National Development Plan • “Vivir Bien” (‘Living Good’) concept and policy • Local & Community Development Plan • Decentralized Public Administration (management) • Municipality as basic axis of public management (15 years of experience)
A development model from the municipal level • Municipalities have today more powers and duties (legislative, budgetary, political competences) • They can be part of national policies in a voluntary capacity • Municipal institutional development plan: • Local economic development • Social policies with an integral approach • New development paradigm and new axis around municipalities give basis for MAN policy
Child Friendly Municipality (MAN) • A public policy with meaning for municipalities: • Orders public supply • Centered in Human Capital • Political recognition to local authorities • Fiscal recognition • COMMUNITARIAN LOGIC • Participation • Prestige • Lines up with prevailing development approach
Municipal Infant, Child and Adolescent Rights Development Index – IDINA – GOB/UNICEF The IDINA is a composite index which documents progress at the municipal level, based on mortality, health, education and protection indicators. Values are established ranging from 0 to 1. The closer the result is to the value of 1, the greater the degree of child rights promotion and protection in a given municipality. Highest 0.804 La Paz (La Paz) 0.622 National Average Lowest 0.251 Alalay (Cochabamba) Of 319 municipalities surveyed, close to 60% have a child rights compliance index of low to medium-low Source: UDAPE-UNICEF, Índice de Desarrollo Municipal de la Infancia, Niñez y Adolescencia, 2008
VulnerabilityAssessmentMonitoring (WFP) 79% of Bolivia’s municipalities have medium to very high vulnerability to food and nutrition insecurity. Children and pregnant women most vulnerable. Source: UDAPE-PMA, Diagnóstico modelo y atlas de seguridad alimentaria en Bolivia, 2008
Urban vs. Rural population Fuente: ÌNE CNPV 2001
Child Friendly Municipality Index (CFMI) for Bolivia • Previous: • Define administrative unit: municipality • Select which municipalities will compete: voluntary selection • Incorporating HHRR-based approach in goals: • Multidimensional (MDGs-like) goals • CRC orientation • Identifying Dimensions for social promotion • Participative goals • SMART indicators • Participative deliberation method • Selecting social gaps with local meaning • Clustering in ‘alike’ municipalities • Selecting Indicators • Certifying as Child Friendly
Certification to improve living standards for children Vertical Competition: internal to the municipality; to improve positive indicators, management and participation Horizontal Competition: Fair competition with similar municipalities (CLUSTERING)
The process of certification • Criteria for clustering is not the CFMIndex • Establish a simple ‘easy to understand’ methodology • Defining goals: geared towards improving lives of children & adolescents: based in a children rights-based approach • Defining activities to reach goals • Selection of indicators: life cycle approach from pregnancy to adolescence • Building capacity: beginning with a few number of goals and activities
Constructing the index (selecting dimensions and grouping indicators)
Final questions • Simplicity versus gathering relevant information (social impact) • Clustering methods: mobile or fixed groups of municipalities through the process? • Different requirements/benchmarks for different clusters according to level of development? • How to weight of indicators and promotion areas into a composite index?