1 / 15

Precision Engagement

Full Dimensional Protection. Operational Concepts. END STATES Active and passive measures tailored to the threat Identify and defeat enemy threat rapidly Protect assets from individual to theater level. Requires. Early Detection and Warning. Common operational picture. Active and

lillian-lancaster
Download Presentation

Precision Engagement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Full Dimensional Protection Operational Concepts END STATES Active and passive measures tailored to the threat Identify and defeat enemy threat rapidly Protect assets from individual to theater level Requires Early Detection and Warning • Common operational picture Active and Passive Measures • Combat ID Multi-layered Defenses • Theater air missile defense • Networked sensors Full Dimensional Protection Others… Concept Dominant Maneuver Precision Engagement Technological Innovation Information Superiority Focused Logistics Focused Logistics Network Centric

  2. Requires • END STATES • Integrated alliance and coalition capabilities • Coalitions that leverage the strengths of each partner • Enhanced lethal and non-lethal capability in offensive & defensive ops • Coalition doctrine, training, and ed. • Routine, Integrated, full spectrum multi-national planning &, training • Proactive coalition building • International involvement in all phases of JV2010: concept development, assessment, integration Others... JV2010 Beyond DOD-Coalitions Concept Dominant Maneuver Precision Engagement Technological Innovation Information Superiority Focused Logistics Focused Logistics Coalition Full Dimensional Protection Network Centric

  3. Requires • END STATES • “Operationalized” PDD 56 • Integrated Pol-mil plan before execution • Improved integration of US agencies, military & NGO/PVOs • An effective, integrated, proactive, quick-reacting unified action process • Integrated policy decisions and execution process across the spectrum of conflict • National security vision • Common operational picture • Collaborative planning tools • Integrated decision-support systems • Improved doctrine, training and education, leader development programs Others... INTEGRATION OF USG AGENCIES, DOD, & NGO/PVOs JV2010 Beyond DOD--Interagency Concept Dominant Maneuver Network Centric Interagency Precision Engagement CIA DOS Technological Innovation NSC PVOs NGOs Information Superiority USIA DOD DOJ Focused Logistics Coalition and Full Dimensional Protection

  4. Emerging Operational Concepts Enabled By Information Superiority And Technological Innovation ... Fused Through Co-evolution of DOTML-P Full Spectrum Dominance Dominant Maneuver D O T M L P Precision Engagement Synergism achieved only through co-evolution of: Joint Doctrine Agile Organizations Joint Training & Education Enhanced Materiel Innovative Leadership, and High Quality People Full Spectrum Dominance Technological Innovation Coalition and Interagency Information Superiority Focused Logistics Full Dimensional Protection

  5. Land Sea Land Sea Air Special Ops Air Special Ops Forging Tomorrow’s Force INTEGRATION • JV 2010 implementation focuses on: • Joint Capabilities • Seams Between Service Core Competencies • Breakthrough Warfighting Concepts Past Develop the breakthrough concepts “This vision of future warfighting embodies the improved intelligence and command and control available in the information age … to develop (the) four operational concepts” Joint Vision 2010 Focus on the seams “greater than the power of 4” “moving beyond interoperability to truly joint operations” Future

  6. JVWG OO JRB/ DEPOPSDEPS Coordinating Authorities OO Concepts Assess OPSDEPS OOO Design ACOM JWFC Coordinating Authorities JROC Doctrine Organization Training & Ed Materiel Leadership People CINCs JTASC OOOO QDR/NDP Agencies JSR JBC NSS/NMS Services JCS Battle Labs OOOO Prepare Conduct Integration JV Implementation Process Roadmaps ACOM Campaign Plans Recommendations Desired Operational Capabilities 21st Century Challenges Concept Development Assessment

  7. 21st Century Challenges J-6 Information Superiority Information Transport & Processing Battlespace Awareness (w/ J-2) Information Operations (w/ J-3) J-8 Technological Innovation Enabling Concepts / Challenges J-8 Dominant Maneuver Decisive Combat Ops Crisis Stabilization Rapid Joint Force Projection Battlespace Control J-8 Precision Engagement Generating Precision Effects Integrating Precision Effects J-8 Full Dimensional Protection Countering Air and Missile Threats Combating Terrorism Combat Identification J-4 Focused Logistics Information Fusion Joint Deployment / Rapid Distribution Force Medical Protection Agile Infrastructure Multinational Logistics Joint Theater Logistics Management Operational Concepts / Challenges J-7 / ACOM Full Spectrum Dominance Joint Command & Control (w/ J-3) Unified Action Shape the Environment

  8. JVWG OO JRB/ DEPOPSDEPS Coordinating Authorities OO Concepts Assess OPSDEPS OOO Design ACOM JWFC Coordinating Authorities JROC Doctrine Organization Training & Ed Materiel Leadership People CINCs JTASC OOOO QDR/NDP Agencies JSR JBC NSS/NMS Services JCS Battle Labs OOOO Prepare Conduct Integration JV Implementation Process Roadmaps ACOM Campaign Plans Recommendations Desired Operational Capabilities 21st Century Challenges Concept Development Assessment

  9. JV2010 Leadership Responsibilities SecDef • Provides guidance on national security policy and objectives CJCS • Assists President/SecDef in providing for the strategic direction of the military • Develops doctrine for the joint employment of the armed forces • Formulates policy for joint training and coordinating the military education and training of armed forces Title X CJCS • Responsible for JV 2010 implementation • Oversees USCINCACOM joint experimentation program • Oversees USCINCACOM joint concept development USCINCACOM • Executive Agent for Joint Experimentation • Conduct joint concept and capabilities experiments • Create/explore joint warfighting concepts for joint experimentation • Recommend to CJCS joint concepts/capabilities for further assessment/JE SecDef Charter for JE

  10. 100 0 E 950 W ACOM ACOM FORSCOM MARFOR LANT CENTCOM AIR COMBAT COMMAND CINCLANT FLEET EUCOM PACOM SOUTHCOM 920 W 300 W 170 E ACOM: EA FOR EXPERIMENTATION • Combatant Commander • Suitable Component Forces for experimentation • Five CCAs provide tailored capabilities • Fits well with Integrator role

  11. USACOM Joint Warfighting Experimentation Charter CINCUSACOM Champions Future Joint Warfighting Capabilities • Executive Agent for joint warfighting experimentation (JWE) • Experimentation supports JV 2010implementation • Design, prepare, conduct and assess JWE • Leverage DOD experimentation activities • Joint Concept Development • Create and explore new joint warfighting concepts and capabilities • Integrateandassessconcepts from Services, CINCs and other sources • Services retain primary responsibility to develop concepts, conduct experimentation within core competencies • Recommendfuture joint warfighting requirements in DOTMLP terms

  12. USACOM Campaign plan 21st Century Challenges May 98 APR 99 Desired Operational Capabilities Oct 98 Joint Vision Implementation Master Plan Assessment Roadmaps Nov 98 JV 2010 - Where we’ve come ... The ‘VISION’ May 97 Jul 96 Implementation ProcessSep 97 USACOM Charter May 98 JV 2010 Management Dec 98 Concepts for Experimentation • Common Relevant Operational Picture • Joint Attack Ops Against Critical Mobile Targets • Future Collaborative Information Environment • Joint Contingency Force Operations • Focused Logistics: Enabling Early Decisive Ops • Adaptive Joint C2 • Interoperable Combat ID • Surveillance and Fires from Space JV2010 Concept Development

  13. JVWG OO JRB/ DEPOPSDEPS Coordinating Authorities OO Concepts Assess OPSDEPS OOO Design ACOM JWFC Coordinating Authorities JROC Doctrine Organization Training & Ed Materiel Leadership People CINCs JTASC OOOO QDR/NDP Agencies JSR JBC NSS/NMS Services JCS Battle Labs OOOO Prepare Conduct Integration JV Implementation Process Roadmaps ACOM Campaign Plans Recommendations Desired Operational Capabilities 21st Century Challenges Concept Development Assessment

  14. J1 J2 J3 J4 J5 J6 J7 J8 BA IPT C2 IPT FL CA IS CA FSD CA PE CA DM CA FDP CA TI CA JV 2010 Implementation Approve Findings and Recommendations (DOTMLP) ACOM Findings and Recommendations (DOTMLP) CJCS/JCS Review & comment JRB/ DepOpsDeps M OSD/DRB DOTLP JROC OPSDEPS J7 Joint Staff Integration CINCs J7 Joint Staff Integration • Develop/integrate Implementation Actions • Establish tasks, milestones • Task actions • Track progress • Advise seniorleaders on JV 2010, JE progress Services CA CA Defense Agencies CA DTL P O M Joint Staff Directors Joint Staff Coordinating Authorities

  15. Fully Operational Jt DOC JPME UJTL Concept Development Co-Evolving DOTMLP Sequential Evolution Doctrine Train & Ed Leader Dev Co-Evolution - Results: Concepts fielded quicker - Requires: Integrated processes - Characterized by: Joint community involvement throughout process Doctrine Fully Operational Integration Assessment Develop Leader Education Train & Time

More Related