1 / 24

Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project

Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project. Presented at the National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program District of Columbia 15 April 2009. Albert A. Kruger. Las Vegas. Outline. Background Waste Generation at Hanford Waste Storage & Feed Delivery

liluye
Download Presentation

Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project Presented at the National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program District of Columbia 15 April 2009 Albert A. Kruger

  2. Las Vegas

  3. Outline • Background • Waste Generation at Hanford • Waste Storage & Feed Delivery • Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Project • Update • Next Steps

  4. Generation of Hanford Tank Wastes Tank Farms (1944 - present) 9 Reactors; 4 Fuel Reprocessing Flowsheets; 100,000 MT Fuel Processed

  5. Hanford’s B Reactor, as it stood in 1945

  6. Hanford Tank Waste Cleanup Challenge Total Number of Gallons in Waste Tanks at DOE Sites: Idaho 1.4 Million (1.6%) Hanford has: • 63% of DOE tanks; 80% of DOE single-shell tanks • 58% of DOE total tank waste • ~194 million curies of radioactivity • ~190,000 tons of chemicals Hanford 53 Million (58%) Savannah River 36.5 Million (40%) Oak Ridge 0.4 Million (0.4%)

  7. Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) The world’s largest radioactive waste treatment plant Major Facilities • Pretreatment (PT) Facility • Low Activity Waste (LAW) Vitrification Facility • High Level Waste (HLW) Vitrification Facility • Analytical Laboratory • Balance of Facilities HLW Facility Commodities Concrete 88,000 CY Structural Steel 9,600 Ton Pipe 160,000 ft HVAC 571 Ton Cable Tray 45 miles Cable 293 miles

  8. SUPERNATANT SLUDGE WTP Flow Sheet – Key Process Flows LAW Vitrification (90+% of waste mass) Maximize Mass Pretreatment (solid/liquid separation – Cs, Sr, TRU removal) HLW Vitrification (90+% of waste activity) Maximize Activity Hanford Tank Waste

  9. How is the Vitrified Waste Dispositioned? • High Level Waste Canisters • 4.5 x 0.61 m (2’ x 14.77’) • 6,600 pounds of glass • 480 canisters to be produced/year • Storage at Hanford until a final disposal baseline is identified • Low Activity Waste Containers • 4’ x 7.5’ • 13,000 pounds of glass • 1,300 containers to be produced/year • Disposed on Hanford Site

  10. Aerial View of the Waste Treatment Plant $12.2 B 2019 Completion Project 46% complete ~3300 staff

  11. HLW Vitrification HLW Vitrification Facility Feb. 2009 Design 77% Complete Construction 23% Complete 4 Stories (0’, 14’, 37’, 58’) 281’ Wide x 448’ Long 120’ Tall (Bottom of Basemat @ -21’ to Roof) 11

  12. IHLW Waste Form Compliance Plan for the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Reviewed by EM-12 / Technical Review Group • Denis Koutsandreas, TRG Team Leader, Office of Disposal Operations, EM-12 • Anthony Kluk, Office of Disposal Operations, EM-12 • Mark Senderling, Office of Disposal Operations, EM-12 • Nicholas Machara, Office of Waste Processing, EM-21 • Steven Ross, Office of Waste Processing, EM-21 • Mark Rawlings, Office of Project Management Oversight, EM-53 • Kenneth Picha, Office of Safety Management and Operations, EM-60 • Kriss Grisham, Office of Safety Management, EM-61 • Steven Gomberg, Waste Management Office, RW-9 • Markus Popa, Waste Management Office, RW-9 • Joseph May, Thomas Jefferson Site Office, SC-TJSO • Jeffrey W. Ray, SRS WSRC

  13. Contents of the IHLW Waste Form Compliance Plan

  14. Contents of the IHLW Waste Form Qualification Report • Chemical and Radionuclide Composition Projections for Immobilized High Level Waste Product Qualification; 24590-HLW-RPT-RT-08-001-01 • Chemical and Radionuclide Composition During Production for Immobilized High Level Waste Product Qualification; 24590-HLW-RPT-RT-08-001-02 • Product Consistency and Phase Stability for Immobilized High Level Waste Product Qualification; 24590-HLW-RPT-RT-08-001-03 • Hazardous Waste Specification for Immobilized High Level Waste Product Qualification; 24590-HLW-RPT-RT-08-001-04 • Canister Description for Immobilized High-Level Waste Product Qualification; 24590-HLW-RPT-RT-08-001-05 • Canister Fabrication and Closure for Immobilized High Level Waste Product Qualification; 24590-HLW-RPT-RT-08-001-06 • Exclusion of Foreign Materials for Immobilized High Level Waste Product Qualification; 24590-HLW-RPT-RT-08-001-07 • Canister Fill Height for Immobilized High Level Waste Product Qualification; 24590-HLW-RPT-RT-08-001-08 • Canister Decontamination for Immobilized High Level Waste Product Qualification; 24590-HLW-RPT-RT-08-001-09 • Canister Drop Testing for Immobilized High Level Waste Product Qualification; 24590-HLW-RPT-RT-08-001-10 • Quality Assurance for Immobilized High Level Waste Product Qualification; 24590-HLW-RPT-RT-08-001-11 • Documentation for Immobilized High Level Waste Product Qualification; 24590-HLW-RPT-RT-08-001-12 • Supplemental Contract Requirements for Immobilized High Level Waste Product Qualification; 24590-HLW-RPT-RT-08-001-13

  15. Supplemental Contract Requirements for Immobilized High Level Waste Product Qualification Contents History Sheet Acronyms and Other Abbreviations 1 Introduction 2 IHLW WCP Commitments 2.1 Product and Disposal Requirements (Contract Specification 1.2.2.1.1) 2.2 Canister System (Contract Specification 1.2.2.1.2) 2.3 Fill Height (Contract Specification 1.2.2.1.3.1) 2.4 Maximum Heat Generation Rate (Contract Specification 1.2.2.1.3.2) 2.5 Surface Contamination Limitations (Contract Specification 1.2.2.1.3.3) 2.6 Condition at Delivery (Contract Specification 1.2.2.1.4) 2.7 Dangerous and Hazardous Waste Requirements (Contract Specification 1.2.2.1.5) 2.8 Product Loading (Contract Specification 1.2.2.1.6) 2.9 Product Handling (Contract Specification 1.2.3.1) 2.10Quality Assurance (Contract Specification 1.3) 2.11Inspection and Acceptance (Contract Specification 1.4) 3 References 3.1 Essential Documents 3.2 Developmental Documents Appendices Appendix A WAPS and WASRD Requirements in the IHLW WCP

  16. Contents of the IHLW Waste Form Qualification Report

  17. Road Map to Support Acceptance of WTP IHLW Product

  18. Plan for Quality Assurance Surveillances of DOE/ORP and BNI HLW Programs • Phase 1(8-11 September 2008) • Address and support elements of the compliance based audit to take place in Phase 3 • Conclusion: Phase 2 of the qualification process for the BNI program is to be initiated based on the results of Phase 1 surveillances which demonstrated that BNI has established an acceptable HLW QA program. (“The surveillance team determined that there was tremendous progress in developing technical compliance documentation since the assessments conducted in early 2007 by ORP and HQ.”) • Phase 2 • Document review and RW acceptance of the initial QARD Requirements Matrix and implementing procedures in conjunction with a technical review and RW concurrence of the HLW technical baseline documents. • Phase 3 • Initial compliance-based audit of the ORP and BNI QA programs to evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of their QAPs implementation for QARD compliance…

  19. Backup

  20. Hanford Cleanup Site

  21. Pretreatment Facility Pretreatment Facility Feb. 2009 Design 72% Complete Construction 27% Complete 5 Stories (0’, 28’, 56’, 77’, 98’) 250’ Wide x 558’ Long + 28’ wide loading bay/dock 119’ Tall (Top of Basemat at Grade to Roof) 21

  22. LAW Vitrification LAW Vitrification Facility Feb. 2009 Design 88% Complete Construction 58% Complete 22

  23. Analytical Laboratory Analytical Laboratory Feb. 2009 Design 74% Complete Construction 53% Complete 23

  24. Balance of Facilities BOF Switchgear Building Chiller/Compressor Plant Glass Former Facility Foundation Steam Plant Fuel Oil Storage Facility 24

More Related