1 / 36

The Philippines AMORE Project: Renewable Energy as a Catalyst for Social and Economic Development

The Philippines AMORE Project: Renewable Energy as a Catalyst for Social and Economic Development. Ellen S. Bomasang. APEC Village Power Workshop November 7-10, 2004 Hanmer Springs, Canterbury, New Zealand. Winrock International. Private non-government organization

liluye
Download Presentation

The Philippines AMORE Project: Renewable Energy as a Catalyst for Social and Economic Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Philippines AMORE Project: Renewable Energy as a Catalyst for Social and Economic Development Ellen S. Bomasang APEC Village Power Workshop November 7-10, 2004 Hanmer Springs, Canterbury, New Zealand

  2. Winrock International • Private non-government organization • Currently implementing more than 160 projects around the world • Headquarters in state of Arkansas • Project offices in more than 40 countries • Energy programs based in Arlington, Virginia

  3. Winrock’s Core Programs • Clean Energy • Agriculture • Forestry and Natural Resource Management • Ecosystems Services • Leadership Development • Volunteer Technical Assistance

  4. Clean Energy Group (CEG) Premise: Energy is a crucial input to development, and its growth can be met in an environmentally sustainable manner Goal: Increase the use of environmentally sustainable renewable energy (RE) services in a manner that enhances socio-economic development

  5. CEG Products and Services • Technical Assistance • Project and program preparation and implementation/management • Policy analysis and guidance • Institutional capacity building • Business advisory services • Education and outreach • Financing facilitation

  6. Clean Energy Group (CEG) • Focus on • Community mobilization and Building local capacity in RE • Accelerating RE commercialization and market development • Improving access to rural energy services • Focus on socially and economically productive applications • Facilitating industry linkages • Renewable Energy Project Support Office (REPSO) network in Brazil, Guatemala, Nepal, India, Indonesia, South Africa, and the Philippines

  7. Alliance for Mindanao Off-Grid Renewable Energy (AMORE) Program

  8. Background on Project Area • One of poorest regions, lowest level of public services (e.g., electricity, education, water, health) • Conflict area with peace and order problems • Former separatist rebel communities, long-time rebel soldiers attempting civilian lives and livelihoods • Some areas still contested/subject of peace negotiations • High risk of violence, including political, inter-clan conflicts, robbery, kidnapping • Heavily armed population with military weapons • Many private companies limit activities for safety and security reasons

  9. AMORE: Mission Statement • Contribute to peace and development initiatives in Muslim Mindanao by improving the quality of life in unelectrified rural communities through sustainable renewable energy projects and effective community organizing

  10. AMORE: Project Objectives • Support electrification of 160+ rural communities (barangays) in Mindanao using renewable energy systems for lighting, productive uses, and social infrastructure • Support peace process by working with former rebel communities for social and economic development • Project duration: February 2002 – December 2004

  11. AMORE Sites

  12. Stakeholders • U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) • Philippine Government, Philippine Department of Energy (DOE) • Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) • Winrock International (project implementer / manager) • Mirant Philippines (private sector donor)

  13. Stakeholders • Beneficiary communities • Sub-grantees/subcontractors (PEI, YAMOG, MDFI, YMFI, SIBAT, SRE, MUFTI, IRG-P, NREL, WorldWater, NMSU • Other Philippine partners (rural electric cooperatives, Philippine Government agricultural, fisheries, micro-credit, SciTech, power sector agencies, and private foundations) • Stakeholders have complimentary goals that need to be balanced: project cannot be focused just on renewable energy development and RE market development

  14. Stakeholders’ Interests/Goals (1) • USAID and Philippine Government: Support peace & development in Mindanao, ensure communities benefit, support clean energy development • Philippine DOE: Electrify all barangays in country, with at least 30 households served in each barangay • ARMM Government: Support development, convince residents that peace accord & regional government provide benefits • Mirant Philippines: Help meet its commitment to DOE of supporting electrification of 1,000+ communities

  15. Stakeholders’ Interests/Goals (2) Beneficiary communities: access to improved energy and other services, social and economic development • Winrock: Support peace & development, effectively implement project while balancing stakeholders interests • Compromises necessary due to competing goals: • Focus on number of barangays, not full electrification of barangays; • Focus on community organization & social, economic & institutional development instead of exclusive focus on energy systems

  16. MIRANT Philippines • Largest independent power producer (IPP) in Philippines • Mirant funds rural electrification, in part as a legal obligation, in part as corporate donation • Providing more than $1.5 million in donations (approximately $13,000/barangay) • Cooperation with Winrock under AMORE supports the Philippine DOE’s policy of relying in part on IPPs to co-finance and implement rural electrification projects

  17. Renewable Energy Technologies Used • Solar PV battery charging stations (BCS), solar home systems (SHS), streetlights, telecom, power systems for other applications • Micro-hydro (5 prepared, 3 implemented) • Biomass (thermal applications) • Wind power not used due to low wind resource in project area • PV BCS supported in part due to concerns about inability to enforce monthly fees (too dangerous to repossess SHS for nonpayment), PV focus now on SHS, communications, education

  18. Project Approach • Not renewable energy (RE) development or RE market development per se • Use RE for basic service and as catalyst to organize communities for social and economic development • In marginalized/neglected communities, the RE interventions have major impacts on peoples’ perception of benefits of peace and hope for future • Difficult environment prevented on commercial approaches to energy system/service supply • Work with BRECDAs to prepare and implement social and livelihood projects, including both RE and/or non-energy projects • Maximize links between BRECDAs and vendors for repair, parts, market expansion, battery recycling

  19. Community Level Institutions • Due to lack of producer cooperatives or other pre-existing organizations in most AMORE communities, institutions had to be created to manage energy systems and collect fees. • BRECDAs (Barangay Renewable Energy and Community Development Associations) were formed • Main BRECDA tasks: • Operate and maintain energy systems; • Collect fees and manage O&M fund; • If possible, expand service to additional households AND • Pursue other economic and social development activities

  20. Barangay Renewable Energy and Community • Development Association (BRECDA) • BRECDA composed of electrified households, with elected Chairperson and Treasurer, employs local operator or technician • Manages fee collection, O&M fund accounts • Systems/service is subsidized, but users must pay monthly fees: $3 (U.S.)/month for service via battery charging station (BCS); $5.40/month for solar home system (SHS) • O&M fund supports repair, partial cost of battery replacement, expansion of service to new households • BRECDAs formally register, establish bank accounts • Winrock provides training in financial management, leadership, and livelihood project preparation

  21. O&M Fee Structure for Barangays with PV BCS Systems * The balance will be paid by the member upon battery replacement.

  22. Sample O&M Fee Structure forBarangays w/ Solar Home Systems * The balance will be paid by the member upon battery replacement.

  23. Projects Supported • Basic electrification for lighting andHH uses is major focus in all communities (minimum 30 HH) • Social/community services: street/dock lighting (all), communications, water supply, school electrification (others in 25+, ) • Income-generating livelihood activities • Productive use of RE (15+ pilots/demos) • Other improvements to production and marketing, including many with no energy intervention (30+)

  24. Social Project Example: Telephony • Evaluate technical options, institutional approach • Supervised payphones in central barangay locations • Testing different business models • Use of cellular (fixed or handset) or fixed satellite technologies depending on service availability • Six GSM fixed cellular payphones and two fixed satellite phones installed by November 2004 • Modest revenue generation for most BRECDAs with donated handset • Expanded rollout planned under AMORE 2

  25. Other Social Pilot Projects • School Electrification/Distance education • Collaboration with Knowledge Channel • Dual-use mini-cinema (TV-DVD) for both entertainment and educational purposes • Limited computer/ICT (2 communities) • Potable water supply • Health • Link BRECDAs with malaria prevention program of Shell Pilippinas Foundation (i.e., leverage BRECDA institution)

  26. Two Main Types of Livelihoodor Productive Use Projects • Productive use of renewable energy: mostly pilot and demonstration projects • Solar thermal and biomass thermal for drying • Micro-hydro for milling, workshop • Pumping/micro-irrigation for high-value crops • Aquaculture • Livelihood projects w/no energy component • Improved seaweed production (Lantay, credit) • Gravity-fed micro-irrigation for vegetables * Can also provide TA for non-RE energy interventions (e.g. diesel-powered ice-making)

  27. Livelihood Projects Livelihood Project ApproachPartner Agencies DOST, BFAR, UNDP TLRC, DTI • Work with BRECDAs/producers to assess options • Build on existing economic activities • Carragenan seaweed production • Fishing, aquaculture • Agriculture

  28. Livelihood/Productive Use Projects: Forms of AMORE Support • Technical assistance • Information dissemination • Capacity building • Assessment of productive use energy requirements and options (e.g., drying) • Capital funding for productive use field projects including demos, pilots, other • Financing facilitation (QUEDANCOR)

  29. AMORE’s Implementation Strategy for Productive Projects • Assess existing livelihood to identify potential productive application of RE, AND/OR other ways to improve to production, post-harvest, and marketing • Prepare feasibility study • Prepare plans using participatory process • Focus on productive use of RE

  30. AMORE’s Implementation Strategy for Productive Projects • Design and implement training for the BRECDA and members to manage/implement the project • Facilitate access of BRECDAs to funding or credit institutions and market information • Monitor implementation & institute needed improvement as needed • Document experiences of implementation

  31. Productive Demonstrationand Pilot Projects • Solar and biomass-fired drying for fish, rice, grain, seaweed • Micro-irrigation for high-value vegetable production (PV and treadle pumping) • Grain and coffee milling (micro-hydro) • Aquaculture—lighting, modest aeration • Ice-making (TA only, for diesel-powered system) • In AMORE 2, increased focus on micro-hydro, including for productive uses, and on community-based natural resource management (CBNRM)

  32. Accomplishments • Electrified 141 communities and over 4,240 households with PV and micro-hydro by 8/2004 • More than 200 communities and 6,300 households to be electrified by 12/31/2004 • 170 Barangay Renewable Energy and Community Development Associations (BRECDA) to manage energy systems and implement economic development activities (205 by 12/31/2004) • Trained BRECDA members on technical issues, administrative and financial management

  33. Accomplishments • Contributed to peace process by engaging with historically neglected communities • Recognition by USAID, Philippine government, private donors, and communities of AMORE project performance and benefits • Positive performance & community requests have led to follow-on AMORE II project (FY2005-09) • Developed/piloted models (e.g., rural telephony) for broader implementation in AMORE 2

  34. AMORE 2 Follow-On Project • October 2004-September 2009 (implementation starts 1/2005) • Target: At least 200 barangays including 20 micro-hydro (11,600 households) • Support peace & development in conflict-affection regions through provision of basic rural electrification and related services

  35. AMORE 2 Follow-On Project • Strengthen community abilities to effectively manage natural resources and implement economic development activities, • Micro-hydro sector strengthening to improve ability of Philippine industry and NGOs to assess, plan, and implement micro-hydro projects

  36. AMORE 2 Changes vs. AMORE • Increased focus on use of renewable energy for high value social and productive applications • Major focus on microhydro development • Community-based natural resource management activities, including watershed protection • Develop lower-cost household lighting options, increase cost-recovery

More Related