1 / 18

Wind driven seasonal variations in the transport of NAW through the Faroe-Shetland Channel

Wind driven seasonal variations in the transport of NAW through the Faroe-Shetland Channel. Toby Sherwin Scottish Association for Marine Science, Oban Acknowledgements: Bill Turrell, Sarah Hughes, Bee Berx (Marine Scotland), Bogi Hansen (FFL), Svein Ø sterhus (UiB). also acknowledge:

liluye
Download Presentation

Wind driven seasonal variations in the transport of NAW through the Faroe-Shetland Channel

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Wind driven seasonal variations in the transport of NAW through the Faroe-Shetland Channel Toby Sherwin Scottish Association for Marine Science, Oban Acknowledgements: Bill Turrell, Sarah Hughes, Bee Berx (Marine Scotland), Bogi Hansen (FFL), Svein Østerhus (UiB) • also acknowledge: • European Commission (MOEN – ASOF EU-E, Framework V) based on: Sherwin, T.J., Hughes, S.L., Turrell, W.R., Hansen, B., Østerhus, S., 2008. Wind-driven monthly variations in transport and the flow field in the Faroe–Shetland Channel, Polar Research 27 (1), 7-22. Sherwin, T.J., Williams, M.O., Turrell, W.R., Hughes, S.L., Miller, P.I., 2006. A description and analysis of mesoscale variability in the Faroe-Shetland Channel. JGR 111, ISI:000235995000002 (C3).

  2. NSDW + MNAW NAW Bathymetry of the Faroe – Shetland Channel

  3. THE PROBLEM OF MESOSCALE VARIABILITY

  4. B C D E Velocities and transport in the NAW at 4 ADCPs Sv Hughes et al., (2006) cm/s From different methodologies: Hughes et al., (2006) mean NAW transport = 4.0 Sv (trend ~ -0.1 Sv per annum) Sherwin et al,. (2008) mean NAW transport = 3.5 Sv±0.1 Sv (2.1 Sv barotropic, 1.4 Sv baroclinic)

  5. 0423 h 19 May 1999

  6. 23 233 359 397 209 Surface drifter and ADCP EKE (cm2 /s2)

  7. SEASONAL VARIATION IN THE MEAN FLOW

  8. 2.0 Sv 5.3 Sv 3.8 Sv Mean surface drifter velocities (6000 days of data)

  9. Monthly mean velocities in the upper 500 m

  10. Correlation between monthly mean transport in the upper 500 and SW wind stress from NCAR/NCEP 4.1 Sv 2.3 Sv

  11. BAROCLINIC / BAROTROPIC BREAKDOWN

  12. 15 June 1997, Qgeo = 0.33 Sv 12 September 1999, Qgeo = 1.7 Sv MNAW NAW Examples of strong and weak geostrophic transport (from CTD sections)

  13. Mean ADCP Geostrophic Mode 1 Mean and mode 1 transports across the FSC

  14. HOW THOR IS ADDRESSING BOTH PROBLEMS (mesoscale variability and the shelf edge)

  15. In THOR we add 2 extra ADCPs

  16. Trawl proof frame for shallow mooring

  17. SUMMARY • Contrary to earlier shorter term analysis there does appear to be a seasonal variation in the transport of NAW of ~ 1.8 Sv (± 50%) • Identified some difficulties that limit the accuracy of absolute mean transport • Large mesoscale variability makes it difficult to determine means and trends with this configuration • After 15 years of observation it is difficult to argue for a relocation of the moorings

More Related