1 / 16

Representation at Workshop

Representation at Workshop. 93 registrants 14 countries About 50 institutes Request from participants to provide list of these institutes. Here it comes…. All talks online at conference web site:. https://indico.cern.ch/conferenceTimeTable.py?confId=115336# all.detailed. Institutes I.

linh
Download Presentation

Representation at Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Representation at Workshop • 93 registrants • 14 countries • About 50 institutes • Request from participants to provide list of these institutes. Here it comes… All talks online at conference web site: https://indico.cern.ch/conferenceTimeTable.py?confId=115336#all.detailed R. Assmann

  2. Institutes I R. Assmann

  3. Institutes II R. Assmann

  4. Institutes III R. Assmann

  5. Sessions: European and Global Goals, Organization, Ahead • Draft mandate • Milestones • Organization R. Assmann

  6. Draft Mandate/Mission I • Develop goals from photon science and particle physics for advanced e-beam accelerators, including timeline. 5y, 10y, 20y goals and perspectives. • Describe coherent program for research on novel e-beam accelerators. What are the main components of this program? • Define reference measurements to qualify facilities for photon science and/or particle physics, including definition of standards. • Produce white-paper summarizing European efforts/goals with comments on world efforts. R. Assmann

  7. Draft Mandate/Mission II • Create framework for open facilities. EuroNNActo describe and further develop coherent network of test facilities, document capabilities, review requests, discuss work share. “Distributed accelerator test facility for synchrotron science and particle physics” • Each facility to propose its main speciality(1-2) on what they want to offer for collaboration. • Ask FP7/8 support for such a “distributed open test facility”, including support for beam/laser time for users. Use also LaserLab opportunities. R. Assmann

  8. Draft Mandate/Mission III • Foster transfer of technology between communities and with industry. • Propose adequate funding mechanisms to support university-based accelerator research with long-term scientific benefits. • Creation of a “European School: From Conventional to Novel Accelerators”, linked to CAS or other series. • Support training of students and specialists. • Organize a European Advanced Accelerator Conference every second year. R. Assmann

  9. Draft Mandate/Mission III • Vision on the time-scale of one or few centralized “big” facilities, beyond present projects. • From “distributed test facility” to a “pilot e-beam facility”. • Pilot facility runs 24h 7/7 to produce agreed e-beam. • What does “big” mean? Beam parameters? How many? • How to split beam time for synchrotron radiation, medical applications and High Energy Physics applications? • Prepare significant FP8 proposal for pilot facility(ies), beyond present projects. Time scale? • Foster inter-disciplinary work on theory and simulations. R. Assmann

  10. Complementarity • Must avoid reinventing the wheel… • Existing ICFA/ICUIL task force (only laser-driven): • Report by WimLeemans (chairman). Wim confirmed that the proposed EuroNNAc will indeed complement the task force work. • ELI project (5 years, ~0.8 BEuro): • Reports by G. Korn and W. Sandner. • Again, complementarity confirmed. R. Assmann

  11. Draft Collection Goals • What are the top goals of the field (10y ahead)? • Demonstrate working plasma-based FEL at realistic frequencies • Reliable 24/7 operation of plasma-based accelerators at 1 GeV • Staging • High beam quality at 10 GeVfrom plasma accelerators • GV/m positron acceleration with plasma devices while preserving emittance • Demonstrate proton drivers for wake acceleration

  12. “New” idea to be evaluated… • Compact test beam for particle detectors and other uses based on novel acceleration scheme (brought into discussion by R. Aleksan). • Once shown, device could be copied and used as compact test beam at many places. Distributed use… • Use two units to collide two e-beams at GeV energies. Final demonstration of stability. R. Assmann

  13. Work package list(WP leaders will form steering committee) • Network coordination • Goals (from photon science and particle physics) • Program (for research on novel e-beam accelerators) • Reference measurements and standards • Distributed accelerator research test facility (short-term) • Pilot e-beam facility (longer-term) • Transfer of technology (includes industry) • Inter-disciplinary theory and simulation • Funding mechanisms (university-based accelerator research) • European Advanced Accelerator Conference • European School: From Conventional to Novel Accelerators (CAS) • Training (student programs) • Funding requests (FP7/8, …) • Writing (white paper, outreach, documentation) R. Assmann

  14. Organization • Invitation letter from EuroNNAcafter the meeting. To European and interested world labs. • Respond with letter of interest from institutes. Includes person for governing board. • Coordination: continue (EuCARD) for next 2 years. • Governing board: 1 representative per institute. • Steering committee (10-12): Formed based on WP list, proposed by coordinators, elected by governing board. R. Assmann

  15. Milestones • Jun 2011 EuroNNAc2 proposal to continue 2013-2017. • Jun 2011 First proposals for EuCARD2/ANAC2. • Jul 2011 Invitation letters • Sep 2011 Deadline letter of interest. Proposals for WP and governing board. • Sep 2011 Final EuroNNAc2/ANAC2 proposals. Trans-national access could be included. • Jan 2012 White paper, drafted by coordinators, commented/completed by e-mail, … Distributed to labs, ICFA, European Strategy Group for HEP, … • Apr 2012 EuroNNAc2012. Form distributed test facility. • May 2012 List of key facilities to TIARA. R. Assmann

  16. EuroNNAc2 Proposal • By coordinators • Plus volunteers (not exclusive, propose anything you would like to contribute or to co-write). R. Assmann

More Related