250 likes | 1.29k Views
Daikin VRV III vs LG MULTI V Plus II. LG. Daikin. Symbol. Description. Max. Piping length. 200. 165. a + b + c. (Equivalent). 225. 190. Max. piping length. 40. 40. b + c. between 1. branch to each IDU. st. 90. 90. (Optional condition, Refer to PDB). Max. piping length. 10.
E N D
LG Daikin Symbol Description Max. Piping length 200 165 a + b + c (Equivalent) 225 190 Max. piping length 40 40 b + c between 1 branch to each IDU st 90 90 (Optional condition, Refer to PDB) Max. piping length 10 10 a + f between 1 Branch & ODU st Max. Height difference 100 50 (IF ODU is upper position than IDU) H between ODU & IDU 100 90 (IF IDU is upper position than ODU) Max. Height difference 5 5 H between ODU & ODU 1 Max. Height difference 15 15 H between IDU & IDU 2 300 300 (IF length between 1 st branch to each IDU 40m) ≤ Total Piping length a + b + c + d + e 1000 1000 (IF length between 1 st branch to each IDU >40m) 1. Design Flexibility/ Piping length & height LG MULTI V PLUS II has world top level on Max. piping length(225m), Max. Height difference(100m) between ODU & IDU. Schematic diagram Table Fig. The product design flexibility comparison between LG & Daikin
2. Inverter vs Constant Ratio Inverter ratio of LG MULTI V Plus II is better than Daikin. Inverter compressor motor output : 1.4kW Ave 44% Constant compressor motor output : 4.5kW*2 Daikin Inverter compressor motor output : 5.4kW Ave 65% Constant compressor motor output : 6.7kW LG
Appendix. COP comparison with VRV III <Heating Operation> <Cooling Operation> * TC: Total Capacity [kW] * PI: Power Input [kW] (Comp + Outdoor fan motor)
Appendix. Design Flexibility / Piping length & height ■ Compressor capacity Comparison ■ Heat Exchanger Area Comparison
103m Appendix. Design limit of MULTI V PLUS II Outdoor units MULTI V Plus II 110m ON ON ON Indoor units <DA Research Lab in Korea>