1 / 21

Accompanying Measure in System Dependability

Accompanying Measure in System Dependability. FP5.8 KAII Roadmapping project June 2002 - May 2003. Partners. Univ. Newcastle Co-ordinator Adelard Overall roadmap ARC Seibersdorf DES Roadmap & workshop CNUCE/ISTI - Univ. Pisa Partner JRC Workshops CNRS/LAAS Partner. Objectives.

livi
Download Presentation

Accompanying Measure in System Dependability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Accompanying Measure in System Dependability FP5.8 KAII Roadmapping project June 2002 - May 2003

  2. Partners Univ. Newcastle Co-ordinator Adelard Overall roadmap ARC Seibersdorf DES Roadmap & workshop CNUCE/ISTI - Univ. Pisa Partner JRC Workshops CNRS/LAAS Partner Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  3. Objectives • Overall Dependability Roadmap • consult and synthesize from other roadmapping workshops • Dependable Embedded System Roadmap • Constituency and Consensus-Building, for • ISDI (Information Society Dependability Initiative) Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  4. AMSD Positioning DDSIDependability policy support AMSD Overall dependability AMSD dependable embedded systems ARTIST advncd. RT BVNbiometrics PAMPASmobileprivacy &security ACIPcritical infrastruct.protection STORKcrypto RAPIDprivacy/IdentityMgmt RESETsmartcards Others….. Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  5. Achieving Dependable Systems • The subject of System Dependability needs to be treated holistically, to: • cover all potentially relevant dependability attributes, since a balance is invariably needed • allow for all types of faults — e.g. intermittent h/w faults, s/w specification and design faults, human-machine interaction faults including intrusions • make use of all major means for achieving dependability means (rigorous design, fault tolerance, verification and validation, system evaluation) • cope with dependability threats (fault/error/failure) “chains” between systems, via system interaction, composition and creation • overcome various linguistic and cultural divides (e.g. dependability/ security/survivability/trustworthiness) - without necessarily imposing a common culture and terminology Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  6. Overall Dependability Roadmap • Aims to cover both technical and socio-technical issues, and a broad range of systems. • Material from all the more-focussed road-maps will be consolidated, so as to identify commonalities, tensions, and contradictions (as well as opportunities for synergy) • This will use the taxonomies and classifications of dependability developed by IFIP WG 10.4 (Dependability and Fault Tolerance) as the conceptual framework Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  7. Target domains Autonomic, self healing systems Biometrics Consumer, network enabled devices Cryptography Critical systems Fault Tolerance Dependable Embedded Systems Early Warning and Information Sharing Evidence/Forensics Human Factors Interdependencies (technological and sociological) IT & Law (European and International) Large scale bounded systems (enterprise) Large scale unbounded (infrastructure) Middleware for critical systems Mobile computing, Grid, P2P Nanotechnology Privacy and Identity Management Reliability, etc. Safety Smart Cards Survivability Trust in e-Business Security Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  8. Dependable Embedded System Roadmap • application assessment (analysis of the different application domains) • technology assessment (study of the available performance and cost predictions of the enabling technologies, namely semiconductors, communications, dependability, and real-time system and software development) • analysis of the resulting technology/application matrix to identify which fields particularly merit further work, leading to • establishment of a research agenda Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  9. Roadmap progress and plans DES Roadmap Jul 02 Initial working doc (structure & method) Nov/Dec Draft roadmap Feb 03 Final roadmap May Final report Overall Roadmap Sep 02 Elicitation framework Oct Strawman roadmap Dec Draft roadmap (full distribution) Jan03 Consultation Mar Final roadmap May Final report Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  10. Workshops • R&D in Information Infrastructure and Dependability • Sept 19-20, Brussels (with DDSI, ACIP) • Dependable Embedded Systems • Oct 3, Grenoble (with ARTIST) • Privacy and Identity Management • Oct 17-18, Zurich (with RAPID) • Trust and Security in e-business Processes • Dec 5-6, Brussels (with PAMPAS, RESET) • AMSD cross-sector workshop - Feb 2003 • Feb 2003 (with other roadmaps - technology & applications) Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  11. Roadmap - proposed outline • Introduction • Method of working • Vision – user centred • Vision – sector and technology based • Synthesis and discussion • Conclusions • Glossary, acronyms • Bibiliography • Appendices Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  12. Method of working • workshops and other RoadMaps • interviews/consultation • analysis and scenario development of FP6 CEC documentation (ISTAG, eEurope etc) • appraisal of external Roadmaps (e.g. EWICS, software engineering, dist computing SOTA ...) • AMSD and other workshop outputs • appraisal of FP5.8 Roadmaps and Embedded Systems one (draft due month 5) • support for DeFINE and DeSIRE • AMSD cross-sector workshop - Jan 2003 Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  13. Vision – user centred • Based on user scenarios from ISTAG and the AMI visions. • Analysis using conventional dependability notions augmented with concepts from: •home technology (other important dependability attributes like “fun”, “friendliness”, “flexibility”) •ethnographic insights from grid/group analysis • This may lead to an abstract description of middleware including abstract services, architecture and attributes. • Dependability discussion/mapping against technology & sector from other roadmaps Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  14. Vision – sector and technology based This is the vision coming from the various workshops and sector based activities. We would expect an outline of: •market and application drivers •technology drivers •existing landscape •summary of 2010 vision and landscape Progress issues: availability of other (draft) Road maps Due: ? Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  15. Synthesis • This would include: • the dependability vision • some unified view of the sector and technology based landscapes – trends, barriers, strategies • what 2010 might look like (and further afield) • how to get there • may be supporting SWOT analysis • Take ERA into account Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  16. ISDI • Ideally, the coherent dependability initiative in FWP6, encompassing a full range of dependability-related activities, e.g. • R&D, and tools/methods etc. on the various aspects of dependability per se, (reliability, safety, security, survivability, etc.); • education and training; and • means for encouraging and enabling sector-specific (IST) R&D projects to use dependability best practice. • A core IP (DeSIRE) and NoE (DeFINE), linked through cooperation and overlapping workpackages to other IPs, NoEs (& traditional instruments) with dependability concerns Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  17. International Working Conference • March 2003 • Promote inter-community working • Industry, government, academia, policy • EU + accession states • (Some) US, Australia, NZ,... • Establish broad dependability consensus • working towards a cross-sector dependability culture • Gain political support for ISDI Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  18. AMSD Advisory Board Prof. Martyn Thomas - Independent Consultant (UK) - Chairman Daniel Bois, Senior Vice President of Corporate R&D, Gemplus International (F) Guy Carrere, Director of Research, France Telecom R&D (F) Wolfgang Merker, Vice-President, Research Information and Communication, DaimlerChrysler AG (D) Dr Sergio Montenegro, Manager for Embedded and Dependable Systems, GMD Fraunhofer - Institute for Computer Architecture and Software Technology (A) Dr. Michele Morganti, Director Strategic Planning, Siemens (I) VD Dipl.-Ing. Reinhard Petschacher, CTO, Infineon Technologies (A) Gérard Roucairol, Vice-President for Research and Development, Bull (F) Dr. Rob Witty, Chief Technical and Programmes Officer, National Air Traffic Services (UK) Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  19. AMSD Technical Board • Senior technical representatives • industry, academia, government, policy • Advice on overall position, and specific technical expertise • Direct consultation • Review of materials produced • Attendance at workshops • > 45 members, by invitation Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  20. AMSD Affiliates • Broad representation • Cross community • Open to all • Review of published/draft materials • >100 members Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

  21. Contacts • Coordinator - Newcastle University • <Tom.Anderson@ncl.ac.uk> (Scientific) • <Jon.Warwick@ncl.ac.uk> (Admin) • Overall roadmap - Adelard (and apps workshop) • George.Cleland@adelard.com • DES roadmap & workshop - ARCS • Erwin.Schoitsch@arcs.ac.at • Workshops - JRC • Marc.Wilikens@jrc.it (Trust in e-Business, Privacy) • Marcelo.Masera@jrc.it (Critical Infrastructure) www.am-sd.org Adelard ARCS CNUCE JRC LAAS Newcastle Univ

More Related