1 / 25

Effects of Cabin Crew Location and Passenger Motivation on Aircraft Evacuations

Effects of Cabin Crew Location and Passenger Motivation on Aircraft Evacuations. Mark H. George Cynthia L. Corbett. Research Questions. Which cabin crewmember locations and procedures produce the fastest passenger evacuations through a Type III exit?

lloyd
Download Presentation

Effects of Cabin Crew Location and Passenger Motivation on Aircraft Evacuations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Effects of Cabin Crew Location and Passenger Motivation on Aircraft Evacuations Mark H. George Cynthia L. Corbett

  2. Research Questions • Which cabin crewmember locations and procedures produce the fastest passenger evacuations through a Type III exit? • Can inefficient passenger behaviors be mitigated by the activities of a crewmember?

  3. Factors Directing the Research Questions • Exits in the middle of the cabin tend to be more usable in accidents • Crewmembers receive training in the safe operation of Type III Exits • Crewmembers are often not seated in the Type III exit area, even if it is their primary exit • Varying airline procedures • Variable passenger behavior reported in evacuations

  4. Crewmember Locations • One row forward of exit (condition A) • Back of cabin - actively moving through queue of passengers (condition B) • Back of cabin - performing evacuation from behind the queue of passengers (condition C) • No crewmember participation (condition D)

  5. Subject Motivation • Group 1 - No monetary incentive • Group 2 - $ 50.00 bonus paid to the first 25% of subjects to get out of the simulator (averaged across 5 trials)

  6. Hypotheses • A crewmember in the exit area would provide the fastest evacuation rates • In high motivation groups, a crewmember at the exit would be able to sort out inefficient subject behaviors

  7. Methods • Subjects • 12 groups of 50 (actual: 46 - 50) • 18 - 62 years old • Male/female ratio roughly equal • Good physical condition • Unremarkable personality profiles (NEO Personality Inventory)

  8. Methods • Design • 2 (motivation) x 3 (location) repeated measures • Counterbalanced across “location” variable • 6 trial orders

  9. Trial Orders Trial Trial Trial Trial Trial 1 2 3 4 5 Group 1 D A B C D 2 D A C B D 3 D B A C D 4 D B C A D 5 D C A B D 6 D C B A D

  10. Methods • Apparatus • Narrow-body aircraft simulator • Triple seat assemblies • Single Type III exit • F/A jumpseat ~ 25 feet aft of exit centerline • Trials started by buzzer • Trials recorded on videotape with time code superimposed on tape

  11. Cabin Crewmember • ~ 35 years old • Physically fit • Aurally compelling • Procedurally competent • Highly motivated

  12. Results • Based on individual exit negotiation times, defined as: the interval of time between when a subject fully cleared the Type III exit until the next subject fully cleared the exit

  13. Crewmember Impedance • Time taken for the crewmember to reach the exit area (condition B): • Non-incentive trials: 13.31 seconds • Incentive trials: 25.60 seconds

  14. Conclusions • Crewmember one row forward of the exit provides the fastest evacuation • Did not get significantly different evacuation rates with monetary incentives • Different crewmember/behaviors may produce different results • Repeated-measures designs may be unsuitable for evacuation experiments

More Related