280 likes | 389 Views
NOAA/ESRL Carbon Cycle Group aircraft profile measurements – Non CO 2 gases.
E N D
NOAA/ESRL Carbon Cycle Group aircraft profile measurements – Non CO2 gases C. Sweeney1, A. Karion, D.W.Guenther1, S. E. Wolter1, D. Neff1, P.M. Lang2, M.J. Heller1, T. Conway2, E.J. Dlugokencky2, P. Novelli2, L. Bruhwiler2, A. Hirsch1, A. Jacobson1, J. Miller1 G. Petron1, S. Montzka2 and K.A. Masarie2 1CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 2NOAA/ESRL, Boulder, CO
SF6 CO Aircraft Data CO2 CH4 N2O
Making Annual Climatology Making an Annual Climatology Original data Original data – detrended
West East Transect THD CAR HAA NHA OIL • West coast sites lagged by one month • West coast show well mixed throughout column relative to east coast
The Arctic Footprint Free Troposphere Boundary Layer Courtesy of Adam Hirsch
Arctic CO2/CH4 Correlation Residual of profile means show extremely good correlations in Arctic.
Boundary Layer Enhancementof CH4 Free Troposphere CMA NHA SCA HAA Boundary Layer • Significant enhancement in the boundary layer suggesting a year round flux
Midwest enhancement of N2O Midwest Sites CAR THD NHA • Significant enhancement of N2O in boundary layer in croplands of the Midwestern US Courtesy of Eric Kort (GEIA N2O fluxes)
PFA Arctic CO2/CO Correlation Residual s of profile means for CO2 and CO correlates well suggesting that large scale transport is driving winter time high.
Boundary layer CO OIL NHA Free Troposphere CAR HAA OIL NHA CAR Boundary Layer HAA
N2O CO2 SF6 CO NHA HFM
Kriging interpolation –850 mbar Crovoisier et al., in review
Direct Carbon Budgeting Approach Exchanges with the upper atmosphere (convection, advection) Convection Edges Volume h Out Surface CO2 fluxes (Fsurf) Crovoisier et al., 2006 ? Observations aircrafts + towers.
Forward Model Surface flux (f)acting on transport (A) Concentration Inverse Model Background Measurement Regression of data c onto basis set A.
Forward Model Foot print – one month Flux prior (GEIA) Courtesy of Eric Kort A Transport f Flux C’ Concentration anomally =
Foot print – one month Flux prior (GEIA) Courtesy of Eric Kort Flux [CH4] Particle concentration (BL) F1 F2 FN Obs. (Flasks/profiles) C’ Fp A I = Regions Regions Regions
Inversion Model for aircraft profiles using a LPDM Advantage: Monthly fluxes for each region Ability to use sparse measurement field by treating each profile as an independent observation assuming that monthly fluxes have not changed over the last 5 years. Evaluate spatial distribution of fluxes (region to region) Disadvantage Requires a background concentration It will be tricky to define regions that are truly independent. Number of regions will be limited by the limited number of profiles per month (10 profiles x 18 sites)
Conclusions • The last 5 years of aircraft profiles not only tell us about transport but suggest distribution of many sources/sinks for CO2, CO, SF6, N2O and CH4. • The aircraft profiles offer an independent estimate of regional scale fluxes. • This is a new dataset which needs to be exercised by good science!