710 likes | 724 Views
This presentation discusses the observations of parallel electric fields in space by Cluster satellites inside the auroral zone at altitudes above the main acceleration region. The Master Thesis by Erik Bergman covers topics such as handling the data, selection strategy, results, instrumental effects, and conclusions.
E N D
Parallel electric fields in space Observations by Cluster satellites inside the auroral zone at altitudes above the main acceleration region Presentation of Master Thesis by Erik Bergman Dept.: Astronomy and Space Physics Instructor: Andris Vaivads Examiner: Annika Olsson
Introduction Handling the data Selection strategy Results Instrumental effects Conclusions Contents
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Discrete auroras Auroral oval Potential models Predictions of U andO-potentials EFW instrument Introduction
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Discrete auroras • Discrete auroral arcs: • Caused by electrons accelerated by parallelE-fields usually at 1-2 RE • North-South, 100 m – 80 km, typically 5 km • Mapped to Cluster altitude (~4.5 RE) this equals 50 km • At Cluster speed (~5 km/s) the size of parallel E-fields would be ~10 seconds
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Potential models
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Predictions of U and O-pot perp para 10 s Northern hemisphere
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Four identical probes Voltage mode, to measure electric fields, only in spinplane Current mode, to measure density and temperature of plasma Electric Field and Wave experiment
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Coordinate systems Calculations and assumptions Filtering Handling the data
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Coordinate systems
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Calculations and assumptions
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Filtering
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Orbits Quicklook plots Overview plots Catagories Selection strategy
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Orbits o o Middle of March
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Quicklook Plot
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Overview Plot
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Catagories • 500 zero crossings (Jan-May, 2001-2002) • 57 events selected for closer inspection • Divided into four sub catagories • 16 – No activity • 23 – No perpendicular activity • 5 – Too active • 13 – Good events • 5 events selected from the good
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Parallel DC electric fields Double layers and solitary waves Waves Results
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Parallel DC electric fields
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Parallel DC electric fields All electric fields are upwards
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Double layers and solitary waves
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Accompanied by a decrease in plasma density DL and SW theory
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Waves
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Wake effects Physical Potential Offsets Interference from WHISPER Instrumental effects
Contents Introduction Handle data Sel. Strategy Results Instr. effects Conlusions Possible interpretations of the results Upward ~1 mV/m parallel E-fields Too small, could be instrumental effects Could be U associated (not likely at this altitude) Could be lower part of O U on top of O (not probable) Lack of downward parallel E-fields Cluster measure above O, too high altitude Downward fields associated with O should be ~0.1 mV/m at this altitude, i.e. not measurable Conclusions
Thank you for listening The End
DC LIST SW LIST BACK
DC LIST SW LIST UP BACK
DC LIST SW LIST UP BACK
DC LIST SW LIST BACK
DC LIST SW LIST BACK
DC LIST SW LIST BACK
DC LIST SW LIST UP BACK
DC LIST SW LIST UP BACK
DC LIST SW LIST UP BACK
DC LIST SW LIST UP BACK
DC LIST SW LIST UP BACK
DC LIST SW LIST UP BACK
DC LIST SW LIST UP BACK
DC LIST SW LIST UP BACK
DC LIST SW LIST UP BACK
DC LIST SW LIST UP BACK
DC LIST SW LIST UP BACK
DC LIST SW LIST UP BACK
DC LIST SW LIST UP BACK
DC LIST SW LIST UP BACK
DC LIST SW LIST UP BACK
DC LIST SW LIST UP BACK