1 / 33

CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION TRIAL PROCEDURES

CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION TRIAL PROCEDURES. KEY TO A SUCCESSFUL TRIAL. preparation!. TRIAL ASSIGNMENT. State court direct calendar systems and Federal court: case is initially assigned to trial judge. TRIAL ASSIGNMENT. State court master calendar systems:

london
Download Presentation

CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION TRIAL PROCEDURES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CALIFORNIACIVILLITIGATIONTRIAL PROCEDURES © 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

  2. KEY TO A SUCCESSFUL TRIAL preparation!

  3. TRIAL ASSIGNMENT State court direct calendar systems and Federal court: case is initially assigned to trial judge

  4. TRIAL ASSIGNMENT State court master calendar systems: case is assigned to trial by presiding judge on the day set for trial

  5. CHALLENGING THE TRIAL JUDGE State Court Any trial judge can be challenged for cause (actual bias) Parties have one peremptory challenge to a judge during the case (unspecified reasons)

  6. CHALLENGE FOR CAUSE State Court • Rarely done • Requires showing of actual bias • Delays trial until determined

  7. PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE State Court • Often done • Requires declaration of fear of unfairness • Effective if timely

  8. TIMING OF PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE Master calendar system: before counsel leaves for trial department Direct calendar system: within 15 days of first appearance

  9. RECUSAL— any judge may recuse himself from handling a case for actual bias or appearance of impropriety.

  10. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE Agenda: • Trial briefs • Proposed voir dire • Motions in limine • Exhibit and witness lists • Proposed statement of the case • Proposed jury instructions

  11. MASTER CALENDAR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE trial date is first day judge has seen the case, trial documents exchanged

  12. DIRECT CALENDAR/FEDERAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE trial judge already familiar with case, trial documents exchanged before trial date

  13. TRIAL BRIEF— summarizes facts and law that will be presented at the trial, educates judge about issues of the case.

  14. PROPOSED VOIR DIRE— parties submit lists of questions for judge and counsel to ask the jury.

  15. MOTIONS IN LIMINE Motions to • exclude certain evidence as improper, or unduly prejudicial or confusing • include evidence where legal dispute anticipated

  16. EXHIBIT LISTS Most courts require a list of exhibits, and exhibits must be premarked for presentation in trial.

  17. WITNESS LISTS— to read to prospective jurors so those who know witnesses can be excused.

  18. STATEMENT OF THE CASE— brief, objective statement of nature of the case read to prospective jurors by judge.

  19. PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS Statements of the law • to be read to the jury at end of case • most important trial effort • frames the presentation of the case

  20. JURY SELECTION • Each side challenges jurors for cause • Each side uses peremptory challenges • When all challenges are used or each side passes, jury is sworn

  21. OPENING STATEMENT • Plaintiff presentation of what the evidence will show • Defendant can make opening, or reserve until after plaintiff rests

  22. PLAINTIFF’S CASE-IN-CHIEF Plaintiff presents witnesses on direct examination Defendant presents cross-examination of witnesses using leading questions

  23. PLAINTIFF RESTS— when plaintiff has presented all testimony and evidence.

  24. MOTION FOR DIRECTED VERDICT— defendant moves to dismiss on grounds plaintiff has failed to offer evidence to support claims—rarely granted.

  25. DEFENDANT’S CASE-IN-CHIEF Defendant presents witnesses on direct examination Plaintiff presents cross-examination of witnesses using leading questions

  26. REBUTTAL— each side presents responsive evidence until they are both done.

  27. CLOSING ARGUMENTS Plaintiff argues favorable evidence and law Defendant argues favorable evidence and law, and attacks plaintiff argument Plaintiff argues to rebut defendant’s arguments

  28. JURY INSTRUCTIONS— some judges “pre-instruct” before closing arguments, others read them to jury after arguments completed.

  29. JURY • Is given the case • Deliberates • May ask questions • Returns with verdict

  30. POLLING THE JURY • Losing party may request • Each juror asked if he agrees with verdict • May suggest grounds for post-trial motions, appeal

  31. TRIAL ENDS • Jury excused • Judgment prepared • Judgment entered

  32. TRIAL ENDS But the case is far from over…

  33. SUMMARYOrder of Trial Presentation PREVIEW Judgments, Post-Trial Motions

More Related