290 likes | 518 Views
Study Goal. This is a case-controlled descriptive study of 40 subjects with PG on their socio-demographic profile, co-morbidity and personality profile. Method. Matched Case-Control DesignSubjects were screened using the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)Participants scored more than 5 on SOGSPar
E N D
1. Socio-demographic Profile and Psychiatric Co-morbidity of Subjects with Pathological Gambling Dr R. M. Winslow
Head, CAMP
Community Addictions Management Programme
Institute of Mental Health
2. Study Goal This is a case-controlled descriptive study of 40 subjects with PG on their socio-demographic profile, co-morbidity and personality profile
3. Method Matched Case-Control Design
Subjects were screened using the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)
Participants scored more than 5 on SOGS
Participants diagnosed to have PG using DSM-IV
Control Group
Matching criteria
Age (+/- 1 year)
Gender
4. Method Instruments
Structured Questionnaire on Sociodemographic Data
Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-Auto)
Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDQ)
Axis II Diagnoses
Eysenck Personality Inventory
Impulsivity
5. Results & Discussion
9. Discussion Typical profile of our sample’s pathological gambler
38 year old married man
Tertiary education & employed
Started gambling at age 20
Lottery (4D) as most preferred form of gambling
11. Discussion High rates of comorbid substance use & mood disorders were confirmed in this sample
Controls
Only 22.5% were diagnosed with a DSM-IV criteria for a lifetime disorder
12. Discussion Most common lifetime disorders
Mood disorders
Substance Use Disorders
Anxiety Disorders
Similar to Black & Moyer (1998) and Petry et al (2005)
Black and Moyer reported that 90% of their sample of pathological gamblers suffered from a lifetime disorder
Petry et al found 49.6% and 41.3% of pathological gamblers with mood and anxiety disorders respectively
However, our study found higher rates of anxiety disorders whereas the above 2 studies found higher rates of mood disorders
13. Discussion Rates of anxiety, depression & substance use were significantly higher in pathological gamblers compared to controls
Rate of substance abuse disorders is low in Singapore among pathological gamblers compared to the West
14. Discussion Onset of gambling predated onset of substance abuse in all cases
Onset of gambling preceded onset of depression in most cases
Implication
2 types of gamblers
Gambling leading to depression
Gambling as a means of coping with depression
16. Discussion Most common Personality Disorders in our study
Obsessive-compulsive
Avoidant
Paranoid
17. Discussion Impulsivity
Pathological gamblers scored significantly higher than the controls on the impulsivity questionnaire (16.8 ± 4.7 and 11.3 ± 4.2 respectively)
Range of Impulsivity – 0 to 31
19. Limitations Self-selected group of participants
Cross-sectional Design
Aetiological implications are unclear
20. Thank You
21. Introduction Definition of Gambling
A wager of any type of item or possession of value upon a game or event of uncertain outcome in which chance, of a variable degree, determines the outcome (Bolen & Boyd, 1968)
22. Pathological Gambling Characterized by
Failure to resist impulse to gamble despite disruption to personal, family & vocational life
Associated with
Adverse consequences for the person & family & society at large
23. Pathological Gambling Pathological Gambling as an addiction
(Potenza, 2001)
Pathological Gambling as an obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorder
(Blaszczynski, 1999)
24. Prevalence of Pathological Gambling United States & Canada
0.4% - 2.0%
(Welte et al, 2002; Cunningham-Williams & Cottler, 2001)
Asian Countries
1.0% - 2.0%
(Lee et al, 1990; Wong & So, 2003)
Singapore (MCYS, 2005)
58% of Singapore residents aged 18 & above have taken part in some form of gambling activity over a 1-year period
2.1% reported symptoms that suggest probable pathological gambling
Comparable to results of similar studies in HKG & Macau
25. Co-morbidity with Pathological Gambling Affective Disorders
33.3% of pathological gamblers have an affective disorder compared to 14.2% in non-gamblers (Bland et al, 1993)
Major depression significantly more prevalent in problem gamblers (8.8%) than non-gamblers (5.2%)
Among patients who engage in gambling, secondary depressive symptoms are very common (Thorson et al, 1994; Becona et al, 1996)
26. Co-morbidity with Pathological Gambling Anxiety Disorders
Pathological gamblers significantly more likely than non-gamblers to have any anxiety disorder and agoraphobia (Bland et al, 1993)
High rates of prevalence of anxiety disorders among respondents with pathological gambling (Petry et al, 2005)
27. Co-morbidity with Pathological Gambling Impulse Control Disorders
22.9% of study subjects (pathological gambling) displayed compulsive shopping or compulsive sexual activity
Patients also reported more severe gambling symptoms
Grant & Kim, 2003
28. Co-morbidity with Pathological Gambling Personality Disorders
Positive association between PG & ASPD (Slutske et al, 2001; Cunningham-Williams et al, 1998)
87% of subjects with PG met criteria for at least one PD
Most frequent – obsessive-compulsive, avoidant, & schizoid PD
Number of PD positively related to the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) score (Blaszczynski & Steel, 1998)
29. Co-morbidity with Pathological Gambling Substance Use Disorders
Toneatto et al (2002) in a study of gamblers
55.4% using alcohol
10.1% using drugs
Welte et al (2001)
Extremely strong relationship between current alcohol dependence & current PG (OR = 23.1)
Drinking increased with gambling severity
Petry et al (2005)
Alcohol dependence, drug use disorder & tobacco dependence are significantly related to PG