1 / 13

Research Presentation Topic: Governance or Greed

Research Presentation Topic: Governance or Greed. by Jillian Marsh, PhD Candidate Adelaide University DKCRC Scholarship recipient. Thesis title.

lonna
Download Presentation

Research Presentation Topic: Governance or Greed

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Research PresentationTopic: Governance or Greed by Jillian Marsh, PhD Candidate Adelaide University DKCRC Scholarship recipient

  2. Thesis title A critical analysis of the decision-making protocols used in approving a commercial mining license for Beverley Uranium Mine in Adnyamathanha country: toward effective Indigenous participation in caring for cultural resources

  3. VadaArdlanhaor Paralana Hot Spring … land of our spirit ancestor Virdnimuranhabut the land is not always thiscalm …

  4. Indigenous research ethics • National protocols and guidelines can be found on these websites: AIATSIS, AHC, NHMRC • University standards: Human Research Ethics Committees • Individual standards: what do YOU think is important • Community expectations/requirements

  5. Case study units of analysis • Adnyamathanha decision-making • Remote governance • Capacity building • Decolonisation • Beverley EIA • Experiences and values • Best practice

  6. Research Dilemmas • Participatory approach • Position of researcher • Ethical guidelines and practices • Various institutional requirements

  7. Key Findings • Lack of independent resources for communities; • Representative model at odds with Indigenous protocols of discussion and decision-making; • Poor cross cultural communication; limited guidelines for ‘best practice’; • Narrow interpretation of legislation offers no Indigenous decision making power; • Inefficient administration of legislation; • Colonisation of mineral resources eg. corporate focus within EIA procedure; inequitable distribution of work resources;

  8. Recommendations Philosophy & Practice of Good Governance • Indigenous philosophies of governance • Self-determination and capacity building • Culturally appropriate communication • Inclusive consultation/negotiation

  9. Who Benefits most from Research? • Improved institutional standards and guidelines – University, industry, govt • Greater empowerment and control over development within community • Add to academic body of knowledge • Creating space for our future generations

  10. Closing PhD thesis due for submission Dec 08; Appalling statistics for Indigenous PhD graduates; Acknowledgement of DKCRC support;

  11. Yura Yakarti – the future

More Related