1 / 17

Am I Me or Am I the Situation?

Am I Me or Am I the Situation?. Does Personality Change?. Foundation of personality psychology is personality stability and predictive utility If personality changes this threatens the field’s usefulness Especially if change is random Prediction difficult

loren
Download Presentation

Am I Me or Am I the Situation?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Am I Me or Am I the Situation?

  2. Does Personality Change? • Foundation of personality psychology is personality stability and predictive utility • If personality changes this threatens the field’s usefulness • Especially if change is random • Prediction difficult • Central debate has been whether personality or situation better predictor

  3. Person or Situation? • Account for 2 observations: • Behavior varies across situation • Perceive ourselves as the same person • Are we different people in different situations? • Historical emphasis on one or the other • Internal or external • Implications for methodology, Qs, etc.

  4. Person-Situation Debate • Either Or Question • 1940s, 1950s internal emphasis • Freudian personality types (anal character) • Projective techniques and trait inventories

  5. Mischel (1968) challenge • Dissatisfied with internal emphasis on traits • Argued for situational focus • Situational changes predict behavior > traits • Ostensive personality consistency due to situational consistencies • Learning view

  6. Mischel (1968) challenge • Primary criticisms • Little evidence of cross-situation consistency in behavior • Traits dependent on situational evocation • Traits poor predictors of behavior across situations (r < = .30) • Trait merely labels w/ no independent reality

  7. Controversy • Leads to near collapse of personality psychology • If traits aren’t real/stable/predictive what use are they? • No need for personality if behavior primarily due to situational features • Predict/understand behavioral variation via situation

  8. Field’s Response • Funder & Ozer (1983) • Reanalyzed studies showing situational influence on behavior • Situation had ~same predictive power as personality (r < = .30) • Power of situation = power of personality • Both rs < = .30

  9. Activity 13: Mischel • In groups of 3-4 • Describe the response to Mischel’s challenge made by Epstein. How does Mischel (re) challenge Epstein here? • Next describe at least 1 more response made by the field in defense of traits. • PLEASE TURN THESE IN AFTER CLASS!

  10. Kenrick & Funder: Fallout • PS debate led to numerous hypotheses regarding the relative importance of personality/situation • Many assumed that personality was an artifact, unreal and a weak predictor (empirically and conceptually) of behavior

  11. Kenrick & Funder: Hypotheses • H1: Personality is in eye of beholder • Interrater agreement fails to support • H4: Shared (incorrect) stereotypes account for rater agreement • Ratings predict independent behavioral manifestations (aggression, delay of gratification, social behavior)

  12. Kenrick & Funder: Hypotheses • H7: Effect of personality on behavior too small to be meaningful (.30) • Situational features share effect size (.30) • Small can be important & meaningful • Effect increases with aggregation

  13. Mischel’s Fallout • 1980s/90s reality/stability of traits revealed • Genetics, longitudinal, cross-cultural studies • Interactionism (nature & nurture): • Effect of personality depends on situation • Effects of situation depends on personality • Behavior = traits + situation + traits x situation • Greater external validity (Cattell: multivariate world)

  14. Lessons from PS Debate • Kenrick & Funder • Gray > black or white (closer to reality) • Limitations on behavioral prediction from personality and situation • Boundary conditions on personality ratings • Personality & Social Psych MUST work together

  15. Knowns • Person & situation important • Consistency varies across people • Situations vary in their power • Consistency varies as a function of both

  16. Unknowns • What person & situation Vs best? • Goals • Situational taxonomy

  17. Future: Integration? • Social-cognitive approach of Mischel • Trait approach of Costa & McCrae • Function & structure?

More Related