1 / 32

Measuring Diffusion Properties in Tissue: The Diffusion Tensor & Derived Indices

Measuring Diffusion Properties in Tissue: The Diffusion Tensor & Derived Indices. Gwenaëlle Douaud FMRIB, University of Oxford. Historical description of the diffusion tensor. Formalised by Peter Basser and colleagues (1994a; 1994b).  In an isotropic, unconstrained environment:

lorettareynolds
Download Presentation

Measuring Diffusion Properties in Tissue: The Diffusion Tensor & Derived Indices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Measuring Diffusion Properties in Tissue: The Diffusion Tensor & Derived Indices Gwenaëlle Douaud FMRIB, University of Oxford ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  2. Historical description of the diffusion tensor • Formalised by Peter Basser and colleagues (1994a; 1994b)  In an isotropic, unconstrained environment: D = scalar  In an anisotropic, constrained environment: D = 33 definite symmetric positive D = “diffusion tensor” ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  3. Historical description of the diffusion tensor 1  In an anisotropic, constrained environment: D = 33 definite symmetric positive D = “diffusion tensor” 2 3 with i  {1,2,3} ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  4. Diffusion tensor indices: Mean Diffusivity • Formalised by Peter Basser and Carlo Pierpaoli (1995; 1996)  Magnitude of diffusion Bammer, 2003 • First clinical application: brain ischemia (Moseley et al., 1990; Warach et al., 1992)  Visible only 3 hours after onset of stroke Warach et al., 1995 ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  5. Diffusion tensor indices: diffusion anisotropy • Formalised by Peter Basser and Carlo Pierpaoli (1995; 1996)  Anisotropy of diffusion Bammer, 2003 RA = “Relative Anisotropy” ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  6. Diffusion tensor indices: diffusion anisotropy • Formal comparison of three anisotropy indices (Papadakis et al., 1999)  FA: mapped diffusion anisotropy with the greatest detail and SNR  VR: provided the strongest CNR, but with  noise contamination, resolution  RA: intermediate between FA and VR ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  7. Diffusion tensor indices: diffusion anisotropy • Further comparison between FA and RA (Hasan et al., 2004) ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  8. Fractional Anisotropy and Mean Diffusivity: ROI and voxel-based/TBSS analysis • Developmental study: anatomical and tractography-defined ROI (Lebel et al., 2008) ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  9. Fractional Anisotropy and Mean Diffusivity: ROI and voxel-based/TBSS analysis • Developmental study: comparison between ROI and VBD (Snook et al., 2007)  The discrepancies related to: - ROI approach inherently limited - issues with the spatial normalisation for VBD analysis - masking localised changes by averaging all the voxels within a ROI ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  10. Fractional Anisotropy and Mean Diffusivity: ROI and voxel-based/TBSS analysis • Increasing sensitivity and interpretability of results compared with voxel-based approaches based purely on non-linear registration: TBSS (Smith et al., 2006) Mean Control Mean Patient TBSS VBD ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  11. Fractional Anisotropy and Mean Diffusivity: ROI and voxel-based/TBSS analysis • Large developmental and ageing study using TBSS (Westlye et al., 2010) ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  12. Fractional Anisotropy and Mean Diffusivity: first applications • Development(review in Beaulieu et al., 1999) • Ageing(review in Moseley, 2002) • Cognitive performance (review in Moseley et al., 2002) • White matter diseases (review in Horsfield and Jones, 2002): multiple sclerosis (Horsfield et al., 1998), Alzheimer’s disease (Hanyu et al., 1998), ALS, CJD etc. • Psychiatric diseases (review in Lim and Helpern, 2002): schizophrenia (Buchsbaum et al., 1998), alcoholism (Pfefferbaum et al., 2000) , depression etc. ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  13. Fractional Anisotropy and Mean Diffusivity: Two complementary measures • An intriguing finding in multiple sclerosis (Ciccarelli et al., 2001) Patient White matter Control basal ganglia  Increased FA in the basal ganglia in MS: selective Wallerian degeneration, with the intact connections showing an increase of their coherence? ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  14. Fractional Anisotropy and Mean Diffusivity: Two complementary measures • Same findings seen in the basal ganglia in Huntington’s disease (Douaud et al., 2009) ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  15. Using the information from the PDD (Schwartzmann et al., 2005) 1 2 3 Douaud et al., 2009 ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  16. Decrease of the dispersion of the PDD in Huntington’s disease (Douaud et al., 2009) ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  17. Beyond Fractional Anisotropy and Mean Diffusivity: the Mode of anisotropy • No difference in the white matter of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients using MD or FA (Douaud et al., 2011)  Mode of anisotropy (MO): 3rd moment of the tensor, introduced by Basser (1997), formalised by Ennis and Kindlamnn (2006). -1 Planar, disc-like 1~ 2: e.g., areas of crossing fibres +1 Linear, cigar-like 2~ 3: e.g., areas of one predominating fibre population ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  18. Beyond Fractional Anisotropy and Mean Diffusivity: the Mode of anisotropy • Significant difference in the white matter of MCI patients, with an increase of MO MCI>CON AD>CON AD>CON Douaud et al., 2011 ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  19. Beyond Fractional Anisotropy and Mean Diffusivity: the Mode of anisotropy • Significant increase of MO in MCI and AD also related to selective degeneration in crossing fibres region (here, centrum semiovale)? Douaud et al., 2011 ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  20. Beyond Fractional Anisotropy and Mean Diffusivity: Parallel and Perpendicular Diffusivity • Validated in animal models by Song and colleagues (2002; 2005)  Parallel diffusivity or axial diffusivity: assessing axonal injury = 1  Perpendicular diffusivity or radial diffusivity: assessing myelin injury ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  21. Beyond Fractional Anisotropy and Mean Diffusivity: Parallel and Perpendicular Diffusivity • Validated in humans using the model of callosotomy (Concha et al., 2006)  Axonal degradation  Myelin degradation ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  22. Diffusion tensor indices: in vivo models and histological validation • Basis of diffusion anisotropy in the brain: comprehensive review by Beaulieu (2002) • Anisotropy due to membrane, not myelin • Myelin modulates anisotropy • Axonal cytoskeleton does not contribute to anisotropy ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  23. Diffusion tensor indices: in vivo models and histological validation • Combined in vivo diffusion/histological study: animal model (van Camp et al., 2012) ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  24. Diffusion tensor indices: in vivo models and histological validation • Combined in vivo diffusion/histological study: epilepsy (Concha et al., 2010) ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  25. The depressing slide… • Sensitivity to noise increases with higher order moments: • noise(MD) < noise(FA) < noise (MO) • Crossing-fibres: effects can be averaged out Groeschel et al., ISMRM 2011 ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  26. The depressing slide… • Sensitivity to noise increases with higher order moments: • noise(MD) < noise(FA) < noise (MO) • Crossing-fibres: effects can be averaged out • Crossing-fibres: problematic interpretation of  and  ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  27. The depressing slide… • Sensitivity to noise increases with higher order moments: • noise(MD) < noise(FA) < noise (MO) • Crossing-fibres: effects can be averaged out • Crossing-fibres: problematic interpretation of  and  • Crossing-fibres: not only influence on FA, but also MD (Vos et al., 2012) Vos et al., ISMRM 2011 ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  28. The depressing slide… • Sensitivity to noise increases with higher order moments: • noise(MD) < noise(FA) < noise (MO) • Crossing-fibres: effects can be averaged out • Crossing-fibres: problematic interpretation of  and  • Crossing-fibres: not only influence on FA, but also MD • Effect of partial volume effect on FA, MD etc. (Jones, ISMRM 2011) • Correction for CSF contamination? (Metzler-Baddeley et al., 2012) • Choice of sequence: anisotropic voxels (Vos et al., ISMRM 2011) • Choice of sequence: 12 orientations, 5 b-values: more sensitive to using MD • 30 orientations, 2 b-values: more sensitive to  using FA ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  29. …Take home message • Choice of sequence: isotropic voxels, optimised for specific question • FA and MD complementary to interpret results: higher FA is not necessarily better •  and  give additional information (e.g., Salat et al., 2010) • Do not forget about PVE, noise andcrossing fibres to help interpret results If ambiguous interpretation: MO, dispersion of PDD, Westin indices (Westin et al., 1997) Vos et al., ISMRM 2011 ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  30. …Take home message • Choice of sequence: isotropic voxels, optimised for specific question • FA and MD complementary to interpret results: higher FA is not necessarily better •  and  give additional information (e.g., Salat et al., 2010) • Do not forget about PVE, noise andcrossing fibres to help interpret results If ambiguous interpretation: MO, dispersion of PDD, Westin indices (Westin et al., 1997) • Crossing fibres helps detect subtle differences (Tuch et al., 2005; Douaud et al., 2011) Tuch et al., 2005 ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  31. Special thanks to: • SHFJ, CEA, Orsay • Cyril Poupon • - Yann Cointepas • - Denis Riviere • - Jean-Francois Mangin • FMRIB, University of Oxford • - Karla Miller • - Stamatios Sotiropoulos • - Timothy Behrens • Steve Smith • Peter Jezzard • Saad Jbabdi THANK YOU ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

  32. Other diffusion tensor-derived measures • “Westin” indices describing the tensor shape: sphericity, linearity and planarity (Westin et al., 1997) • Inter-voxel measures: lattice index (Pierpaoli) • Fourth moment: kurtosis (Assaf) ISMRM Weekend course – 5th of May 2012

More Related