180 likes | 309 Views
The stagnation regime of the new keynesian model and current US policy George Evans. Discussion Frank Smets. Asset prices, credit and macroeconomic policies Marseilles 25-26 March 2011. The opinions expressed are our own and not necessarily those of the ECB, the Eurosystem or the NBB.
E N D
The stagnation regime of the new keynesian model and current US policy George Evans Discussion Frank Smets Asset prices, credit and macroeconomic policies Marseilles 25-26 March 2011 The opinions expressed are our own and not necessarily those of the ECB, the Eurosystem or the NBB.
Introduction • Builds on previous work with Honkapohja and Guse, which investigates which policies can avoid an unstable deflationary spiral, which arises in a standard New Keynesian model with active monetary policy and passive fiscal policy, a zero lower bound on interest rates and adaptive learning by the private agents. • Proposed policy: • A combination of aggressive lowering of interest rates to zero when a minimum inflation rate is reached and expansionary government spending.
Introduction Evans, Guse and Honkapohja (2008)
Introduction Evans, Guse and Honkapohja (2008)
Introduction • What’s new? • The inclusion of downward nominal wage/price rigidity. This explains why the economy may get stuck at a low inflation equilibrium, rather than trapped in a deflationary spiral (e.g. Japan) • A discussion of current US policies to avoid the deflationary trap • Proposal: • Aid to local municipalities and states to avoid countercyclical fiscal policy in return for setting up rainy-day funds. • Large-scale public infrastructure works financed by low interest rate bonds and central bank QE.
Introduction Evans (2010)
Comments on proposals • The world has moved on in the meantime: • QE2: assessment of effectiveness of QE2 has been quite positive (e.g. Krishnamurthy and Vissing-Jorgensen (2011)) • Unemployment is falling; inflation started rising; government debt is accumulating. • But many elements of the proposal make a lot of sense: • Importance of automatic stabilisers (US vs EU); • Rainy-day funds and the SGP; • Focus on productive government investment (but lags are long and efficiency may be affected).
Comments/questions • How large has been the risk of a deflationary spiral? • What is the evidence of downward nominal wage rigidity? • Can the policy recommendation be described as a switch from a combination of active monetary and passive fiscal policy to the reverse? • Fiscal space and government default risk? • What about a price-level targeting policy?
Inflation expectations: US vs euro area 5-year spot 5-year forwards 5 years ahead
Survey evidence of downward nominal wage rigidity in the euro area Note: The surveys were conducted in the context of the ESCB Wage Dynamics Network (WDN). See http://www.ecb.europa.eu/home/html/researcher_wdn.en.html for the main findiings of the WDN and details of the surveys conducted. The original survey was conducted mostly druing 2007. The follow-up survey was conducted mostly in the beginning of 2009. 12
Fiscal theory of the price level • Can the policy recommendation be described as a switch from a combination of active monetary and passive fiscal policy to the reverse? • How large would the necessary fiscal expansion be in that case? There is a need for realistic quantitative versions of these models.
Sovereign CDS spreads (5-year in bp) 7 Source: Datastream
Euro area countries: rapid budget deterioration Source: European Commission Forecast (Spring 2010).
Euro area countries: rapid rise in gross government debt Source: European Commission Forecast (Spring 2010).
Price level targeting • Is in my view too easily dismissed in the paper. • How does it change the stability analysis of the New Keynesian model? • If a credible price level targeting regime is established beforehand, then the learning rules will adapt, which in turn will stabilise the economy; much larger expectational shocks will then be needed to get trapped in the deflationary equilibrium. • Probably need long-horizon learning to analyse this properly. • Needs to be symmetric.