1 / 16

Indicators to compare r obustness and suitability of modeling software for application in the CADSES region

Indicators to compare r obustness and suitability of modeling software for application in the CADSES region. Irina Ribarova on behlaf of Floodmed team. The selected models. Indicators. Original purpose/status and history of the model application (maturity)

lou
Download Presentation

Indicators to compare r obustness and suitability of modeling software for application in the CADSES region

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Indicators to compare robustness and suitability of modeling software for application in the CADSES region Irina Ribarova on behlaf of Floodmed team

  2. The selected models

  3. Indicators • Original purpose/status and history of the model application (maturity) • Dependencies on previous models (scientific evolution) • Water balance • Spatial resolution and discretisation (horizontal and vertical) • Temporal resolution and discretisation • Input data requirement • Operational experience and skills requirement of users • Participation in previous model comparison studies • Existing sensitivity analysis • Cost indication (based on work load to set up and apply the model) • Applicability • Ability to be used with other models • Availability in the market

  4. HEC-HMS

  5. VfloTM

  6. SWAT

  7. NAM

  8. MISD

  9. IMGW Modeling platform

  10. TRIM2D

  11. Hron

  12. HSPF

  13. VIDRA

  14. Comparative table

  15. Conclusions • In terms of “water balance”, “temporal resolution”, “input data” and “applicability” all models are evaluated positively; • Only HEC-HMS has been evaluated negatively in terms of “spatial resolution”. This model also in the only one, which does not provide sensitivity analyses, but wins in terms of its ability to be used with other models; • Definitely IMGW requires highly qualified personnel; highest cost indication and can not be reach easily in the market; • Three models are free of charge to be downloaded – HEC-HMS, SWAT and HSPF; • The “winners” in the comparison, with less negative evaluations are SWAT and HSPF.

  16. Further work

More Related