1 / 21

The Influence of Display Characteristics on Visual Exploratory Search Behavior

The Influence of Display Characteristics on Visual Exploratory Search Behavior. Jeff Schoenle September 2, 2008. Topics Presented. Goal-directed versus Exploratory Searches Layout Influences Studies on Displays. Goal-Directed Search. Definition

lovey
Download Presentation

The Influence of Display Characteristics on Visual Exploratory Search Behavior

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Influence of Display Characteristics on Visual Exploratory Search Behavior Jeff Schoenle September 2, 2008

  2. Topics Presented • Goal-directed versus Exploratory Searches • Layout Influences • Studies on Displays

  3. Goal-Directed Search • Definition • The planned acquisition of data using a search routine stored in memory or generated for the current task • Examples: • Looking top to bottom or left to right • Searching for certain colors or shapes

  4. Goal-Directed Search (cont.) • Search is governed by… • Demands of the search task • Organization of information in the surrounding environment • Prior experiences of the person conducting the search • Factors that influence the visual environment • Salience • Layout

  5. Salience • What is salience? • Makes items easier to see than others • Size • Color • Contrast with other items

  6. Layout • What is layout? • Organization strategy for a visual space • Uses a particular sorting element or category • What are its uses? • Limits attention to a certain item(s) • Helps speed up search process

  7. Exploratory Search • Description • Works as a process to select certain items that may be then involved in a goal-directed search • Used as an information gathering technique • More general than a goal-directed search • Always an on-going activity • Is able to direct attention to a certain item or items

  8. Exploratory Search (cont.) • How does it work? • Determines how much attention will be paid to a location • Responsible for any changes in attention level or attention location • Weighs whether or not more information will be obtained by focusing on one location or another

  9. Nonfocal Material • What does nonfocal mean? • Outside of the main focus area • Could be understood as things in your peripheral vision • Important implications • Companies try to design packaging in order so that their product will attract the customer’s eyes • There is competition for attention, so the product packaging must be able to hold attention when surrounded by other products

  10. Study 1 • Purpose • Look at attention levels given to items when surrounded by differing items • Dual Hypotheses • People engaged in a goal-directed search routine will spend less time looking at areas that are surrounded by a configuration of material that allows for an easy shift in attention • People engaged in an exploratory search routine should spend less time looking at target areas that are surrounded by material generating a strong demand for attention

  11. Study 1 (cont.) • Method • Objects were divided into 48 displays of 4 objects each • Forty undergraduate students looked at the displays while their eye movement was monitored • Eye movement was measured in degrees

  12. Study 1 (cont.) • Results • Goal-directed search hypothesis was not supported by the data • Areas using an easier search were viewed for longer periods of time, not shorter periods • Exploratory search hypothesis was supported by the data • An increase in competition for attention by nonfocal objects led to less attention being paid on the focal object

  13. Study 2 • Purpose • Test the ability of the subjects to remember the objects • Hypotheses • Tested the same hypotheses as in study 1 • Goal-directed search • Exploratory search

  14. Study 2 (cont.) • Method • Used cued-recall technique to measure level of recall • Selected 64 objects to be used • Objects determined by 20 subjects • Objects grouped into 16 displays of 4 objects each • Groups had other displays around them to provide competition for attention • A questionnaire was given to 117 subjects asking about their impressions of a sticker book that was created and included the 64 objects

  15. Study 2 (cont.) • Method (cont.) • Students were then asked to remember as many of the objects as possible • Results • Best memory level was for objects presented in a low-competition area • Memory levels were better in moderate competition areas than in high competition areas • Increasing the competition level means a decrease in the memory level • Results support an exploratory search routine process • Results could be biased because of method that may have supported an exploratory search routine

  16. Study 3 • Used same procedure as Study 2 • Two booklets were created • Booklet 1 had displays of objects in a noncompetitive environment • Booklet 2 had displays of objects in a visually competitive environment • Hypothesis • Memory of information from Booklet 1 would be better than memory of information from Booklet 2

  17. Study 3 (cont.) • Results • Reduced competition for attention resulted in a better memory level for the objects and displays • Exploratory search routines are likely to only have a minimal impact regarding purchasing decisions

  18. Study 4 • Purpose • Show that an exploratory search routine could have an impact on attention and sales moreso than a goal-directed routine • Hypotheses • Product size will be the variable that will most likely influence sales and attention for a goal-directed search routine • Competition for attention will be the variable that will most likely influence sales and attention for an exploratory search routine

  19. Study 4 (cont.) • Method • Environment should support both types of search routines • Catalog shopping was chosen • Objects were 11 two-page women’s clothing displays • 54 women were chosen as subjects • Allowed to flip through a binder that contained the displays • Average time looking at each display was recorded

  20. Study 4 (cont.) • Results • Attention on the focal product decreased as competition for attention by the nonfocal products increased • Sales for the focal product decreased as competition for attention by the nonfocal products increased • Competition for attention explained differences in sales and attention

  21. Discussion Questions • As stated in the last section of the article, more effort on research has been given to goal-directed searches than to exploratory searches. Why do you think this is? • What type of search routine do you believe you fit under? • What are some tactics companies can used in order to focus attention on their products? • If you were a marketing executive, how would you try to promote your company’s product?

More Related