150 likes | 320 Views
GRADUATE CAPSTONE COURSES and CULMINATING EXPERIENCES: COMPONENTS, USES , AND ASSESSMENT. Barbara Peat Indiana University Northwest Anand Desai Ohio State University. NASPAA Competency Committee. Survey Role & Purpose of Culminating Experience Spring 2012 282 Schools surveyed
E N D
GRADUATE CAPSTONE COURSES and CULMINATING EXPERIENCES: COMPONENTS, USES, AND ASSESSMENT Barbara Peat Indiana University Northwest Anand Desai Ohio State University
NASPAA Competency Committee Survey • Role & Purpose of Culminating Experience Spring 2012 282 Schools surveyed 151 (53.5%) responses
Respondent Accreditation Status 68% currently accredited 11% seeking accreditation 21% not accredited
Degree (120 responses) 85% offer Master of Public Administration 9% offer Master of Public Affairs 11% offer Master of Public Policy 2% offer Master of Public Management 11% offer other degrees Some schools offer multiple degrees
TYPE OF CAPSTONE COURSE /CULMINATING EXPERIENCE CAPSTONE COURSE 53% CAPSTONE PROJECT 40% THESIS 20% RESEARCH PAPER 17% COMPREHENSIVE EXAM 16% PORTFOLIO 10% PRACTICUM ORAL PRESENTATION 10% SERVICE LEARNING PROJECT 8% PRACTICUM PAPER 7%
Description of Culminating Experience 111 provided a brief description Most had team or group project Multiple requirements, usually a paper and a presentation • Case study • Community project Some focused on career planning
Used for Assessing Universal Competencies? 93% “Yes” 113 responses Lead and manage in public governance 63% Participate in and contribute to the public policy process 70% Analyze, synthesize, think critically, solve problems and make decisions99% Articulate and apply a public service perspective 69% Communicate and interact productively with a diverse and changing work force & citizenry 63%
What are the skill sets assessed? Oral presentation 74% Computer aided presentations (power point, charts, graphs, etc.) 62% Research (quantitative and/or qualitative) 88% Teamwork 37% Writing 98%
THEMES OF WRITE-IN RESPONSESOTHER SKILLS SETS ANALYTICAL PROBLEM SOLUTION CLIENT MANAGEMENT KNOWLEDGE OF FIELD PROGRAM EVALUATION CRITICAL THINKING REFLECTION/SELF-AWARENESS
Who assesses performance? Capstone course instructor solely 63% Group of faculty within the program 58% Other faculty at the university 8% Community representatives 15% Peers 15% Alumni 7% Advisory board members 8% Employers 5% Internship Supervisors 6%
LIKERT RATINGS OF BENEFITSOF MODEL USED • TOP RATED – REQUIRES INTEGRATION OF LEARNING FROM OTHER COURSES IN THE MASTER’S PROGRAM (71% INDICATING VERY BENEFICIAL) INCREASES STUDENT KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, AND ABILITIES IN RESEARCH (64% INDICATED VERY BENEFICIAL)
THEMES OF BENEFITS OF THE MODEL USED PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT REFLECTION CAREER BUILDING APPLICATION OF COURSE WORK COMMUNITY SERVICE
LIKERT RATINGS OF CHALLENGES OF MODEL USED TOP RATED – DETERMINING APPROPRIATE MEASURES OF STUDENT PERFORMANCE (49% SOMEWHAT CHALLENGING) LOCATING APPROPRIATE SERVICE LEARNING PROJECTS (36% SOMEWHAT CHALLENGING)
THEMES OF CHALLENGES OF MODEL USED LACK OF CLARITY OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION APPLICATION OF COURSE LEARNING TO REAL LIFE GROUP WORK – CAN BE DIFFICULT LOCATING APPROPRIATE CLIENTS